Edit Your Comment
Backtest and Reality
Участник с Mar 26, 2013
17 комментариев

forex_trader_28881
Участник с Feb 07, 2011
691 комментариев
May 19, 2013 at 11:48
(отредактировано May 19, 2013 at 11:53)
Участник с Feb 07, 2011
691 комментариев
Not MT.
Different CPU's will give different results. If you're online and offline will give a different result and MT makes up data as it goes along if there isn't any.
The back testing is useless.
You need to be on a proper language like JAVA and good data.
Higher time frames might be better, but I have never matched a single days trading to a back test for the same day. Try it, trade for a day or 5 then run a back test on those same 5 days and see if they are even close.
Different CPU's will give different results. If you're online and offline will give a different result and MT makes up data as it goes along if there isn't any.
The back testing is useless.
You need to be on a proper language like JAVA and good data.
Higher time frames might be better, but I have never matched a single days trading to a back test for the same day. Try it, trade for a day or 5 then run a back test on those same 5 days and see if they are even close.
Участник с Nov 21, 2011
1601 комментариев
May 19, 2013 at 13:37
Участник с Nov 21, 2011
1601 комментариев
It depends what kind of EA you are backtesting. If it's scalping then to do backtest you need to do this way.
http://eareview.net/tick-data
Backtest is more to check out how your EA is running in order to correct codes if it doesn't work properly.
http://eareview.net/tick-data
Backtest is more to check out how your EA is running in order to correct codes if it doesn't work properly.

forex_trader_100706
Участник с Nov 26, 2012
72 комментариев
May 19, 2013 at 17:54
Участник с Nov 26, 2012
72 комментариев
CrazyTrader posted:
It depends what kind of EA you are backtesting. If it's scalping then to do backtest you need to do this way.
http://eareview.net/tick-data
Backtest is more to check out how your EA is running in order to correct codes if it doesn't work properly.
There are much better ways than Birt's method.
http://www.tickstory.com/
Results from live and backtest do match if the EA is coded correctly to operate on per tick commands.

forex_trader_100706
Участник с Nov 26, 2012
72 комментариев
May 19, 2013 at 17:56
Участник с Nov 26, 2012
72 комментариев
jmlforex posted:
Do you trust backtest ?
Only a backtest that we do ourselves with our own EA. We can't trust others.
Участник с Nov 06, 2012
3 комментариев
May 19, 2013 at 19:54
Участник с Nov 06, 2012
3 комментариев
Nope. Never trust backtesting.
Участник с Nov 21, 2011
1601 комментариев
May 19, 2013 at 21:24
Участник с Nov 21, 2011
1601 комментариев
JohnKrema posted:
Nope. Never trust backtesting.
I do beleive my backtesting.
Finding the right parameters for a delimited period of time on a particular instrument doesn't mean you are going to win in live.
Участник с Nov 21, 2011
1601 комментариев
May 19, 2013 at 21:26
Участник с Nov 21, 2011
1601 комментариев
SiamFXNET posted:CrazyTrader posted:
It depends what kind of EA you are backtesting. If it's scalping then to do backtest you need to do this way.
http://eareview.net/tick-data
Backtest is more to check out how your EA is running in order to correct codes if it doesn't work properly.
There are much better ways than Birt's method.
http://www.tickstory.com/
Results from live and backtest do match if the EA is coded correctly to operate on per tick commands.
I have tested it, it's fast and really easy. Great tool thank you
Участник с Mar 28, 2011
84 комментариев
May 20, 2013 at 14:23
Участник с Mar 28, 2011
84 комментариев
I tested my EA for years back using only M1 open tick data and then run it on real account for two months and the results were pretty much the same we expected. We had about 5 trades a day, TP somewhere between 10-20 pips. Market orders only.
I used Forex Tester 2 for backtests because MT4 tester is so slow when you have more trades open (as we had). FT2 is about 10-100x faster depending how many open trades you have.
But it really depends on your strategy how to test it to get reliable results.
Sometimes it is favourable to just use bar close/open to do calculations because it filters out some spikes in tick data. And this speeds testing a lot!
I used Forex Tester 2 for backtests because MT4 tester is so slow when you have more trades open (as we had). FT2 is about 10-100x faster depending how many open trades you have.
But it really depends on your strategy how to test it to get reliable results.
Sometimes it is favourable to just use bar close/open to do calculations because it filters out some spikes in tick data. And this speeds testing a lot!
Being Bearish or Bullish Makes No Difference

