Discussion of the Forex Contest OctaFX Forex Contest

Jun 02, 2014 at 06:27
13,925 Просмотры
348 Replies
Участник с Nov 26, 2013   6 комментариев
Jun 19, 2014 at 06:48
@mcrious ,40 pips and over $21000 profit in 'zero seconds?' what is zero seconds
Участник с Jun 05, 2014   11 комментариев
Jun 19, 2014 at 06:49
kentut_dawet posted:
Olala ..... My Account Loss 50.000 Hit BIG Spread .....................................
you meant you lost 50usd or 50000usd, that is a big distance between it. I think you should stop it.
Участник с Mar 30, 2014   10 комментариев
Jun 19, 2014 at 06:57
mcrious posted:
FXpipbull posted:
most of these contest usually end up just like this one. Most of these EA's these traders use either are not allowed or dont work on a real account. And if the leader has this EA on a real account that can be verified it would be linked to some social site somewhere. anyways want to see a real trader that doesnt use a robot. MQL5 user name johnpaul77.

When these robots work so well why are they still doing contests with it and making all this trouble?

Agreed just got wind of him this week, so boss.
Life is tough, it's tougher if you're stupid.
Участник с Apr 02, 2014   8 комментариев
Jun 19, 2014 at 09:54
MrSky posted:
Aggresive posted:
MrSky posted:
I'm dying to get my hands on a robot like this!
How it works in a real account @meer55 ?
On a real account will not work. The broker will not allow.

Thanks for the info @Aggresive
But what about his aggressive system that profited +1673% on a real account very quickly, which robot you are using for this spectacular result?
Has been used Adviser AGGRESIVE_SILENCE v1.35
In the description of the account, there is a link
Участник с Jun 24, 2011   42 комментариев
Jun 19, 2014 at 09:54
Now we have 2 cheaters in 1st and 2nd positions. wat is this, a cheater contest?
Участник с Jun 04, 2014   18 комментариев
Jun 19, 2014 at 09:57
chuchu posted:
@mcrious ,40 pips and over $21000 profit in 'zero seconds?' what is zero seconds
the time the position was held was zero seconds
Участник с Jul 31, 2009   1444 комментариев
Jun 19, 2014 at 10:55
Metcalfe99 posted:
Now we have 2 cheaters in 1st and 2nd positions. wat is this, a cheater contest?

Both were disqualified.
Участник с Apr 02, 2014   8 комментариев
Jun 19, 2014 at 12:53
Staff posted:
Metcalfe99 posted:
Now we have 2 cheaters in 1st and 2nd positions. wat is this, a cheater contest?

Both were disqualified.
As they could be?
Участник с Mar 13, 2014   6 комментариев
Jun 19, 2014 at 12:55
when trading is cheating, no meaning to join contest. i dont agree with the admin. they just traded and disqualified. its nonsense.
no logical reason here..
Участник с Jan 30, 2014   2 комментариев
Jun 19, 2014 at 15:13
I can't believe one of them was trying to justify why no one should be upset over the fact that he was cheating, because it was a system designed by man. So, I guess as long as something that's designed to cheat it's okay ethically because it was designed by man. Seriously?

Okay, so if we're playing poker and I design a way to shuffle cards to give myself the best hand when needed it would be okay because it was designed by man. Makes sense according to his logic, right?

Some people are just completely foolish in their thought process. Glad they're gone, can't deal w/ cheaters.
Участник с Apr 08, 2014   9 комментариев
Jun 19, 2014 at 15:18
Overall risk, my account of the championship dropped from $ 22K to $ 3K, but I still will arrive in you! 😎
"Quantos sabem o que é se tornar a versão perfeita de si mesmo?"
Участник с Jul 04, 2013   1 комментариев
Jun 19, 2014 at 15:19
А роботом можно торговать на конкурсе?
Только вперед
Участник с Nov 18, 2011   15 комментариев
Jun 19, 2014 at 20:40
I do not defend anyone. If any strategy allowed why not. why do you said is cheating?
ASOT
forex_trader_192470
Участник с May 28, 2014   5 комментариев
Jun 19, 2014 at 20:43
Andrey73 posted:
А роботом можно торговать на конкурсе?
Да, можно
Участник с Apr 20, 2012   23 комментариев
Jun 19, 2014 at 20:47
Contest full of cheaters ! how come most of the time top rankings are from the same country !
Участник с Mar 30, 2014   10 комментариев
Jun 19, 2014 at 20:47
Because it is. He wasn't doing the trading himself. This is a contest of HUMANS trading against HUMANS, not robots. If that were the case we'd all just set up one and be done with it and let the contest play out, where is the fun in that? It's stupid.
Life is tough, it's tougher if you're stupid.
CuttingEdgeForex
forex_trader_111028
Участник с Feb 07, 2013   8 комментариев
Jun 20, 2014 at 03:36
EAS are allowed. Broker latency arbitrage EAs however are NOT allowed.
Участник с May 15, 2014   2 комментариев
Jun 20, 2014 at 06:45
the forex heat map the best tool for trader i hope the my fx book make it like this people here, good suggestion for team developers check this video
Участник с Mar 30, 2014   10 комментариев
Jun 20, 2014 at 06:45
Hey guys, I'm a FX newbie, so don't laugh at my silly question. But can we only trade during the london market hours that are on the market watch timeframe in Metatrader 4 for this contest?
Life is tough, it's tougher if you're stupid.
Участник с Mar 18, 2014   2 комментариев
Jun 20, 2014 at 11:49
It's in the contest rules that EA's are allowed so I don't know what the fuss is about. The rules never said it's a contest of humans against humans so I don't know where you got that too, that's just your opinion. And whats wrong with winners being in the same country ? Is that proof of cheating ? completely lost on that comment. Their trading history show no proof of that too.

The disqualified contestants with less than 1 sec trading time obviously used an EA which does Arbitrage trading, as much as it works on demo, it wont on real.
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*Коммерческое использование и спам не допускаются и могут привести к аннулированию аккаунта.
Совет: Размещенные изображения или ссылки на Youtube автоматически вставляются в ваше сообщение!
Совет: введите знак @ для автоматического заполнения имени пользователя, участвующего в этом обсуждении.