Edit Your Comment
Discussion of the Forex Contest OctaFX Forex Contest
Jun 19, 2014 at 06:57
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 30, 2014
10 โพสต์
mcrious posted:FXpipbull posted:
most of these contest usually end up just like this one. Most of these EA's these traders use either are not allowed or dont work on a real account. And if the leader has this EA on a real account that can be verified it would be linked to some social site somewhere. anyways want to see a real trader that doesnt use a robot. MQL5 user name johnpaul77.
When these robots work so well why are they still doing contests with it and making all this trouble?
Agreed just got wind of him this week, so boss.
Life is tough, it's tougher if you're stupid.
Jun 19, 2014 at 09:54
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Apr 02, 2014
8 โพสต์
MrSky posted:Aggresive posted:MrSky posted:
I'm dying to get my hands on a robot like this!
How it works in a real account @meer55 ?
On a real account will not work. The broker will not allow.
Thanks for the info @Aggresive
But what about his aggressive system that profited +1673% on a real account very quickly, which robot you are using for this spectacular result?
Has been used Adviser AGGRESIVE_SILENCE v1.35
In the description of the account, there is a link
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jun 24, 2011
40 โพสต์
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 31, 2009
1418 โพสต์
Jun 19, 2014 at 10:55
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 31, 2009
1418 โพสต์
Metcalfe99 posted:
Now we have 2 cheaters in 1st and 2nd positions. wat is this, a cheater contest?
Both were disqualified.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 13, 2014
6 โพสต์
Jun 19, 2014 at 15:13
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 30, 2014
2 โพสต์
I can't believe one of them was trying to justify why no one should be upset over the fact that he was cheating, because it was a system designed by man. So, I guess as long as something that's designed to cheat it's okay ethically because it was designed by man. Seriously?
Okay, so if we're playing poker and I design a way to shuffle cards to give myself the best hand when needed it would be okay because it was designed by man. Makes sense according to his logic, right?
Some people are just completely foolish in their thought process. Glad they're gone, can't deal w/ cheaters.
Okay, so if we're playing poker and I design a way to shuffle cards to give myself the best hand when needed it would be okay because it was designed by man. Makes sense according to his logic, right?
Some people are just completely foolish in their thought process. Glad they're gone, can't deal w/ cheaters.
Jun 19, 2014 at 20:47
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 30, 2014
10 โพสต์
Because it is. He wasn't doing the trading himself. This is a contest of HUMANS trading against HUMANS, not robots. If that were the case we'd all just set up one and be done with it and let the contest play out, where is the fun in that? It's stupid.
Life is tough, it's tougher if you're stupid.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ May 15, 2014
2 โพสต์
Jun 20, 2014 at 06:45
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 30, 2014
10 โพสต์
Hey guys, I'm a FX newbie, so don't laugh at my silly question. But can we only trade during the london market hours that are on the market watch timeframe in Metatrader 4 for this contest?
Life is tough, it's tougher if you're stupid.
Jun 20, 2014 at 11:49
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 18, 2014
2 โพสต์
It's in the contest rules that EA's are allowed so I don't know what the fuss is about. The rules never said it's a contest of humans against humans so I don't know where you got that too, that's just your opinion. And whats wrong with winners being in the same country ? Is that proof of cheating ? completely lost on that comment. Their trading history show no proof of that too.
The disqualified contestants with less than 1 sec trading time obviously used an EA which does Arbitrage trading, as much as it works on demo, it wont on real.
The disqualified contestants with less than 1 sec trading time obviously used an EA which does Arbitrage trading, as much as it works on demo, it wont on real.

*การใช้งานเชิงพาณิชย์และสแปมจะไม่ได้รับการยอมรับ และอาจส่งผลให้บัญชีถูกยกเลิก
เคล็ดลับ: การโพสต์รูปภาพ/youtube url จะฝังลงในโพสต์ของคุณโดยอัตโนมัติ!
เคล็ดลับ: พิมพ์เครื่องหมาย @ เพื่อป้อนชื่อผู้ใช้ที่เข้าร่วมการสนทนานี้โดยอัตโนมัติ