Advertisement
Trend Hunter Robot (By leapfx)
| Прибыль : | +1677.87% |
| Просадка | 21.45% |
| Пипс: | 25288.0 |
| Сделки | 479 |
| Выигрыш: |
|
| Потери: |
|
| Тип: | Реальный |
| Кредитное плечо: | 1:200 |
| Трейдинг: | Автоматически |
Trend Hunter Robot Обсуждение
Участник с Apr 21, 2013
258 комментариев
Sep 18, 2022 at 06:23
If anyone buys this please post your results. There are a number of LeapFX EA's that have very varied results based on things like broker, settings, etc
Участник с Jul 08, 2022
3 комментариев
Sep 26, 2022 at 12:12
What version is this One
Участник с Apr 20, 2022
9 комментариев
Sep 26, 2022 at 13:30
Backtesting with real ticks from dukascopy, and reduced spread multiplier of 0.6 gives very very bad results... Not really worth buying.
Участник с May 22, 2018
176 комментариев
Sep 27, 2022 at 14:35
Back tests are definitely not bad, and real testing not bad. If not getting correct results please email support@leapfx.com and we'll help you get it working properly.
Участник с Dec 10, 2010
8 комментариев
Oct 04, 2022 at 04:27
Backtesting ANY EA is a waste of time. Some people will never learn that.
I just installed this EA a few days ago and it is outperforming the one posted here. My broker is Tradersway.
I just installed this EA a few days ago and it is outperforming the one posted here. My broker is Tradersway.
Участник с Apr 20, 2022
9 комментариев
Oct 04, 2022 at 06:31
Totally agree. Show me that live and real account. Backtesting is very wise and important. So ignore the people that say otherwise.
Участник с Dec 10, 2010
8 комментариев
Oct 04, 2022 at 09:35
I have purchased several EA's from these guys; they honor their refund policy as they say. So... why not?
Участник с Jan 14, 2022
8 комментариев
Oct 04, 2022 at 11:17
Strange.. they always answer my questions. Yes depending of the EA I also have different results, but if I'm not happy by the end of the 30 days, they always refunded me, I have bought 4 EA's with them and asked for refund of 2, no problems and I keep testing
Участник с Sep 29, 2022
68 комментариев
Oct 04, 2022 at 11:51
I think the sale of EA did not work. And what's the problem? Well, besides the fact that the purchased adviser does not earn. The vast majority of advisors are not profitable. But their sale ... very often I notice that someone buys them, but then becomes dissatisfied.
Участник с May 22, 2018
176 комментариев
Oct 04, 2022 at 15:06
I think this Chris Poven guy has us confused with someone else.
1. We have no record of this guy as a customer.
2. We ALWAYS respond to customers and never block them.
3. If we block someone on here, it's because they are spamming or lying.
4. This guy registered 12 hours ago... probably a competitor.
Mouricio, registered 5 hours ago. We have no record of any customer name Mouricio. Another liar, probably same guy.
Ethan marks registered 20 minutes ago. Another fake post.
We always HONOR our refund. And we always provide support best we can.
In this business not all systems are for everyone. Many people can be happy with a system, and many people can be unhappy. That's why we offer multiple systems and offer refund guarantees that we honor so people can decide if it's a good fit or not.
1. We have no record of this guy as a customer.
2. We ALWAYS respond to customers and never block them.
3. If we block someone on here, it's because they are spamming or lying.
4. This guy registered 12 hours ago... probably a competitor.
Mouricio, registered 5 hours ago. We have no record of any customer name Mouricio. Another liar, probably same guy.
Ethan marks registered 20 minutes ago. Another fake post.
We always HONOR our refund. And we always provide support best we can.
In this business not all systems are for everyone. Many people can be happy with a system, and many people can be unhappy. That's why we offer multiple systems and offer refund guarantees that we honor so people can decide if it's a good fit or not.
Участник с Jul 31, 2022
3 комментариев
Oct 09, 2022 at 01:03
Refund not work - a play on words from a lying seller
Участник с Aug 27, 2016
41 комментариев
Nov 03, 2022 at 11:01
wolfeman posted:
Backtesting ANY EA is a waste of time. Some people will never learn that.
I just installed this EA a few days ago and it is outperforming the one posted here. My broker is Tradersway.
can you share myfxbook of your account?
Trade to live another day
Участник с Jun 27, 2014
98 комментариев
Jan 18, 2023 at 08:49
What happened on July 21, 2022?
You haven't been around lately.
Участник с May 22, 2018
176 комментариев
Jan 18, 2023 at 15:33
Nothing major just some drawdown on USDMXN the pip calculation is different for USDMXN. For example 10 pips on EURUSD can be measured on anotehr pair like GOLD or USDMXN differently , because of more decimals. In myfxbook it looks like more drawdown but it's not.
Участник с Sep 24, 2018
22 комментариев
May 02, 2023 at 19:20
Disappointing. I bought the EA, they deliver a bunch of set files with it (84 overall, 13 for EURUSD alone), but no explanation what each set file is good for.
