898956 (By forex_trader_187024)
| Pieaugums | +123060.48% |
| Kritums (Drawdown) | 50.54% |
| Pipi: | 6462.5 |
| Darījumi | 2653 |
| Uzvaras |
|
| Zaudēt |
|
| Modelis Kvalitāte | 0.0% |
| Stieņi Test | 9494 |
| Ērces Modelētā | 18888 |
Forward Test
EA test
Diskusija
Jul 30, 2014 at 06:16
882 Views
3 Replies
forex_trader_187024
Biedrs kopš
5 ieraksti
Jul 30, 2014 at 06:51
The EA open or close trades only at the beginning of a new 1h bar, that's why the backtest use only bar-close data.
I personally don't trust the average backtests, especially those made with 'every tick' model type, most of the time the results are totally deceiving and fake, that's why my EA only open or close trades at the beginning of a bar, and not do nothing in between.
Enjoy!
I personally don't trust the average backtests, especially those made with 'every tick' model type, most of the time the results are totally deceiving and fake, that's why my EA only open or close trades at the beginning of a bar, and not do nothing in between.
Enjoy!
Biedrs kopš
14 ieraksti
Aug 18, 2014 at 15:22
Looks nice.
What data did you use for backtesting? MetaQuotes or Alpari?
What's going on before 2013?
What data did you use for backtesting? MetaQuotes or Alpari?
What's going on before 2013?
forex_trader_187024
Biedrs kopš
5 ieraksti
Aug 25, 2014 at 11:28
I used fxcm data, but the last 1,5 years is all the data i can get.
Biedrs kopš
814 ieraksti
Sep 07, 2014 at 11:00
Good Strategy. Still can improve, you write yourself the EA?
Can you explain how the logic of your ATR get IN and get OUT ?
Purely base on ATR only?
And your lot size open base on percentage of Balance or Equity?
Can you explain how the logic of your ATR get IN and get OUT ?
Purely base on ATR only?
And your lot size open base on percentage of Balance or Equity?
Information is Gold when come to organised.
*Spams netiks pieļauts, un tā rezultātā var slēgt kontu.
Tip: Posting an image/youtube url will automatically embed it in your post!
Tip: Type the @ sign to auto complete a username participating in this discussion.
