To use chat, please login.
Back to contacts

FXSecret Immortal (By fx_skill )

Gain : +11294.22%
Drawdown 65.84%
Pips: 3918.0
Trades 2952
Won:
Lost:
Type: Real
Leverage: -
Trading: Automated

FXSecret Immortal Discussion

Nordquist & Carlander Solutions IBC
Elitetrading
Jun 25 2013 at 15:56
2 posts
Hello Sprecte Team,

no Trades on 24 and 25 Juni?

Regards

fx_skill
Jun 25 2013 at 20:39
57 posts
Elitetrading posted:
Hello Sprecte Team,

no Trades on 24 and 25 Juni?

Regards


Hello, Elitetrading. We have 3 open orders, they still in market so you can't see them in myfxbook, because of privacy setting 😄

willgart
Jul 04 2013 at 02:41
588 posts
why the first trades used more than 5lots and not the case after this?

fx_skill
Jul 04 2013 at 10:38
57 posts
Hi, willgart. For the first trades we used very aggressive parameters to show potential of Forex Spectre. We had set the EA on normal risk, and decreased the lot size.

willgart
Jul 04 2013 at 11:07
588 posts
Well...
this fake the results... you promote 2500% win in 1 week with huge risk...
at 5.3lots and your largest lost -150pip... it will be a 6000$ loss for a deposit or more than 50% of the account in 1 trade!

you should keep the same aggressive settings all the time to see the real trend.
or configure myfxbook to start the display as of june 14 when the configuration was normal.

but even this, the trades are interesting, we have to wait and see...

fx_skill
Jul 04 2013 at 14:54
57 posts
willgart, it's not a fake. We don't promise such profitability in trading with normal risk. We stating a fact that Forex Spectre earned such profit over a week. This profitability is possible with our EA, but we strongly do not recommend to trade such risks. However it is up to you.

Regards, Alex.

NairSys
Jul 04 2013 at 17:32
54 posts
apart from the first week showcase (which looks very much like manual trades) the performance of the EA has been nothing less than pathetic..losses had even digged into the first week profits today after struggling for a whole month beginning from June 3 till todate..

the vast contrast between the first week and the subsequent one month period has done more damage than good in promoting the product, which compelled others to bluntly call it 'fake'; i would call it a pseudo-result, given that the first week performance did not demonstrate a genuine trading condition but was inclined towards a gambling nature to produce a huge buffer for the EA to feed on..

rgds..

fx_skill
Jul 04 2013 at 21:13
57 posts
Hello, NairSys. I understand your hostility. But I can assure you that the trade was not manual. As an advanced trader, you know that the orders exhibited by hand can not have ID (Magic number). Here is screenshots from statement with ID (Magic number) for each order that was opened at first week. This is the proof that the trade was automatic.

The reason why the graph has ceased to grow so fast is that we had decreased the risks very much. We don't belive that any trading system can earn such money in long term.

Also as you know, drawdowns of systems with fixed lot happens and it is normal. Moreover, it can take several weeks. This drawback of all systems with fixed lot. But then profit will come.

Forex Spectre focuses on reliable and durable trading. That is why our EA works on backtest from 1999 - Unfortunately there is no way to test it over a longer period.

Best wishes, Alex.

Attachments:


NairSys
Jul 05 2013 at 06:14
54 posts
Well, Alex..to put it into perspective, magic numbers displayed here in myfxbook could only justify that the entries were sent thru' a script. As you know scripts are triggered manually and you could assign magic numbers to them. We can also use a script as an expert advisor. Depending on the codes, we can easily trigger the expert advisor manually to send an instant order by hitting the expert advisor on/off button. Therefore, your argument regarding magic numbers being proof that the trades were automated is a fallacy.

I sincerely hope that you'll do well in future as the performance has not moved forward since the first week, instead it has declined and moved backward during this month long period. In short, the results we see now were accrued in the first week and the contribution of the subsequent month long period pretty much amount to nothing if not the loss of time.

I'm not hostile, I remain..

fx_skill
Jul 05 2013 at 12:38
57 posts
Yes, you are right, magic number could be assigned through script. We provided all the proofs that we could.
Forex Spectre has earned for a couple of weeks 350% and now have a drawdown in 350% - it is normal for fixed lot trading (Profit according to start deposit). Advisor is designed for long-term trade.

'I sincerely hope that you'll do well in future' - Thank you😄

Best regards, Alex.

Please login to comment .