Inertia Trader (โดย babyjake1961)

ผู้ใช้ได้ลบระบบนี้

Inertia Trader การสนทนา

May 19, 2016 at 17:49
11,503 การดู
276 Replies
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 31, 2016   70 โพสต์
Oct 19, 2017 at 08:22
If you worry about this drawdown, your greed should not prevent you from lowering the lot size on your account.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 22, 2011   4862 โพสต์
Oct 19, 2017 at 14:27
HMSTOMAHAWKTRD posted:
This Ea is falling drawdown of 50% is a terrible falling

see my post

vontogr (togr) Sep 25 at 09:18
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 25, 2017   29 โพสต์
Oct 19, 2017 at 14:30
This only explains that any is no promising in the long run and it is not a machine to make money are tools that help but it is very closely monitored in the end maybe one doing manual trading has better control of risks is my opinion
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 11, 2016   7 โพสต์
Oct 19, 2017 at 14:44
This a very good ea but as every really good thing you must give it the time. Backtest are same as real. one of the few.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 22, 2011   4862 โพสต์
Oct 20, 2017 at 08:56
stefanosb73 posted:
This a very good ea but as every really good thing you must give it the time. Backtest are same as real. one of the few.
Since August 09 it has already lost half of the capital
-$476307.04
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 11, 2013   6 โพสต์
Oct 20, 2017 at 08:56
I don't like your Trading, I think is very risk,.. Your DD is 54.21%, What is the safe in your trading?
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 25, 2017   29 โพสต์
Oct 22, 2017 at 06:30
stefanosb73 posted:
This a very good ea but as every really good thing you must give it the time. Backtest are same as real. one of the few.

I respect your opinion but the system has lost almost half of the capital in a month ... I do not think it is a safe system .... if the idea is to work with less risk then what is the sense of trusting a system ?? ? this the only thing that proves is that the system is not reliable is not being reliable
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Apr 14, 2015   26 โพสต์
Oct 22, 2017 at 06:36
togr posted:
stefanosb73 posted:
This a very good ea but as every really good thing you must give it the time. Backtest are same as real. one of the few.
Since August 09 it has already lost half of the capital
-$476307.04

Judging the performance of an ea in 2 months vs 16 months. Which do you think is more reliable.
phi.wkumarketing@
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 25, 2017   29 โพสต์
Oct 22, 2017 at 14:24
N3mo posted:
togr posted:
stefanosb73 posted:
This a very good ea but as every really good thing you must give it the time. Backtest are same as real. one of the few.
Since August 09 it has already lost half of the capital
-$476307.04

Judging the performance of an ea in 2 months vs 16 months. Which do you think is more reliable.

it is not about measuring performance forex to be a market so changing the only thing that at least for me proves is that you can not trust this system ... worse than in a month the system collapses what was done in 9 months. ... before is a system that might not be so safe and dangerous
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 31, 2016   70 โพสต์
Oct 22, 2017 at 16:11
This live test uses high risk. If you are desperate for a quick buck, the system under high risk punches you right in the face and watches your jaws bleed while laughing in your face at your desperation.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Apr 14, 2015   26 โพสต์
Oct 23, 2017 at 06:19
HMSTOMAHAWKTRD posted:
N3mo posted:
togr posted:
stefanosb73 posted:
This a very good ea but as every really good thing you must give it the time. Backtest are same as real. one of the few.
Since August 09 it has already lost half of the capital
-$476307.04

Judging the performance of an ea in 2 months vs 16 months. Which do you think is more reliable.

it is not about measuring performance forex to be a market so changing the only thing that at least for me proves is that you can not trust this system ... worse than in a month the system collapses what was done in 9 months. ... before is a system that might not be so safe and dangerous

I see, you can send your copy of the bot to my email [email protected], since I'm assuming you won't be using it anymore. I thank you in advance you kind person. I will further discuss my account number in private. :)
phi.wkumarketing@
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 25, 2017   29 โพสต์
Oct 23, 2017 at 06:20
babyjake1961 posted:
This live test uses high risk. If you are desperate for a quick buck, the system under high risk punches you right in the face and watches your jaws bleed while laughing in your face at your desperation.

from a critical position my objective is to criticize that these systems are marketed and sold carrying the idea that they can do everything in forex and reality shows otherwise ... if it is a high risk test then what is the grace to show or better said where is the virtue of this system .... on your seller page you show this system as very powerful and reality shows that 9 months of profitability practically have just been destroyed in a month ... the same I have seen in other systems that are marketed I do not see clearly where this 'the only thing' that you try to sell or that makes it supremely different from the others
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 22, 2011   4862 โพสต์
Oct 23, 2017 at 06:28
N3mo posted:
togr posted:
stefanosb73 posted:
This a very good ea but as every really good thing you must give it the time. Backtest are same as real. one of the few.
Since August 09 it has already lost half of the capital
-$476307.04

Judging the performance of an ea in 2 months vs 16 months. Which do you think is more reliable.