So I asked the support, they basically answered "RTFM", while the questions are not answered in the manual (one of the four was, to be fair - my bad). No answer since.
Also no multicurrency setup for MT5, only fixed lot money management.
So far my judgement:
+ Pretty flexible, you can fine tune yourself with the strategy tester
+ Looks good in this account
o Fair manual which explains the setup and strategy reasonably well
o Bunch of set files delivered with it, which have no clear description
o Basic members area on their website
- Multiple instances needed even on MT5
- Manual testing or even optimization is needed
In the end I feel it's just a cheap accumulation of indicators which I can also write myself. I expected to benefit from the knowledge of the authors, but it doesn't seem like that so far.
So I asked the support, they basically answered "RTFM", while the questions are not answered in the manual (one of the four was, to be fair - my bad). No answer since.
Also no multicurrency setup for MT5, only fixed lot money management.
So far my judgement:
+ Pretty flexible, you can fine tune yourself with the strategy tester
+ Looks good in this account
o Fair manual which explains the setup and strategy reasonably well
o Bunch of set files delivered with it, which have no clear description
o Basic members area on their website
- Multiple instances needed even on MT5
- Manual testing or even optimization is needed
In the end I feel it's just a cheap accumulation of indicators which I can also write myself. I expected to benefit from the knowledge of the authors, but it doesn't seem like that so far.
Участник с May 22, 2018
176 комментариев
May 03, 2023 at 17:55
Not sure - the communication was clear , but if you didn't get a clear enough explanation you can email again and ask for clarification.
Участник с Sep 24, 2018
22 комментариев
May 03, 2023 at 18:24
Your answer was: "Please read the manual it tells you which pairs to use and which set files."
And yes, it tells me which pairs to use, while you use different pairs in this account. The manual does not tell me which set files to use. And the backtests on your website are also for some set files but it's unclear for which. For example EURUSD comes with 13 set files but 3 backtests, and it's not clear for which those are.
So I still don't know what set files are used in this account, I still don't know which second account you are talking about , I still don't know what in your eyes speaks against ICMarkets, and I still don't know what all those different set files are and which ones you recommend to use.
And yes, it tells me which pairs to use, while you use different pairs in this account. The manual does not tell me which set files to use. And the backtests on your website are also for some set files but it's unclear for which. For example EURUSD comes with 13 set files but 3 backtests, and it's not clear for which those are.
So I still don't know what set files are used in this account, I still don't know which second account you are talking about , I still don't know what in your eyes speaks against ICMarkets, and I still don't know what all those different set files are and which ones you recommend to use.
Участник с Oct 20, 2017
5 комментариев
May 04, 2023 at 07:53
(отредактировано May 04, 2023 at 07:56)
Use any of this eurusd set or choose any set between 84 sets. You got the options. If you wandering what would be the best set or sets for you test all inside strategy tester. For starting date choose 01.01.2021 up to to today's date. During the test wach history tab to check how those set performing, what would be the biggest profit or loss and so on. Then pick one set for your trading. Before start with the testing download all tick deta, bid ask date , high low date, m1, m2, an so on up to week date. For testing use MT5. But if you don't want too do this, I mean on the testing all sets or some of those set, simply use default settings on EURUSD on H1. Or use any of these sets. Ther is no favorite set or sets. All sets are good.
Участник с Sep 24, 2018
22 комментариев
May 04, 2023 at 17:03
Well I understand how backtesting works.
But I find it quite cheap to provide 84 set files without any description, to provide backtests for different set files. I don't know whether they have correlations, so if use 12 EURUSD sets, will maybe 6 trades open at the same time? This would have an impact on the risk settings. Or to be more precise on the lot size, because there is no automatic selection of the risk size.
Of course, I can also backtest everything myself. But for 800 bucks I would expect a much more clear delivery. It's not hard, it's just work that now every customer has to do by himself.
But I find it quite cheap to provide 84 set files without any description, to provide backtests for different set files. I don't know whether they have correlations, so if use 12 EURUSD sets, will maybe 6 trades open at the same time? This would have an impact on the risk settings. Or to be more precise on the lot size, because there is no automatic selection of the risk size.
Of course, I can also backtest everything myself. But for 800 bucks I would expect a much more clear delivery. It's not hard, it's just work that now every customer has to do by himself.
Участник с Oct 20, 2017
5 комментариев
May 05, 2023 at 09:49
blackmole posted:
Well I understand how backtesting works.
But I find it quite cheap to provide 84 set files without any description, to provide backtests for different set files. I don't know whether they have correlations, so if use 12 EURUSD sets, will maybe 6 trades open at the same time? This would have an impact on the risk settings. Or to be more precise on the lot size, because there is no automatic selection of the risk size.
Of course, I can also backtest everything myself. But for 800 bucks I would expect a much more clear delivery. It's not hard, it's just work that now every customer has to do by himself.
Okay, I understand what you want to say. You don't have to test the set files if you don't want to. What you have to do is determine the level of risk. So, if you use several sets on one currency pair, it is desirable to set a lower risk, i.e. a fixed lot size, nothing else.
