Pureprofitfx (के जरिए forex_trader_194159)
यूजर ने इस सिस्टम को रद्द कर दिया है.
Edit Your Comment
Pureprofitfx चर्चा करें
तबसे मेंबर है Jan 03, 2014
218 पोस्टों
Jul 30, 2014 at 19:49
तबसे मेंबर है Jan 03, 2014
218 पोस्टों
vinabao posted:
Can you explain to me about the
Gain:+413.4%
Abs. Gain:+99.68%
Those number is different means :
1- you withdraw fund from account .
2- you keep deposit more fund every time has big DD to make DD lower .
I dont see the withdraw at all so that means you keep deposit more fund each time bid DD to make DD lower ?
if that case would be bad for followers because most of followers dont have extra fund to rescues the DD that can cause blowup accounts .
Please explain why you keep deposit fund over times and why the 2 number above so much different .
(normally the best account should have 2 number the same except withdraw the fund ).
Thanks for the reply .
i asked him some days ago,he put more money in his account every week or month,he think forex is better for the stock.
so if u calculate earnings from the deposit original,it will be +413.4%.but calculate earnings from the deposit now,it will the +99%.

forex_trader_194159
तबसे मेंबर है Jun 09, 2014
38 पोस्टों
Jul 30, 2014 at 19:51
तबसे मेंबर है Jun 09, 2014
38 पोस्टों
vinabao posted:ahuruglica posted:
@vinabao
There were new deposits on the account that is why absolute gain is lower.
NO signal provider should deposit more fund to account when you have big DD at all .
99% of followers dont have extra fund to deposit to rescues account .
If SP keep deposit more fund to make DD number small than it is big NO NO .
Hope he would never do that .
I deposited when I wasn't in any default, so I didn't deposit it while others can't

forex_trader_178891
तबसे मेंबर है Feb 26, 2014
97 पोस्टों
Jul 30, 2014 at 20:34
तबसे मेंबर है Feb 26, 2014
97 पोस्टों
goode posted:vinabao posted:
Can you explain to me about the
Gain:+413.4%
Abs. Gain:+99.68%
Those number is different means :
1- you withdraw fund from account .
2- you keep deposit more fund every time has big DD to make DD lower .
I dont see the withdraw at all so that means you keep deposit more fund each time bid DD to make DD lower ?
if that case would be bad for followers because most of followers dont have extra fund to rescues the DD that can cause blowup accounts .
Please explain why you keep deposit fund over times and why the 2 number above so much different .
(normally the best account should have 2 number the same except withdraw the fund ).
Thanks for the reply .
i asked him some days ago,he put more money in his account every week or month,he think forex is better for the stock.
so if u calculate earnings from the deposit original,it will be +413.4%.but calculate earnings from the deposit now,it will the +99%.
May be you still dont understand about the Forex account and how it works .
If it is his account only than no one care .But when other people follow you than you should not deposit more fund at all (if you want you can put more fund in different account than copy trades as followers ).For example if you have $10 k first than your DD ready to go to 50 % .You scare than you deposit $10 k and now lower DD to 25% .But for followers they dont have extra money to deposit so their account would be 50% DD , than at one point your account DD to 40% than followers account blow up .
The only reason to deposit more fund overtime is make DD lower .
Well any way that is the past .Hope he would not deposit fund now more and focus on trading and control DD .
Good luck to all .
तबसे मेंबर है Dec 12, 2011
82 पोस्टों
Aug 21, 2014 at 17:14
तबसे मेंबर है Dec 12, 2011
82 पोस्टों
What strategy are employing to get out of the current 33% drawdown.
तबसे मेंबर है May 04, 2012
1534 पोस्टों
Aug 21, 2014 at 22:34
तबसे मेंबर है May 04, 2012
1534 पोस्टों
Clopma posted:
What strategy are employing to get out of the current 33% drawdown.
Another typical "Forex Fairy Tale"... The really annoying thing about it is that the "strategy manager" is SELLING his signals while not keeping his DD promise made on his Bio page:
"Trading Style: Our strategy is based on money management and pull backs. See the history and you will understand.
We a have maximum 20% risk from our balance and 20% monthly profit."
- The 33% DD is definitely more than the promised 20%, at least according to my 1st grade math teacher...
- Letting clients' accounts go into a 33% deep DD is simply CRUEL, UNPROFESSIONAL and IMMORAL.
"Right now I am part of a team of experienced traders which manage several accounts and we decided to reveal our strategy."
- "Team of experienced traders..." -- Come on! It must be a JOKE... (and not a good one).
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
तबसे मेंबर है Jan 03, 2014
218 पोस्टों
तबसे मेंबर है Dec 12, 2011
82 पोस्टों
Aug 22, 2014 at 17:28
तबसे मेंबर है Dec 12, 2011
82 पोस्टों
Yeay!!! He finally bit the bullet and closed out all trades manually. 30% in losses 😭. That was brave on his part, though. Now it is time to start from a clean slate.

