Rating: Empty Star Empty Star Empty Star Empty Star Empty Star
Jarratt Davis;s student
Previous 1 2 3 Next
mmltd

Member Since Aug 04, 2017  30 posts Money Management (mmltd) Dec 26 2017 at 15:46
SwapTrader posted:
FXtrader2010 posted:
those who teach cant do, those who do don't teach


Really?


Obviously. There is more money to be made on the market if someone knows what he is doing than by teaching someone. If any trader spends time on mentoring from monday to friday, when he could be making 10 times the money by trading, he simply doesn't know how to trade.

Market is always right!
Adribaasmet

Member Since Aug 27, 2017  311 posts Adribaasmet Dec 26 2017 at 15:46
fxphysics posted:
Unless any self-proclaimed 'mentor' out there can show a self-owned, consistent, long-term third-party audited track-record spanning at least two years and hundreds of trades proving a viable profit expectancy, then he remains a total fraud in my book.

Free or paid does not matter one bit. Free will waste your time. Paid will waste both time & money.

How convenient to trade using 'fundamentals'. The theory can't be proven. Can't be disproven. Soft concepts like these are the mark of scammers.

Don't believe the hype and glossy websites, ask for proof. That long-term third-party audited track record is gold. That's why we're so few to have one. Let alone four.


So, what’s your guideline for the new Forex traders who want to learn Forex?

mmltd

Member Since Aug 04, 2017  30 posts Money Management (mmltd) Dec 26 2017 at 15:48
My message here got deleted. I posted that whoever can trade is not going to waste time by teaching others, but for whatever reason someone didn't like my message. For me thats confirmation I was right.

Market is always right!
mmltd

Member Since Aug 04, 2017  30 posts Money Management (mmltd) Dec 26 2017 at 15:48
Well, now its back...this forum can be weird sometimes. eek

Market is always right!
AniLorak

Member Since Apr 18, 2017  271 posts AniLorak Dec 27 2017 at 07:47
Dove777 posted:
AniLorak posted:
Dove777 posted:
JD's approach is using fundamentals. He has tons of video out there explaining his approach.


Thank you very much for you info! Is it free or paid service?


There are a couple of sources where you can get access to some free videos to understand JD's approach, his website Jarratt Davis and just do a search in you tube. The core training is a professional traders programme for $1997 which I believe is still offered at $997.
Jarrat's track record is verified and ranked by Barclay Hedge, a service that ranks professional fund managers.
 
https://imgur.com/7vFnhmY


Thank you very much for your info; now it’s time to research on him.

Dove777

Member Since Sep 01, 2016  10 posts Dove777 Dec 27 2017 at 07:49
Croco_Dile posted:

And all of them with very low or even negative returns ! fat
Lousy !


That is the best results professionals can deliver. You seem to suggest that your own performance is much better. Would you care to share your own verified results to demonstrate your comments are not hollow.

fxphysics

Member Since Aug 19, 2013  9 posts fxphysics Dec 27 2017 at 15:06
Adribaasmet posted:
fxphysics posted:
Unless any self-proclaimed 'mentor' out there can show a self-owned, consistent, long-term third-party audited track-record spanning at least two years and hundreds of trades proving a viable profit expectancy, then he remains a total fraud in my book.

Free or paid does not matter one bit. Free will waste your time. Paid will waste both time & money.

How convenient to trade using 'fundamentals'. The theory can't be proven. Can't be disproven. Soft concepts like these are the mark of scammers.

Don't believe the hype and glossy websites, ask for proof. That long-term third-party audited track record is gold. That's why we're so few to have one. Let alone four.


So, what’s your guideline for the new Forex traders who want to learn Forex?


My guideline is to learn mathematics and/or physics, and start learning how science (true science i.e. observable, replicable, univocal) can help you find a viable expectancy. The information is out there for free in currency terms. But you will have to pay with time and efforts.

A Universal Algorithm. A Trading Edge in ANY Market.
Dove777

Member Since Sep 01, 2016  10 posts Dove777 Dec 28 2017 at 12:00
fxphysics posted:
Adribaasmet posted:
fxphysics posted:
Unless any self-proclaimed 'mentor' out there can show a self-owned, consistent, long-term third-party audited track-record spanning at least two years and hundreds of trades proving a viable profit expectancy, then he remains a total fraud in my book.

Free or paid does not matter one bit. Free will waste your time. Paid will waste both time & money.

How convenient to trade using 'fundamentals'. The theory can't be proven. Can't be disproven. Soft concepts like these are the mark of scammers.

Don't believe the hype and glossy websites, ask for proof. That long-term third-party audited track record is gold. That's why we're so few to have one. Let alone four.


So, what’s your guideline for the new Forex traders who want to learn Forex?


My guideline is to learn mathematics and/or physics, and start learning how science (true science i.e. observable, replicable, univocal) can help you find a viable expectancy. The information is out there for free in currency terms. But you will have to pay with time and efforts.


So can your mathematics and/or physics be proven with third-party audited track-record spanning at least two years and hundreds of trades proving a viable profit expectancy?

Croco_Dile

Member Since Jan 08, 2016  272 posts Crocodile (Croco_Dile) Jan 04 at 05:27
Dove777 posted:
Croco_Dile posted:

And all of them with very low or even negative returns ! fat
Lousy !


That is the best results professionals can deliver. You seem to suggest that your own performance is much better. Would you care to share your own verified results to demonstrate your comments are not hollow.


Even with an ordinary robot under YOUR supervision, robot+YOU can deliver MUCH better results than those professionals !
And those robots are available FOR FREE on QLM5 site..... cool

All my results are verified, dear friend ! roll roll You just did not bother to look ! roll roll

Complexity is expensive, inefficient, and ineffective > Crocodile trading
Dove777

Member Since Sep 01, 2016  10 posts Dove777 Jan 04 at 11:33
Croco_Dile posted:
Dove777 posted:
Croco_Dile posted:

And all of them with very low or even negative returns ! fat
Lousy !


That is the best results professionals can deliver. You seem to suggest that your own performance is much better. Would you care to share your own verified results to demonstrate your comments are not hollow.


Even with an ordinary robot under YOUR supervision, robot+YOU can deliver MUCH better results than those professionals !
And those robots are available FOR FREE on QLM5 site..... cool

All my results are verified, dear friend ! roll roll You just did not bother to look ! roll roll


Talk is cheap. Give me the link to your 6 years of verified results.

Previous 1 2 3 Next
Credit Card Spending (YoY) (1h 42min)
PBOC set the Yuan reference rate at 6.83...(2 min ago)
EURUSD 1.17797 GBPUSD 1.32715
USDJPY 112.554 USDCAD 1.29026

Tools

Community

Reviews

Brokers

Platform

Support


Twitter |  Facebook |  Site Map  |  Terms  |   Privacy Policy
©2018 Myfxbook Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
HIGH RISK WARNING: Foreign exchange trading carries a high level of risk that may not be suitable for all investors. Leverage creates additional risk and loss exposure. Before you decide to trade foreign exchange, carefully consider your investment objectives, experience level, and risk tolerance. You could lose some or all of your initial investment; do not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. Educate yourself on the risks associated with foreign exchange trading, and seek advice from an independent financial or tax advisor if you have any questions. Any data and information is provided 'as is' solely for informational purposes, and is not intended for trading purposes or advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.