要使用聊天,请登录。

Inertia Trader (由 babyjake1961 )

该用户已经删除了这个系统。

Inertia Trader讨论

expert2
Oct 18 2017 at 05:19
70帖子
HMSTOMAHAWKTRD
Oct 19 2017 at 06:42
24帖子
This Ea is falling drawdown of 50% is a terrible falling

babyjake1961
Oct 19 2017 at 08:22
70帖子
If you worry about this drawdown, your greed should not prevent you from lowering the lot size on your account.

vontogr (togr)
Oct 19 2017 at 14:27
4862帖子
HMSTOMAHAWKTRD posted:
This Ea is falling drawdown of 50% is a terrible falling


see my post

vontogr (togr) Sep 25 at 09:18

HMSTOMAHAWKTRD
Oct 19 2017 at 14:30
24帖子
This only explains that any is no promising in the long run and it is not a machine to make money are tools that help but it is very closely monitored in the end maybe one doing manual trading has better control of risks is my opinion

stefanosb73
Oct 19 2017 at 14:44
7帖子
This a very good ea but as every really good thing you must give it the time. Backtest are same as real. one of the few.

vontogr (togr)
Oct 20 2017 at 08:56
4862帖子
stefanosb73 posted:
This a very good ea but as every really good thing you must give it the time. Backtest are same as real. one of the few.

Since August 09 it has already lost half of the capital
-$476307.04

ernestolavi
Oct 20 2017 at 08:56
6帖子
I don't like your Trading, I think is very risk,.. Your DD is 54.21%, What is the safe in your trading?

HMSTOMAHAWKTRD
Oct 22 2017 at 06:30
24帖子
stefanosb73 posted:
This a very good ea but as every really good thing you must give it the time. Backtest are same as real. one of the few.


I respect your opinion but the system has lost almost half of the capital in a month ... I do not think it is a safe system .... if the idea is to work with less risk then what is the sense of trusting a system ?? ? this the only thing that proves is that the system is not reliable is not being reliable

Philip Hoang (N3mo)
Oct 22 2017 at 06:36
25帖子
togr posted:
stefanosb73 posted:
This a very good ea but as every really good thing you must give it the time. Backtest are same as real. one of the few.

Since August 09 it has already lost half of the capital
-$476307.04


Judging the performance of an ea in 2 months vs 16 months. Which do you think is more reliable.

HMSTOMAHAWKTRD
Oct 22 2017 at 14:24
24帖子
N3mo posted:
togr posted:
stefanosb73 posted:
This a very good ea but as every really good thing you must give it the time. Backtest are same as real. one of the few.

Since August 09 it has already lost half of the capital
-$476307.04


Judging the performance of an ea in 2 months vs 16 months. Which do you think is more reliable.


it is not about measuring performance forex to be a market so changing the only thing that at least for me proves is that you can not trust this system ... worse than in a month the system collapses what was done in 9 months. ... before is a system that might not be so safe and dangerous

babyjake1961
Oct 22 2017 at 16:11
70帖子
This live test uses high risk. If you are desperate for a quick buck, the system under high risk punches you right in the face and watches your jaws bleed while laughing in your face at your desperation.

Philip Hoang (N3mo)
Oct 23 2017 at 06:19
25帖子
HMSTOMAHAWKTRD posted:
N3mo posted:
togr posted:
stefanosb73 posted:
This a very good ea but as every really good thing you must give it the time. Backtest are same as real. one of the few.

Since August 09 it has already lost half of the capital
-$476307.04


Judging the performance of an ea in 2 months vs 16 months. Which do you think is more reliable.


it is not about measuring performance forex to be a market so changing the only thing that at least for me proves is that you can not trust this system ... worse than in a month the system collapses what was done in 9 months. ... before is a system that might not be so safe and dangerous


I see, you can send your copy of the bot to my email [email protected], since I'm assuming you won't be using it anymore. I thank you in advance you kind person. I will further discuss my account number in private. :)

HMSTOMAHAWKTRD
Oct 23 2017 at 06:20
24帖子
babyjake1961 posted:
This live test uses high risk. If you are desperate for a quick buck, the system under high risk punches you right in the face and watches your jaws bleed while laughing in your face at your desperation.


from a critical position my objective is to criticize that these systems are marketed and sold carrying the idea that they can do everything in forex and reality shows otherwise ... if it is a high risk test then what is the grace to show or better said where is the virtue of this system .... on your seller page you show this system as very powerful and reality shows that 9 months of profitability practically have just been destroyed in a month ... the same I have seen in other systems that are marketed I do not see clearly where this 'the only thing' that you try to sell or that makes it supremely different from the others

vontogr (togr)
Oct 23 2017 at 06:28
4862帖子
N3mo posted:
togr posted:
stefanosb73 posted:
This a very good ea but as every really good thing you must give it the time. Backtest are same as real. one of the few.

Since August 09 it has already lost half of the capital
-$476307.04


Judging the performance of an ea in 2 months vs 16 months. Which do you think is more reliable.


So it is even worse
when it lost 50% in only 2 months it can loose 100% in 4 months

babyjake1961
Oct 23 2017 at 10:25
70帖子
How did you fail to see the exact same drawdown with this risk level on backtests on multiple occasions?

Philip Hoang (N3mo)
Oct 23 2017 at 14:16
25帖子
togr posted:
N3mo posted:
togr posted:
stefanosb73 posted:
This a very good ea but as every really good thing you must give it the time. Backtest are same as real. one of the few.

Since August 09 it has already lost half of the capital
-$476307.04


Judging the performance of an ea in 2 months vs 16 months. Which do you think is more reliable.


So it is even worse
when it lost 50% in only 2 months it can loose 100% in 4 months


Judging by your 2nd grade math, I no longer want to discuss this any further. Have a good day.

HMSTOMAHAWKTRD
Oct 23 2017 at 14:56
24帖子
babyjake1961 posted:
How did you fail to see the exact same drawdown with this risk level on backtests on multiple occasions?


it is of little use that a system shows me profitability in past months if in a few months it goes into high loss ... that's where I see insecure and dangerous ... although this system has not used martingale the last three months has only lost followed that is where I see very dangerous to trust in these systems similar to the martingale in final result that they are able to pulverize an account in a short time and that you handle thousands of dollars tell me a person of the common that does not have similar capital lasts a few months alive and of no avail to enter into forex to move 0.01 lot at risk because growing an eternal serious account there is where I see that these systems fail despite everything we try to sell the final system that can with all in the market

braddock
Oct 29 2017 at 17:51
239帖子
why the dd shows only 4,8%?, thats not correct!!!

babyjake1961
Oct 29 2017 at 19:21
70帖子
I assume it's a MyFXBook glitch. Click on 'Full report' to see the actual drawdown.

请登录以发表评论。