forex_trader_178891
तबसे मेंबर है Feb 26, 2014
97 पोस्टों
Aug 22, 2014 at 19:47
(एडिट हो रहा है Aug 22, 2014 at 19:48)
तबसे मेंबर है Feb 26, 2014
97 पोस्टों
You guys have to be realistic .
Any system with more than 10 % return a month or more than 10% DD will be wipe out at the end . ( No exception .No one in the world ever can make more than 5% a month in long term ) .
Any thing more than 5% a month is high risk .
All the times keep DD less than 10% .That is number one rule .
1% , 2% , 5% a month is good .Any thing more than 1% a month is better than put cash in the bank .
Any system with more than 10 % return a month or more than 10% DD will be wipe out at the end . ( No exception .No one in the world ever can make more than 5% a month in long term ) .
Any thing more than 5% a month is high risk .
All the times keep DD less than 10% .That is number one rule .
1% , 2% , 5% a month is good .Any thing more than 1% a month is better than put cash in the bank .
तबसे मेंबर है Dec 12, 2011
82 पोस्टों
Aug 22, 2014 at 20:23
तबसे मेंबर है Dec 12, 2011
82 पोस्टों
vinabao posted:
You guys have to be realistic .
Any system with more than 10 % return a month or more than 10% DD will be wipe out at the end . ( No exception .No one in the world ever can make more than 5% a month in long term ) .
Any thing more than 5% a month is high risk .
All the times keep DD less than 10% .That is number one rule .
1% , 2% , 5% a month is good .Any thing more than 1% a month is better than put cash in the bank .
So what is your rational for keeping a 64% floating drawdown on your own account given the return you are showing. Being realistic means cutting one's loses before it gets too deep. I guess it is hard for all of us to follow this simple rule.
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/vinabao/slappy-bird-sp/992505
तबसे मेंबर है Dec 12, 2011
82 पोस्टों
Aug 24, 2014 at 22:24
तबसे मेंबर है Dec 12, 2011
82 पोस्टों
Clopma posted:vinabao posted:
You guys have to be realistic .
Any system with more than 10 % return a month or more than 10% DD will be wipe out at the end . ( No exception .No one in the world ever can make more than 5% a month in long term ) .
Any thing more than 5% a month is high risk .
All the times keep DD less than 10% .That is number one rule .
1% , 2% , 5% a month is good .Any thing more than 1% a month is better than put cash in the bank .
So what is your rational for keeping a 64% floating drawdown on your own account given the return you are showing. Being realistic means cutting one's loses before it gets too deep. I guess it is hard for all of us to follow this simple rule.
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/vinabao/slappy-bird-sp/992505
And soon after this post,the system is made private. The irony of systems showcased on Myfxbook.😉😉😉
तबसे मेंबर है May 04, 2012
1534 पोस्टों
Aug 25, 2014 at 05:08
तबसे मेंबर है May 04, 2012
1534 पोस्टों
REAL Pro traders have better things to do than showing off on MyFxBook, and with their accumulated wealth they could not care less about recruiting signal subscribers for $69.99 per month...
So it is a waste of time to look for "Pro money managers" and system developers here on MyFxBook. Also, it is foolishness to take signals from anybody who is already not rich from his trading. But if he were rich already, then he would not be selling his signals on MyFxBook. Catch22...
So it is a waste of time to look for "Pro money managers" and system developers here on MyFxBook. Also, it is foolishness to take signals from anybody who is already not rich from his trading. But if he were rich already, then he would not be selling his signals on MyFxBook. Catch22...
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
तबसे मेंबर है May 04, 2012
1534 पोस्टों
Sep 07, 2014 at 21:36
तबसे मेंबर है May 04, 2012
1534 पोस्टों
Another epic crash... As predicted.
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
तबसे मेंबर है Oct 31, 2013
89 पोस्टों
Sep 08, 2014 at 09:26
तबसे मेंबर है Oct 31, 2013
89 पोस्टों
RIP pureprofit opps sorry pureloss😁
A trader can be an economist but an economist could never be a trader. They are too theoretical.
तबसे मेंबर है May 04, 2012
1534 पोस्टों
Sep 08, 2014 at 09:58
तबसे मेंबर है May 04, 2012
1534 पोस्टों
"The user has deleted this system."
And all the subscribers on SimpleTrader.net are now officially "f...ed". Typical... Gabriel (the "Pro") and his "prp team" could compensate their losses from the subscription fees collected, but his clients got the "double whammy".
I think we shall see Gabriel and his Romanian "pro team" soon with another "fantastic" strategy and under a different name... According to their "bio" they left an investment bank 4 years ago. Now it is clear why...
THE CONCLUSION: As this example shows 99% of the "for fee" Forex strategies on the net are desperate attempts by inapt traders to make some money - from subscription fees. Anyone who is profitable does not need the $69.99/month subscription fees and the hassle which comes with it.
And all the subscribers on SimpleTrader.net are now officially "f...ed". Typical... Gabriel (the "Pro") and his "prp team" could compensate their losses from the subscription fees collected, but his clients got the "double whammy".
I think we shall see Gabriel and his Romanian "pro team" soon with another "fantastic" strategy and under a different name... According to their "bio" they left an investment bank 4 years ago. Now it is clear why...
THE CONCLUSION: As this example shows 99% of the "for fee" Forex strategies on the net are desperate attempts by inapt traders to make some money - from subscription fees. Anyone who is profitable does not need the $69.99/month subscription fees and the hassle which comes with it.
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)

