Edit Your Comment
Discussion of the Forex Contest OctaFX Forex Contest
Jun 19, 2014 at 06:57
Mar 30, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물10
mcrious posted:FXpipbull posted:
most of these contest usually end up just like this one. Most of these EA's these traders use either are not allowed or dont work on a real account. And if the leader has this EA on a real account that can be verified it would be linked to some social site somewhere. anyways want to see a real trader that doesnt use a robot. MQL5 user name johnpaul77.
When these robots work so well why are they still doing contests with it and making all this trouble?
Agreed just got wind of him this week, so boss.
Life is tough, it's tougher if you're stupid.
Jun 19, 2014 at 09:54
Apr 02, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물8
MrSky posted:Aggresive posted:MrSky posted:
I'm dying to get my hands on a robot like this!
How it works in a real account @meer55 ?
On a real account will not work. The broker will not allow.
Thanks for the info @Aggresive
But what about his aggressive system that profited +1673% on a real account very quickly, which robot you are using for this spectacular result?
Has been used Adviser AGGRESIVE_SILENCE v1.35
In the description of the account, there is a link
Jun 24, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물40
Mar 13, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물6
Jun 19, 2014 at 15:13
Jan 30, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물2
I can't believe one of them was trying to justify why no one should be upset over the fact that he was cheating, because it was a system designed by man. So, I guess as long as something that's designed to cheat it's okay ethically because it was designed by man. Seriously?
Okay, so if we're playing poker and I design a way to shuffle cards to give myself the best hand when needed it would be okay because it was designed by man. Makes sense according to his logic, right?
Some people are just completely foolish in their thought process. Glad they're gone, can't deal w/ cheaters.
Okay, so if we're playing poker and I design a way to shuffle cards to give myself the best hand when needed it would be okay because it was designed by man. Makes sense according to his logic, right?
Some people are just completely foolish in their thought process. Glad they're gone, can't deal w/ cheaters.
Jun 19, 2014 at 20:47
Mar 30, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물10
Because it is. He wasn't doing the trading himself. This is a contest of HUMANS trading against HUMANS, not robots. If that were the case we'd all just set up one and be done with it and let the contest play out, where is the fun in that? It's stupid.
Life is tough, it's tougher if you're stupid.
May 15, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물2
Jun 20, 2014 at 11:49
Mar 18, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물2
It's in the contest rules that EA's are allowed so I don't know what the fuss is about. The rules never said it's a contest of humans against humans so I don't know where you got that too, that's just your opinion. And whats wrong with winners being in the same country ? Is that proof of cheating ? completely lost on that comment. Their trading history show no proof of that too.
The disqualified contestants with less than 1 sec trading time obviously used an EA which does Arbitrage trading, as much as it works on demo, it wont on real.
The disqualified contestants with less than 1 sec trading time obviously used an EA which does Arbitrage trading, as much as it works on demo, it wont on real.

*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.