forex_trader_128900
Участник с May 19, 2013
3 комментариев
May 20, 2013 at 19:53
Участник с May 19, 2013
3 комментариев
I have found backtesting on MT4 to be a useful guide on live performance, but you will get differences on live and backtested results, due to broker slippage, down time and other factors. And yes, backtesting on the bigger time frames gives more accurate results compared with live results.
Участник с Sep 20, 2012
100 комментариев
May 28, 2013 at 19:36
Участник с Sep 20, 2012
100 комментариев
Depends on modeling quality, type and timeframe of trading and broker for me
Участник с May 30, 2012
37 комментариев
May 29, 2013 at 09:04
Участник с May 30, 2012
37 комментариев
Does tick story fix that 4gb limitation on backtests? I remember I was using birt's method and not been able to test all the years of data consecutively was the only downside.
Участник с May 23, 2013
35 комментариев
Jun 06, 2013 at 19:35
Участник с May 23, 2013
35 комментариев
thanks, for the link it's great :)
Участник с Jul 24, 2012
4 комментариев
Jun 19, 2013 at 19:57
Участник с Jul 24, 2012
4 комментариев
i use BACKTEST but i don't like it because it shows me incredible results of my strategy . it's better to use it for watching how indicators moves .
don't give up
Участник с Apr 14, 2013
398 комментариев
Jun 19, 2013 at 23:07
Участник с Apr 14, 2013
398 комментариев
Backtesing proves several important points. One of the most important would be that humans fail to be consistent. We may have a system which works great for us in back test. Yet, in live our results never translate. In almost 100% of the cases it is because we gain bais to a certain position. Which in reality abandons the system which we are back testing. Many of us use "rules" just as we input them into indicators or EA's [If this happens, then do this] Yet in live it is very rare to do the same. All in all, to make great amount of money in forex. You must trade like a robot. That is with no BIAS, or emotion towards any direction.
Focus on pip-drawdown

forex_trader_65453
Участник с Feb 12, 2012
11 комментариев
Jun 21, 2013 at 16:12
Участник с Feb 12, 2012
11 комментариев
Hi, I developed over 500 EAs as software engeneer, for free for amateurs (a 95%) and for professionals (very few... and not in mql4)
My conclusion is simple, don't trust backtesting!
...a part it's only an amateur game, you can't do it in professional systems
My conclusion is simple, don't trust backtesting!
...a part it's only an amateur game, you can't do it in professional systems
Участник с Nov 21, 2011
1601 комментариев
Jun 21, 2013 at 16:26
Участник с Nov 21, 2011
1601 комментариев
Backtest is very usefull to check if what you developped works as it is supposed to do (entry, exist, sl, tp, loop....) in order to avoid some bad surprise in live.
Even if on MT4 you could get an easily 100% quality model, to be sussessfull while you backtest the past doesn't mean you will make profit in the future.
Even if on MT4 you could get an easily 100% quality model, to be sussessfull while you backtest the past doesn't mean you will make profit in the future.

forex_trader_65453
Участник с Feb 12, 2012
11 комментариев
Jun 22, 2013 at 08:10
Участник с Feb 12, 2012
11 комментариев
backtesting?
do you again believe in the 10 minutes money?
the multinationals spends every year bilions and bilions in analysts, engineers, full time employers, and you in ten minutes make the money
of course... you do the backtesting!
do you again believe in the 10 minutes money?
the multinationals spends every year bilions and bilions in analysts, engineers, full time employers, and you in ten minutes make the money
of course... you do the backtesting!

forex_trader_131982
Участник с Jun 06, 2013
9 комментариев
Jun 23, 2013 at 06:18
Участник с Jun 06, 2013
9 комментариев
Backtest with real tick data then....real tick data is just the same as a live market. The velocity of the price, the exact moment of price surging up and down and the the way the tick behaves are all recorded in a real tick data. Whomever said otherwise doesn't know what they are talking about/have limited knowledge.

forex_trader_65453
Участник с Feb 12, 2012
11 комментариев
Jun 23, 2013 at 11:01
Участник с Feb 12, 2012
11 комментариев
yes, of course.... and with 100 lines in mql4 you earn the word
I alway make a simple question... what's your job? are you this night to see how it starts and tomorrow to trade?
no, I immagine you are in your affidable backtesting... and doing another job to live!
I alway make a simple question... what's your job? are you this night to see how it starts and tomorrow to trade?
no, I immagine you are in your affidable backtesting... and doing another job to live!

*Коммерческое использование и спам не допускаются и могут привести к аннулированию аккаунта.
Совет: Размещенные изображения или ссылки на Youtube автоматически вставляются в ваше сообщение!
Совет: введите знак @ для автоматического заполнения имени пользователя, участвующего в этом обсуждении.