forex_trader_136673
तबसे मेंबर है Jun 28, 2013
842 पोस्टों
Sep 08, 2014 at 19:30
तबसे मेंबर है Jun 28, 2013
842 पोस्टों
Basically it got kicked by a Scotish poll. Very unique.
तबसे मेंबर है Oct 31, 2013
89 पोस्टों
Sep 09, 2014 at 06:06
तबसे मेंबर है Oct 31, 2013
89 पोस्टों
you cant blame Scotish poll. you have to get out from the market anyhow
ahuruglica posted:
Basically it got kicked by a Scotish poll. Very unique.
A trader can be an economist but an economist could never be a trader. They are too theoretical.

forex_trader_136673
तबसे मेंबर है Jun 28, 2013
842 पोस्टों
तबसे मेंबर है Oct 31, 2013
89 पोस्टों
Sep 09, 2014 at 06:19
तबसे मेंबर है Oct 31, 2013
89 पोस्टों
this is not a joke its true that it got kicked out by a Scotish referendum poll
A trader can be an economist but an economist could never be a trader. They are too theoretical.
तबसे मेंबर है Jun 27, 2014
4 पोस्टों

*व्यवसायिक इस्तेमाल और स्पैम को ब्रदाश नहीं किया जाएगा, और इसका परिणाम खाता को बन्द करना भी हो सकता है.
टिप: किसी चित्र या यूट्यूब या URL को पोस्ट करने से वे अपने आप आपके पोस्ट में आजाएगा!
टिप: @ चिन्ह को टाइप करें उपभोगता के नाम को अपने आप करने के लिए जो इस चर्चा में भाग ले रहा है.