Signal Start apskata vērtējums
Signal Start
Aug 17, 2017 at 06:39
mranda posted:😐
I used them for a few month, but not doing it anymore. My reasons:
1. A lot of signal providers, who start with account of 10-50 USD, they make 'miraculous' one or two trades and suddenly their performance is 1000+%. They are not filtering those 'traders'.
2. You have no feedback about the system, if your signal provider is not trading, you have no chance to contact him/her to find out if it is intentional or not ... I was subscribed to one of them, with pretty nice history, payed 50USD/month, but 2 months from 3 he did not traded with no message to his followers ...
3. Support is very slow, nice, trying to response, but slow
4. You have no chance to discuss / rate signal providers ...
Anyway, a lot of my colleagues is using them and they are ok with ... for me, not very good.
Good luck to all
Aug 09, 2017 at 06:26
The site is awesome. It's what I've been looking for for some time now. It's well worth it.
Aug 06, 2017 at 07:19
fxfunder posted:
your costumer service is very very bad
you haven't answered more than 10 my mail yet .
your support is very bad
Dear fxfunder,
Your emails were answered 7 days ago, and the matter is being currently checked.
Aug 06, 2017 at 07:18
Since joining, to date, I have only incurred net losses. I have yet to see net profits!!!
Aug 06, 2017 at 07:11
your costumer service is very very bad
you haven't answered more than 10 my mail yet .
your support is very bad
you haven't answered more than 10 my mail yet .
your support is very bad
ninafxtrader@
Jul 27, 2017 at 06:29
Very bad signals. Should show the real performance.. Hiding the open trades is very deceiving to subscribers
Jul 19, 2017 at 11:48
mic29 posted:
Pros
good copy service.
don't have to worry about coping of trades. They are maintained with good software. 100% thumbs up.
Cons
Compared to other copy signal software, options about trades are very few and basic.
The listing of signals is terrible. A lot of scammers basically have found ways to to bring their signals to the top. They use 1000:1 or so leverage and cent account and take high risk and expects us to follow them with our 100:1 account.
many accounts make 2 to 5 pips winning trade but remember that copy software always lags and you lose .5 pips in opening trades and .5 pips in closing trades. So avoid signals which make a lot of small pips gains.
I have been following this platform for a long time and am about to leave because none of the signals in the Top hundred will ever make it to more than six months. All the blown signals are de listed and you have no idea of how many signals have blown off. I personally have a detailed record of more than 700 signals blowing of in the past nine months alone. Most of them were in the top 20 at some point. If you see all there signals today you will be amazed that there are no failures but reality is that a lot of signals not listed today were at number one at some point have failed and are now out of sight.
Also the statistics of the signals provider are very poor. Other platforms offer much deeper insight to the signal provider like how much money is been followed or how many subscribers.
The truth is not what is shown now. With hard earned money on the line take care and make good choices.
My record is at 5 months 3 days, and I've managed 26% DD tops, only once.
I also risk my hard earned money, unlike others. 52k equity.
I also manually trade about 18 hours per day.
PAM Fund (Mount Cook Financial). Please vouch for my system. “Learn from your mistakes and do not give up!”
Jul 19, 2017 at 06:56
I sent several emails to request refund for signals I did subscribe and that didn't provide practically signals during the period of time I paid for. I did receive only 2 refunds even if I sent an email requesting an evaluation for 4 of them. No additional reply from the customer service that only replied to one of my emails. Very poor and unacceptable. They should have a better internal evaluation of the signal providers.
Lūdzu ienāciet, lai komentētu.
