Advertisement
Setting minimum vouch for commenting in a system´s thread vote results
Setting minimum vouch for commenting in a system´s thread Discussion
Oct 14, 2010 at 14:18
1,357 Views
10 Replies
Oct 14, 2010 at 14:18
The noise and the chitchatting is noticeably increased in those systems threads showing some trading success. I want the community to vote for including the option to control who can post a comment by setting a minimum vouch level.
Aimak
Aimak
exquisite entries with calculated exits
forex_trader_8139
Member Since Mar 04, 2010
411 posts
Oct 14, 2010 at 15:36
probably a good idea.
Oct 14, 2010 at 17:11
(edited Oct 14, 2010 at 17:13)
Hi Aimak,
Minimum vouch level is not going to serve the purpose you have in mind. There are some who have sufficient vouches but yet go around trashing everyone's thread for no rhyme or reason. It's probably their way of dealing with their own inferiority complex. 😀 And like you have mentioned, they do this to those who trade profitably.
It would be a better idea if the system owner has the option of banning the noise makers from their thread... just like the admin of a blog is able to do.
But I agree with your basic suggestion, that there has to be some mechanism that allows us to moderate our own thread. Or else Myfxbook staff should deal with these people who exhibit very anti-social and unruly behaviour on other people's threads.
I think we all have a pretty good idea of who these people are. 😉
Minimum vouch level is not going to serve the purpose you have in mind. There are some who have sufficient vouches but yet go around trashing everyone's thread for no rhyme or reason. It's probably their way of dealing with their own inferiority complex. 😀 And like you have mentioned, they do this to those who trade profitably.
It would be a better idea if the system owner has the option of banning the noise makers from their thread... just like the admin of a blog is able to do.
But I agree with your basic suggestion, that there has to be some mechanism that allows us to moderate our own thread. Or else Myfxbook staff should deal with these people who exhibit very anti-social and unruly behaviour on other people's threads.
I think we all have a pretty good idea of who these people are. 😉
Oct 14, 2010 at 19:03
ranesh posted:
Hi Aimak,
Minimum vouch level is not going to serve the purpose you have in mind. There are some who have sufficient vouches but yet go around trashing everyone's thread for no rhyme or reason. It's probably their way of dealing with their own inferiority complex. 😀 And like you have mentioned, they do this to those who trade profitably.
It would be a better idea if the system owner has the option of banning the noise makers from their thread... just like the admin of a blog is able to do.
But I agree with your basic suggestion, that there has to be some mechanism that allows us to moderate our own thread. Or else Myfxbook staff should deal with these people who exhibit very anti-social and unruly behaviour on other people's threads.
I think we all have a pretty good idea of who these people are. 😉
Agree with you 100%.
aaa
Member Since Oct 29, 2009
18 posts
Oct 16, 2010 at 04:24
Hi everybpdy,
I also agree with you all 100%. I just voted YES above.
Those guys who can not make any money, if not to say, lose money to forex market always try to find faults with other profitable traders, and try to criticize everything. This is not a good way. Hope these things should be minimized as much as possible.
Have a nice day !
James
I also agree with you all 100%. I just voted YES above.
Those guys who can not make any money, if not to say, lose money to forex market always try to find faults with other profitable traders, and try to criticize everything. This is not a good way. Hope these things should be minimized as much as possible.
Have a nice day !
James
Member Since May 02, 2010
10 posts
Oct 16, 2010 at 14:35
I think it's kind of a good idea, but if you set up the minimum to 1, 2 or 3 vouches to be able to post a comment, then maybe 60-90% of forum members cannot post anything since they have no vouches at all.
And some people still have 3 vouches, but are noise makers, so this wouldn't work well.
Also banning chosen people from posting on your thread might lead to a situation that somebody allows only positive opinions and all negative are banned no matter if they are right or not.
There should be a system that sieves off those noise makers and everything&everybody haters. I gave a new suggestion in the suggestion box. Waiting for others.
And some people still have 3 vouches, but are noise makers, so this wouldn't work well.
Also banning chosen people from posting on your thread might lead to a situation that somebody allows only positive opinions and all negative are banned no matter if they are right or not.
There should be a system that sieves off those noise makers and everything&everybody haters. I gave a new suggestion in the suggestion box. Waiting for others.
forex_trader_7
Member Since Aug 01, 2009
895 posts
Oct 17, 2010 at 03:20
(edited Oct 17, 2010 at 03:23)
I think it's a bad idea. Slippery slope guys. Now the con can control his own thread. To a degree anyway. If you're going to post a system you have to be prepared to be challenged.
It's through the process of challenge that you can have the dialogue that proves you know what you're doing.
It's through the process of challenge that you can have the dialogue that proves you know what you're doing.
Member Since May 19, 2010
30 posts
Nov 06, 2010 at 11:34
aj90151 posted:
ranesh posted:
Hi Aimak,
Minimum vouch level is not going to serve the purpose you have in mind. There are some who have sufficient vouches but yet go around trashing everyone's thread for no rhyme or reason. It's probably their way of dealing with their own inferiority complex. 😀 And like you have mentioned, they do this to those who trade profitably.
It would be a better idea if the system owner has the option of banning the noise makers from their thread... just like the admin of a blog is able to do.
But I agree with your basic suggestion, that there has to be some mechanism that allows us to moderate our own thread. Or else Myfxbook staff should deal with these people who exhibit very anti-social and unruly behaviour on other people's threads.
I think we all have a pretty good idea of who these people are. 😉
Agree with you 100%.
agree with you 100% too
by the way, we can "block user" in someone profile (suspect). so, we can filter own discussion.
little deposit to huge withdrawal
Member Since Jun 16, 2010
198 posts
Nov 06, 2010 at 14:49
Have to vote no, the ability to block comments is the conmans best tool to avoid negative comments.
On the other hand, a possibility to vote for a specific user banning could be a possible solution - lets say 5 to 10 unique users with a more than 3 months old membership has to vote for banning a user from commenting... Feedback please, and a new suggestion could be started...
Cheers
Soeren
On the other hand, a possibility to vote for a specific user banning could be a possible solution - lets say 5 to 10 unique users with a more than 3 months old membership has to vote for banning a user from commenting... Feedback please, and a new suggestion could be started...
Cheers
Soeren
Always get cashback -
Nov 08, 2010 at 12:33
Agree with Soeren regaring conmen, however it will end up as a mob rule if people start voting for bans.
best soloution is either for the posts to be reported and admin to deal with acordingly dependent on the members history.
There should also be an ignore button so that members can choose to ignore trolls therby making their posts invisible.
best soloution is either for the posts to be reported and admin to deal with acordingly dependent on the members history.
There should also be an ignore button so that members can choose to ignore trolls therby making their posts invisible.
vgauci3@
*Commercial use and spam will not be tolerated, and may result in account termination.
Tip: Posting an image/youtube url will automatically embed it in your post!
Tip: Type the @ sign to auto complete a username participating in this discussion.
