Edit Your Comment
Hi i need a simple EA
Biedrs kopš
7 ieraksti
Jul 30, 2013 at 20:02
Biedrs kopš
7 ieraksti
Hi i need a simple EA.It is very simple:
1) Put a variable to switch timeframes: between 5 min or 15 min or 30 min
2) 2 EMA indicator, the fast one plotted on 4 periods while the slow is on 8 periods.
3) If the fast EMA is above the slow EMA =market order BUY, If the fast EMA is below the slow EMA =market order SELL
4) Profit target (again needs a variable to be set by the user)
5) Stop loss (again needs a variable to be set by the user)
6) LOT (again needs a variable to be set by the user)
Thats all.And thanks in advance if someone would make it for me!
1) Put a variable to switch timeframes: between 5 min or 15 min or 30 min
2) 2 EMA indicator, the fast one plotted on 4 periods while the slow is on 8 periods.
3) If the fast EMA is above the slow EMA =market order BUY, If the fast EMA is below the slow EMA =market order SELL
4) Profit target (again needs a variable to be set by the user)
5) Stop loss (again needs a variable to be set by the user)
6) LOT (again needs a variable to be set by the user)
Thats all.And thanks in advance if someone would make it for me!
It's all about bucks, kid. The rest is conversation...
Biedrs kopš
41 ieraksti
Aug 02, 2013 at 11:51
Biedrs kopš
41 ieraksti
Perhaps X Trader is what you are looking for: http://codebase.mql4.com/8407. However, this EA cannot be profitable without prior optimizing.
Biedrs kopš
189 ieraksti
Aug 07, 2013 at 13:54
Biedrs kopš
189 ieraksti
if you desire you can wrote me by email at [email protected]
Follow the momentum
Biedrs kopš
183 ieraksti
Oct 02, 2013 at 14:14
Biedrs kopš
183 ieraksti
do you still need help with this?
http://www.freeforexrebates .info
Biedrs kopš
7 ieraksti
Oct 05, 2013 at 10:36
Biedrs kopš
7 ieraksti
No, since then i learned to program MQL4 language at very advanced level now, since i had some background in programming.And i did it myself, unfortunately the results were bad.But anyway thanks for help!
It's all about bucks, kid. The rest is conversation...
Biedrs kopš
1601 ieraksti
Oct 05, 2013 at 15:48
Biedrs kopš
1601 ieraksti
If trading was just that simple... This idea has been created ages ago.
1) How to improve it?
Backtest... and try to add filters you will avoid loosers trades
This strategy is not suitable for 5 to 30 min timeframes.
1) How to improve it?
Backtest... and try to add filters you will avoid loosers trades
This strategy is not suitable for 5 to 30 min timeframes.
Biedrs kopš
39 ieraksti
Oct 20, 2013 at 07:12
Biedrs kopš
39 ieraksti
Why does everyone talk backtest when you can run live on a demo account?
All this back testing never did anyone I know any good, except scammers who use it to fool people.
All this back testing never did anyone I know any good, except scammers who use it to fool people.
Biedrs kopš
189 ieraksti
Oct 21, 2013 at 16:43
Biedrs kopš
189 ieraksti
in my profile you can see live real and demo accounts
Follow the momentum

forex_trader_157590
Biedrs kopš
1 ieraksti
Oct 22, 2013 at 09:04
Biedrs kopš
1 ieraksti
skaboy posted:
Why does everyone talk backtest when you can run live on a demo account?
All this back testing never did anyone I know any good, except scammers who use it to fool people.
Back testing is crucial, but so is forward testing. Back testing allows you to learn the limitations and problems with automated strategies that would take hundreds of years to learn with just forward testing.
Forward testing only allows you to test the current volatility in the market, when in reality volatility can vary hundreds of percent over time.
For instance during the housing bubble pop, many markets experienced volatility 4 or 5 times normal, that would have destroyed strategies only designed for today's volatility. Or the flash crash, is another example of volatility fluctuation. You're right about the scammers though.
John

*Spams netiks pieļauts, un tā rezultātā var slēgt kontu.
Tip: Posting an image/youtube url will automatically embed it in your post!
Tip: Type the @ sign to auto complete a username participating in this discussion.