Edit Your Comment
Discussion of the Forex Contest OctaFX Forex Contest
Jun 19, 2014 at 06:57
會員從Mar 30, 2014開始
10帖子
mcrious posted:FXpipbull posted:
most of these contest usually end up just like this one. Most of these EA's these traders use either are not allowed or dont work on a real account. And if the leader has this EA on a real account that can be verified it would be linked to some social site somewhere. anyways want to see a real trader that doesnt use a robot. MQL5 user name johnpaul77.
When these robots work so well why are they still doing contests with it and making all this trouble?
Agreed just got wind of him this week, so boss.
Life is tough, it's tougher if you're stupid.
Jun 19, 2014 at 09:54
會員從Apr 02, 2014開始
8帖子
MrSky posted:Aggresive posted:MrSky posted:
I'm dying to get my hands on a robot like this!
How it works in a real account @meer55 ?
On a real account will not work. The broker will not allow.
Thanks for the info @Aggresive
But what about his aggressive system that profited +1673% on a real account very quickly, which robot you are using for this spectacular result?
Has been used Adviser AGGRESIVE_SILENCE v1.35
In the description of the account, there is a link
會員從Jun 24, 2011開始
40帖子
會員從Mar 13, 2014開始
6帖子
Jun 19, 2014 at 15:13
會員從Jan 30, 2014開始
2帖子
I can't believe one of them was trying to justify why no one should be upset over the fact that he was cheating, because it was a system designed by man. So, I guess as long as something that's designed to cheat it's okay ethically because it was designed by man. Seriously?
Okay, so if we're playing poker and I design a way to shuffle cards to give myself the best hand when needed it would be okay because it was designed by man. Makes sense according to his logic, right?
Some people are just completely foolish in their thought process. Glad they're gone, can't deal w/ cheaters.
Okay, so if we're playing poker and I design a way to shuffle cards to give myself the best hand when needed it would be okay because it was designed by man. Makes sense according to his logic, right?
Some people are just completely foolish in their thought process. Glad they're gone, can't deal w/ cheaters.
Jun 19, 2014 at 20:47
會員從Mar 30, 2014開始
10帖子
Because it is. He wasn't doing the trading himself. This is a contest of HUMANS trading against HUMANS, not robots. If that were the case we'd all just set up one and be done with it and let the contest play out, where is the fun in that? It's stupid.
Life is tough, it's tougher if you're stupid.
會員從May 15, 2014開始
2帖子
Jun 20, 2014 at 11:49
會員從Mar 18, 2014開始
2帖子
It's in the contest rules that EA's are allowed so I don't know what the fuss is about. The rules never said it's a contest of humans against humans so I don't know where you got that too, that's just your opinion. And whats wrong with winners being in the same country ? Is that proof of cheating ? completely lost on that comment. Their trading history show no proof of that too.
The disqualified contestants with less than 1 sec trading time obviously used an EA which does Arbitrage trading, as much as it works on demo, it wont on real.
The disqualified contestants with less than 1 sec trading time obviously used an EA which does Arbitrage trading, as much as it works on demo, it wont on real.

*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。