Advertisement
Hyperactivity
forex_trader_107338
Jan 18, 2013 부터 멤버
게시물22
May 12, 2014 at 06:32
Hi,
Excuse me for the PM.
I saw your post in the IC markets thread regarding Hyperactivity.
This limit of 2000 messages, is that in the "Journal" section of the MT4 platform?
I wonder because I have my fxbook update set to update every 5 minutes.
Excuse me for the PM.
I saw your post in the IC markets thread regarding Hyperactivity.
This limit of 2000 messages, is that in the "Journal" section of the MT4 platform?
I wonder because I have my fxbook update set to update every 5 minutes.
May 12, 2014 at 08:54
Hi,
I guess it is number of order modification.
So trade opening, SL,TP changing etc.
The limit is about 7,000/day - at least that was msg from my broker.
Some brokers will block your account when you are over limit without notifying you.
Some do notify you upfront
Some do not limit you at all...
I guess it is number of order modification.
So trade opening, SL,TP changing etc.
The limit is about 7,000/day - at least that was msg from my broker.
Some brokers will block your account when you are over limit without notifying you.
Some do notify you upfront
Some do not limit you at all...
Jun 03, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물675
May 12, 2014 at 09:38
Damn brokers! :)
PAMM MANAGER // Professional Fund Manager
forex_trader_107338
Jan 18, 2013 부터 멤버
게시물22
May 12, 2014 at 09:54
Ok thanks.
That's something else I need to be aware of.
That's something else I need to be aware of.
Jun 03, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물675
Jun 16, 2014 at 08:51
It is very unfair that brokers doesn't allow hiperactivity.
PAMM MANAGER // Professional Fund Manager
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1409
Jun 17, 2014 at 16:07
Every order request requires bandwidth at their end, if they don't limit it then they can't guarantee performance for the traders that don't require hyperactivity.
Best regards Steve
Best regards Steve
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
forex_trader_28881
Feb 07, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물691
Jun 17, 2014 at 22:49
Steve,
The HFT's send about 1000 trade per second. So not only is it technically possible, it's a quite common practice in fact. And the HFT's are active in the forex market, I assure you.
Only some fxbrokers, iow's the bucket shops, will restrict your volumes.
The HFT's send about 1000 trade per second. So not only is it technically possible, it's a quite common practice in fact. And the HFT's are active in the forex market, I assure you.
Only some fxbrokers, iow's the bucket shops, will restrict your volumes.
Jun 18, 2014 at 07:10
TheCyclist posted:
Steve,
The HFT's send about 1000 trade per second. So not only is it technically possible, it's a quite common practice in fact. And the HFT's are active in the forex market, I assure you.
Only some fxbrokers, iow's the bucket shops, will restrict your volumes.
@TheCyclist
are you sure MT4 can open
...1000 trade per second...
In Journal I see that closing multiple positions could take tens or seconds.
Jun 03, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물675
Jun 18, 2014 at 08:05
That's not possible to open 1000+ trades at second. Even best VPS providers with cross-connection advertise (what may not be 100% sure) that they have 2ms execution speed.
So,
1sec = 1000ms
That gives at most 500 trades that I'm sure You will never get.
So,
1sec = 1000ms
That gives at most 500 trades that I'm sure You will never get.
PAMM MANAGER // Professional Fund Manager
Jun 18, 2014 at 08:13
adrian8891 posted:
That's not possible to open 1000+ trades at second. Even best VPS providers with cross-connection advertise (what may not be 100% sure) that they have 2ms execution speed.
So,
1sec = 1000ms
That gives at most 500 trades that I'm sure You will never get.
@adrian8891
It is even worse.
2ms you stated is just ping from your VPS to Broker server.
But trade needs to be executed which can take 250-1000ms.
There is a great MT4 tool - put it on your mt4 and you will see how much time is needed to just modify existing trade.
첨부 파일:
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1409
Jun 18, 2014 at 08:46
TheCyclist posted:
Steve,
The HFT's send about 1000 trade per second. So not only is it technically possible, it's a quite common practice in fact. And the HFT's are active in the forex market, I assure you.
Only some fxbrokers, iow's the bucket shops, will restrict your volumes.
I was simply commenting on why some brokers restrict client bandwidth, it's perfectly legitimate in my opinion. They don't all have bottomless pits of money to spend on infrastructure. Providing they make you aware of the circumstances you are trading under then I don't see the issue.
And look at it this way. The more a broker has to spend on infrastructure to support their business, the more money they have to skim off clients somewhere.
Best regards Steve
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
forex_trader_28881
Feb 07, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물691
Jun 18, 2014 at 09:25
(편집됨 Jun 18, 2014 at 09:34)
MT is a toy.
Of course you can't do it on MT. You need C++ and most likely FIX.
It requires things like microwave connections, inline functions and memory pointers. Special hardware etc...
Point is there is a case for very high volumes in FX. On 30 pairs you get about 25 000 to 40 000 ticks per pair per day, that's 1 000 000 value changes.
Make a 1 cent one...on a $10k account. Pharkers won't let me trade like that, MT is to slow and Oanda has volume restrictions, or I'd be sending them 1 million 1 unit trades a day.
To trade like that you need really big account and go straight interbank.
