Advertisement
Flex EA - FlexHybrid - REAL (By flexea)
The user has deleted this system.
Flex EA - FlexHybrid - REAL Discussion
Sep 24, 2016 at 01:24
569 Views
3 Replies
forex_trader_29148
Member Since Feb 11, 2011
1768 posts
Oct 08, 2016 at 13:20
that's what happens to marti grids,sorry for your loss but that was meant to be
Member Since Nov 18, 2015
241 posts
Oct 10, 2016 at 16:29
i saw alot of non-martingale system blowed cus of recent GBP crush
Oct 11, 2016 at 06:30
successwill posted:
i saw alot of non-martingale system blowed cus of recent GBP crush
which happens not very often.... my account just had a loss but wasn't blowed.
My account also had a loss of 400 bucks but my flex bot gave me 1200 USD in a 5k account so that loss is ok, those big spikes are rare and were provoked by the remnants of brexit. Also Flex ea is not a full martingale system that can open infinite number of trades until it blows up your account, flex strategies only open a max number of 5 positions on the default strategy (haven't test flex hybrid) if the fifth position don't work next is the stop loss, so is a semi martingale system. And yeah it has a stop loss. Also the robot can sense when is getting ugly like a spike and close your open trades generally with a loss, so if the ADR is above 150 it will close your trades, or you can turn off that ADR option and ride the spike. I have another account with a flex default strategy that made a good profit with this last spike in GBPUSD, while my other account had a loss due to the high ADR, well this is forex, things can happen. To be honest i love this EA and it has made me happy since months using it. Overall, best martingale system i've tried, even though is semi martingale...
There is a new version of flex that i want to try but i haven't switch, with news filter.
*Commercial use and spam will not be tolerated, and may result in account termination.
Tip: Posting an image/youtube url will automatically embed it in your post!
Tip: Type the @ sign to auto complete a username participating in this discussion.
