Contest - BALLZTRADER (由 forex_trader_30609)
| 收益 : | -99.9% |
| 缩减 | 100.00% |
| 点: | -244.6 |
| 交易 | 131 |
| 赢得: |
|
| 损失:。 |
|
| 类型: | 演示 |
| 杠杆率: | 1:500 |
| 交易: | 未知 |
Contest - BALLZTRADER讨论
Mar 16, 2011 at 09:21
BTW: ALAPRI > MAXIMUM OPEN POSITION NO LIMITS look:
https://www.alpari.co.uk/en/trading_accounts/account_comparison_table.html
so possible !!!
https://www.alpari.co.uk/en/trading_accounts/account_comparison_table.html
so possible !!!
Mar 16, 2011 at 10:20
I was wondering why other participants are so much concerned about Lot sizes and trying to compare it with Real account. This is just a competition and everyone has a choice of selecting huge lots. Suppose if Ballztrader would have wiped out his account using these huge lots how many of you would be shouting here ??
Still 2 weeks are left ... Get back to trading and winning .. cheers ... !!!! Best of Luck to everyone.
Still 2 weeks are left ... Get back to trading and winning .. cheers ... !!!! Best of Luck to everyone.
Never Give up !!
Mar 16, 2011 at 10:51
ghi001 posted:
BTW: ALAPRI > MAXIMUM OPEN POSITION NO LIMITS look:
https://www.alpari.co.uk/en/trading_accounts/account_comparison_table.html
so possible !!!
Yes it is possible
Mar 16, 2011 at 10:57
(已编辑 Mar 16, 2011 at 10:57)
fxandme posted:
I was wondering why other participants are so much concerned about Lot sizes and trying to compare it with Real account. This is just a competition and everyone has a choice of selecting huge lots. Suppose if Ballztrader would have wiped out his account using these huge lots how many of you would be shouting here ??
Still 2 weeks are left ... Get back to trading and winning .. cheers ... !!!! Best of Luck to everyone.
You are correct my friend
forex_trader_30609
会员从Feb 28, 2011开始
3帖子
Mar 16, 2011 at 19:01
(已编辑 Mar 16, 2011 at 19:03)
The market is so erratic now because of this yen story. It fell below 80 though many investment banks had been been saying it would not.
Mar 16, 2011 at 22:52
The market has known for months that there were some massive option-related stop-losses below the previous lows at 79.75 and unfortunately those losses were triggered at the most illiquid time of the day, NY close/Sydney open. The market probably moved 3 times more than would have been the case were both Europe and NY in full flow.
会员从Feb 25, 2010开始
95帖子
Mar 16, 2011 at 23:59
A little scary how you would now owe the broker $129,247.31. One would think a margin call would be initiated regardless of a gap down.
会员从Feb 16, 2011开始
2帖子
Mar 17, 2011 at 00:29
wowwwwwww....
one day in top and one day buttom
one day in top and one day buttom
keep spirit
会员从Feb 17, 2011开始
12帖子
Mar 17, 2011 at 02:44
don't know what buttom means but yes, unlucky
Gotta make that cash money bitchez
会员从Feb 16, 2011开始
2帖子
Mar 17, 2011 at 03:07
jimmyneutron88 posted:sorry I mean bottom 😀
don't know what buttom means but yes, unlucky
keep spirit
会员从Feb 17, 2011开始
12帖子
Mar 17, 2011 at 04:13
ah hah. of course. Eh, bringing me that much closer to No. 1, just need a few more people to off themselves in the top 20.. Hmmm
Gotta make that cash money bitchez
Mar 17, 2011 at 05:25
What gap? This dude lost his money fair and square. That's what you get when you have 5 open trades of 1000 lots each and get a margin call. I guess the stopout level must be 100% or even more.
Clearpaper posted:
A little scary how you would now owe the broker $129,247.31. One would think a margin call would be initiated regardless of a gap down.
会员从Feb 25, 2010开始
95帖子
Mar 17, 2011 at 10:01
amelabs posted:I'm not stating that the loss was unfair. And it was likely there was no stoploss set.
What gap? This dude lost his money fair and square. That's what you get when you have 5 open trades of 1000 lots each and get a margin call. I guess the stopout level must be 100% or even more.Clearpaper posted:
A little scary how you would now owe the broker $129,247.31. One would think a margin call would be initiated regardless of a gap down.
The only way you can end up with a negative balance is that there was no price available at the point when the margin call had to be activated, i.e. gap.