Of course you can't do it on MT. You need C++ and most likely FIX.
It requires things like microwave connections, inline functions and memory pointers. Special hardware etc...
Point is there is a case for very high volumes in FX. On 30 pairs you get about 25 000 to 40 000 ticks per pair per day, that's 1 000 000 value changes.
Make a 1 cent one...on a $10k account. Pharkers won't let me trade like that, MT is to slow and Oanda has volume restrictions, or I'd be sending them 1 million 1 unit trades a day.
To trade like that you need really big account and go straight interbank.
Jun 18, 2014 at 10:20
TheCyclist posted:
MT is a toy.
Of course you can't do it on MT. You need C++ and most likely FIX.
It requires things like microwave connections, inline functions and memory pointers. Special hardware etc...
Point is there is a case for very high volumes in FX. On 30 pairs you get about 25 000 to 40 000 ticks per pair per day, that's 1 000 000 value changes.
Make a 1 cent one...on a $10k account. Pharkers won't let me trade like that, MT is to slow and Oanda has volume restrictions, or I'd be sending them 1 million 1 unit trades a day.
To trade like that you need really big account and go straight interbank.
amazing but not related to hyperactivity
BTW is it worth it? I mean special devices, big account etc..
forex_trader_28881
Feb 07, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물691
Jun 19, 2014 at 00:38
Totally
It's worth hundreds of millions a year. HFT is big business.
What they do, and it's very likely to get stopped soon, is take advantage of time delays in old infrastructure. Orders always arrived at the BATS exchange first, but it takes a bit longer to get to NYSE or Nasdaq because of physical location.
These guys would then have a super optimized system to get to the rest of the exchanges first. So they would see what the order is on BATS, the order gets split, sent to other exchanges where the HFT guy already bought at the price the order was for if anything was available.
So there might have been 35 shares, he buys them and knows the order is coming and he knows how much the buyer will pay for stock. So he sells them again in the same millisecond. Of course as HFT started spreading it turned into a speed war...
Some of these companies pay $100 000 000 a year for orders to come thought them first.
IEX's Brad Katsuyama has a book out on it. He created the IEX exchange specifically to solve the problem.
As for the relation to hyperactivity, that definitely falls into the category of hyperactivity. Trying to do high volumes on platforms not designed for it. Doesn't mean it can't be done in fx, but MT is a toy as I said. Just doesn't have the speed.
It's worth hundreds of millions a year. HFT is big business.
What they do, and it's very likely to get stopped soon, is take advantage of time delays in old infrastructure. Orders always arrived at the BATS exchange first, but it takes a bit longer to get to NYSE or Nasdaq because of physical location.
These guys would then have a super optimized system to get to the rest of the exchanges first. So they would see what the order is on BATS, the order gets split, sent to other exchanges where the HFT guy already bought at the price the order was for if anything was available.
So there might have been 35 shares, he buys them and knows the order is coming and he knows how much the buyer will pay for stock. So he sells them again in the same millisecond. Of course as HFT started spreading it turned into a speed war...
Some of these companies pay $100 000 000 a year for orders to come thought them first.
IEX's Brad Katsuyama has a book out on it. He created the IEX exchange specifically to solve the problem.
As for the relation to hyperactivity, that definitely falls into the category of hyperactivity. Trying to do high volumes on platforms not designed for it. Doesn't mean it can't be done in fx, but MT is a toy as I said. Just doesn't have the speed.
forex_trader_28881
Feb 07, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물691
Jun 19, 2014 at 01:00
@adrian8891
What do you think Oanda does ? They handle far more than 1000 orders per second. Besides, these kind of guys typically put their servers in the same buildings as the exchanges. So there is no internet or VPS, just a cable from one computer to another.
What do you think Oanda does ? They handle far more than 1000 orders per second. Besides, these kind of guys typically put their servers in the same buildings as the exchanges. So there is no internet or VPS, just a cable from one computer to another.
forex_trader_28881
Feb 07, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물691
Jun 19, 2014 at 01:16
(편집됨 Jun 19, 2014 at 01:17)
Speed is a big issue for me. I find it very frustrating that I can't trade the way I want to in fx. O's API was quite fast, but they won't let me do volumes and they've written in a delay between closing different pairs.
I like to trade relationships, so I use to be able to get a target and close a position of say 30 trades before the next tick comes in, but now it takes 30 seconds. MT is just as slow, so that method of trading is out.
I like to trade relationships, so I use to be able to get a target and close a position of say 30 trades before the next tick comes in, but now it takes 30 seconds. MT is just as slow, so that method of trading is out.
Dec 15, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물784
Jun 19, 2014 at 01:33
(편집됨 Jun 19, 2014 at 01:34)
I swear thats what the Brokers did to MDP EA. I have the best servers and was doing so well and MDP got big and popular and then it seems the brokers added a delay to stop the MDP EA from working well. I dont trade any EA that requires a speed faster than 100ms. Its just not possible over the long haul. I have been there , done that and set my vps servers for it.
Click on my Name to see My Live Charts and Bio.
forex_trader_28881
Feb 07, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물691
Jun 19, 2014 at 01:55
I've given up, I trade every hour or so, the delays just doesn't matter then...
