To use chat, please login.
Back to contacts

VCC MT4-2 (By Cuong )

The user has made his strategy private.

VCC MT4-2 Discussion

JForex78 (JForex78)
Aug 29 2019 at 21:18
56 posts
Hi,

Have you forgotten to close the 3 AUDUSD Buy Trades on Aug 13?

They are drawing down the system to 25%. And we had multiple opportunities to close them at $0.

Will you pls look into them?

Thank you.

Cuong (CuongVC)
Oct 21 2019 at 18:53
237 posts
No JForex78, I do not forget them.

If you can prove that you can make money grows, tons of money will flow to you.
JForex78 (JForex78)
Oct 22 2019 at 16:15
56 posts
That was from 2 months ago... but thanks.

Cuong (CuongVC)
Oct 23 2019 at 01:16
237 posts
DD value in here is not the true DD. Currently is just based on Equity%. That is (Equity/Balance)%. DD= 100%- Equity%. That is DD= (Balance-Equity)/Balance. That is not truly DD per definition.

The DD should purely based on Equity. It should be like this: True DD= (EquityPeak- Equity)/PeakEquity.

The DD calculated here leads to higher DD value when your balance grow even though the Equity stay unchanged.

Example:
  At time 0:
      Balance= 1000; Equity= 1000;
  At time 1:
      Balance= 1000; Equity= 900; EquityPeak= the highest equity in the past= 1000; DD= (1000-900)/1000= 10%; TrueDD= (1000-900)/1000= 10%
  At time 2:
      Balance= 1100; Equity= 900; EquityPeak= the highest equity in the past= 1000; DD= (1100-900)/1100= 18.18%; TrueDD= (1000-900)/1000= 10%

The 18.18% above is not right. The equity still stay the same compared to it at time 1 so the drawdown should stay the same at 10%.



If you can prove that you can make money grows, tons of money will flow to you.
Cuong (CuongVC)
Oct 23 2019 at 07:08
237 posts
JForex78 posted:
That was from 2 months ago... but thanks.

I replied to you long ago in private message.

If you can prove that you can make money grows, tons of money will flow to you.
JOHN LARTEY (CASHLOVE)
Oct 24 2019 at 10:47
5 posts
PLEASE GREETINGS,
Please my name is John and have been so happy to have gotten in torch with you guys please i have read everything about the robot and in fact you have an amazing EA which the world has to embrace it.

(Please normally reading descriptions on you tube on EA looks very interesting but after you buy the robot you will even regret that you bought it.. I have bought soo many robot which i ended up loosing my money all because when you ask owners to of tell you how to set for the deposit amount... in fact they wont mine you. Please i hope this robot will be my last stop of buying a robot.)

PLEASE ARE YOU ON WHATSAPP WHICH I CAN CONTACT YOU DIRECTLY

PLEASE HOPE TO HEAR FROM YOU SOON.

splitecashtradeforex@
Cuong (CuongVC)
Oct 24 2019 at 13:11
237 posts
CASHLOVE,
 if you click my name you can see my profile. The contact information is listed there.

Regards

If you can prove that you can make money grows, tons of money will flow to you.
JForex78 (JForex78)
Oct 24 2019 at 15:22
56 posts
CuongVC posted:
DD value in here is not the true DD. Currently is just based on Equity%. That is (Equity/Balance)%. DD= 100%- Equity%. That is DD= (Balance-Equity)/Balance. That is not truly DD per definition.

The DD should purely based on Equity. It should be like this: True DD= (EquityPeak- Equity)/PeakEquity.

The DD calculated here leads to higher DD value when your balance grow even though the Equity stay unchanged.

Example:
  At time 0:
      Balance= 1000; Equity= 1000;
  At time 1:
      Balance= 1000; Equity= 900; EquityPeak= the highest equity in the past= 1000; DD= (1000-900)/1000= 10%; TrueDD= (1000-900)/1000= 10%
  At time 2:
      Balance= 1100; Equity= 900; EquityPeak= the highest equity in the past= 1000; DD= (1100-900)/1100= 18.18%; TrueDD= (1000-900)/1000= 10%

The 18.18% above is not right. The equity still stay the same compared to it at time 1 so the drawdown should stay the same at 10%.




@CuongVC

Thats a good argument.

But remember,
DD= (Balance-Equity)/Balance

Is the classic formula. Because DD is really trying to measure 'the gap' between the current balance, and current equity.

Even though your balance increases, and equity remains same - the gap has increased. Thats what the 18.18% is trying to report.

What its saying is, that equity has not caught up with increased balance yet.


Cuong (CuongVC)
Oct 25 2019 at 09:38
237 posts
Balance increase faster than equity, in this period. That is totally fine with me because the key is the equity. Your account is worth at your equity value.

So, try to focus on the equity number, not the balance. The gap between balance and equity is just unrealized loss which will fluctuate and become will smaller when the price pull back which it always do.

If you can prove that you can make money grows, tons of money will flow to you.
JForex78 (JForex78)
Oct 28 2019 at 03:50
56 posts
CuongVC posted:
 the key is the equity. Your account is worth at your equity value.


Correct. But DD has got nothing to do with which is more important between Balance and Equity.

The classic DD formula measures the gap between Balance and Equity, at the same time on Time axis.

If you are going to measure the difference between Equity and Equity itself, one Peak and one Current, now you cannot have the same time on time axis. You have to pick them from two separate times - one somewhere in the past, and one current. Which is a flaw.

This is why MyFXBook, SignalStart, MQL5, all of them define and calculate DD as difference between Balance and Equity, at a given time.

They are not going to change that if someone thinks it should be a difference between Peak and Current Equities - try asking them to change it!

Please login to comment .