チャットを利用するには、ログインしてください。
連絡先に戻る

HedgeTrackTrader (による HT Trader )

増加 : +484.98%
ドローダウン 36.10%
ピップス: 9372.2
取引 1084
勝利:
負け:
タイプ: リアル
レバレッジ: 1:500
取引: 自動

HedgeTrackTrader 討論

Swing Trading FX (Daveski)
May 10 2016 at 06:51
37 投稿
rob559 posted:
sirius1fx

excellent debunking...you are the man


Good Job! @sirius1fx

Plan the Trade. Trade the Plan
weesoh88
May 10 2016 at 07:02
6 投稿
Using the default risk setting of 35%, the EA would have encountered SL six times over the past 1 year, if you examine the chart carefully.

I don't understand why you try to brush it off as 'false claims' that are 'absolutely untrue'.

HT Trader (HTTrader)
May 10 2016 at 13:25
23 投稿
As manual recommends 100% risk should be used. And it's defined by how much capital is uses.

weesoh88
May 10 2016 at 14:38
6 投稿
Nonsense. Nowhere in the manual recommended using 100% risk. The manual says default settings should be used, and the default risk shows 0.35 whenever the 'reset' button is clicked.

HT Trader (HTTrader)
May 10 2016 at 14:47
23 投稿
weesoh88
May 11 2016 at 06:15
6 投稿
The last part says:

'The minimum deposit for lot=0.01 is $1200. but be aware - you will trade with 100% risk! So for safe trade it’s better to have about $3400 on your deposit.'

The above only tells us that for a 0.01 lot starting size, you are risking $1200. But if you have $3400, and you set the risk to 0.35, the minimum lot size is still 0.01. You are effectively risking 3400 x 0.35 = $1190, which is approximately $1200 as above.

Does anyone else interpret the above as recommending the users to set the risk to 100%???

FXtrader2010
May 17 2016 at 11:01
724 投稿
This is the exact same as forexseven

mmghazal
Jun 03 2016 at 08:14
3 投稿
Why this account is not updated since 12 April !? since more then 1.5 months ?

Rooi
Jun 09 2016 at 09:11
38 投稿
Most probably blown - BooooooM !!!!!

コメント の為にログインしてください