So it is even worse
when it lost 50% in only 2 months it can loose 100% in 4 months
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 31, 2016   70 โพสต์
Oct 23, 2017 at 10:25
How did you fail to see the exact same drawdown with this risk level on backtests on multiple occasions?
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Apr 14, 2015   26 โพสต์
Oct 23, 2017 at 14:16
togr posted:
N3mo posted:
togr posted:
stefanosb73 posted:
This a very good ea but as every really good thing you must give it the time. Backtest are same as real. one of the few.
Since August 09 it has already lost half of the capital
-$476307.04

Judging the performance of an ea in 2 months vs 16 months. Which do you think is more reliable.

So it is even worse
when it lost 50% in only 2 months it can loose 100% in 4 months

Judging by your 2nd grade math, I no longer want to discuss this any further. Have a good day.
phi.wkumarketing@
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 25, 2017   29 โพสต์
Oct 23, 2017 at 14:56
babyjake1961 posted:
How did you fail to see the exact same drawdown with this risk level on backtests on multiple occasions?

it is of little use that a system shows me profitability in past months if in a few months it goes into high loss ... that's where I see insecure and dangerous ... although this system has not used martingale the last three months has only lost followed that is where I see very dangerous to trust in these systems similar to the martingale in final result that they are able to pulverize an account in a short time and that you handle thousands of dollars tell me a person of the common that does not have similar capital lasts a few months alive and of no avail to enter into forex to move 0.01 lot at risk because growing an eternal serious account there is where I see that these systems fail despite everything we try to sell the final system that can with all in the market
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ May 03, 2012   239 โพสต์
Oct 29, 2017 at 17:51
why the dd shows only 4,8%?, thats not correct!!!
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 31, 2016   70 โพสต์
Oct 29, 2017 at 19:21
I assume it's a MyFXBook glitch. Click on 'Full report' to see the actual drawdown.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 23, 2016   85 โพสต์
Oct 29, 2017 at 21:25
babyjake1961 posted:
I assume it's a MyFXBook glitch. Click on 'Full report' to see the actual drawdown.
I've had quite a few glitches with mine. My funnel account was showing over 300% and it never had that much. At one point when I had deposited money, it showed a loss even though there wasn't one.
Choose a good reputation over great riches (PROVERBS 22:1)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 09, 2017   11 โพสต์
Nov 22, 2017 at 07:37
happytraderww posted:
I agree that the entries this EA provides is nothing short of impressive. World class indeed. However, it sometime gives up very good profits in the quest for more profits and ended up in the red. I would suggest that Mr Goldstein, the creator of this great EA to update this EA to allow users (with smaller risk appetite) an alternative option for a less aggressive Take-Profit strategy in order to secure more but smaller wins. In any case, I would certainly recommend the Inertia Trader.

I agree totally with the above statement. I added the EA at the wrong time to my account and have lost over 3K and can no longer trust it as I close out early on some trades to try and catch some profit and then finally let it run and hit SL. I don't have the time to watch this EA like a hawk. I have removed from my account and would like the creator to update the EA with the above changes so I can then trust it and add it back to my account. I would not only like to get my money back but would also like to cover the cost of what I paid for the EA.
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*การใช้งานเชิงพาณิชย์และสแปมจะไม่ได้รับการยอมรับ และอาจส่งผลให้บัญชีถูกยกเลิก
เคล็ดลับ: การโพสต์รูปภาพ/youtube url จะฝังลงในโพสต์ของคุณโดยอัตโนมัติ!
เคล็ดลับ: พิมพ์เครื่องหมาย @ เพื่อป้อนชื่อผู้ใช้ที่เข้าร่วมการสนทนานี้โดยอัตโนมัติ