Edit Your Comment
Don't kid with leverage..
Jul 27, 2014 at 19:02
會員從Apr 19, 2014開始
15帖子
Leverage factor can be eliminated when one can define their trading risk percentage and define the pips they can lose in a trade.
This way it doesn't matter whether the leverage is 1:50 or 1:500, the lose is limited to the percentage of the account size.
Calculator http://www.alpari.com/research-tools/calculators
This way it doesn't matter whether the leverage is 1:50 or 1:500, the lose is limited to the percentage of the account size.
Calculator http://www.alpari.com/research-tools/calculators
There is nothing lost or wasted in this life
Jul 27, 2014 at 21:46
會員從Feb 22, 2011開始
4573帖子
forexwiz posted:
Leverage factor can be eliminated when one can define their trading risk percentage and define the pips they can lose in a trade.
This way it doesn't matter whether the leverage is 1:50 or 1:500, the lose is limited to the percentage of the account size.
Calculator http://www.alpari.com/research-tools/calculators
Not exactly with the low leverage the loss is determined by margin call
會員從Jun 09, 2014開始
134帖子
會員從Feb 10, 2013開始
6帖子
會員從Mar 19, 2014開始
2帖子
Aug 02, 2014 at 14:32
會員從Mar 19, 2014開始
2帖子
I've always felt that newer folks fall under the spell of being provided 500:1 leverage and thinking they need to use it all simply because "it's there".
My trading really turned around when I realized that leveraging yourself out over 10:1 for the majority of the times you interact with the market is difficult to manage in the long run (in terms of managing risk and capital exposure over time).
Jake
My trading really turned around when I realized that leveraging yourself out over 10:1 for the majority of the times you interact with the market is difficult to manage in the long run (in terms of managing risk and capital exposure over time).
Jake

forex_trader_43716
會員從Aug 06, 2011開始
326帖子
Aug 02, 2014 at 21:20
會員從Aug 06, 2011開始
326帖子
FOREXunlimited posted:
I've always felt that newer folks fall under the spell of being provided 500:1 leverage and thinking they need to use it all simply because "it's there".
My trading really turned around when I realized that leveraging yourself out over 10:1 for the majority of the times you interact with the market is difficult to manage in the long run (in terms of managing risk and capital exposure over time).
Jake
Agree! Leverage is like the bank overdraft a business uses to manage cashflow...just because it's there, doesn't mean you to have to use all of it, all the time. 😎
Aug 03, 2014 at 09:53
會員從Nov 29, 2013開始
95帖子
prachait posted:
I emptied by account with 2000:1 , 3 times in last 5 months
Now, i am happy with 50:1 and it is doing great for me |
Prachait
wow 3 times... you should have learned the lesson when its happened at first time.
i believe that was not leverage's fault. you just need to learn MM / risk
leverage really doesn't matter.
50:1 doing great of course... even you get stop outed you still have balance left. but whats the point? it means your system is not working already. why you care 2000:1 or 50:1
50:1 really sucks. it limits strategies and required high capital to start.
low leverage only for people who don't know how to SL trades ,lets let broker stop for you.
there is no tell low leverage = safer , it makes no sense.
Aug 04, 2014 at 06:43
會員從Apr 19, 2014開始
15帖子
kanon103 posted:prachait posted:
I emptied by account with 2000:1 , 3 times in last 5 months
Now, i am happy with 50:1 and it is doing great for me |
Prachait
wow 3 times... you should have learned the lesson when its happened at first time.
i believe that was not leverage's fault. you just need to learn MM / risk
leverage really doesn't matter.
50:1 doing great of course... even you get stop outed you still have balance left. but whats the point? it means your system is not working already. why you care 2000:1 or 50:1
50:1 really sucks. it limits strategies and required high capital to start.
low leverage only for people who don't know how to SL trades ,lets let broker stop for you.
there is no tell low leverage = safer , it makes no sense.
The guy is just being honest about his trading and is nothing to be embarrassed about past failings. The key is to learn from our mistakes and become better trader similar to a toddler who has to fall many times before learning to walk.
There is nothing lost or wasted in this life

forex_trader_75987
會員從May 02, 2012開始
113帖子
Aug 04, 2014 at 12:56
會員從May 02, 2012開始
113帖子
prachait posted:
I emptied by account with 2000:1 , 3 times in last 5 months
Now, i am happy with 50:1 and it is doing great for me |
Prachait
@prachait CONTRAGUTALION ! use small leverage brings profitable returns. I also had experienced about. For example, using a leverage 500:1 i blow up my account. But if i use a leverege of 100:1 my account doubles up.
In a way, leverage is not the real demon , the problem is learn Money management.
Aug 04, 2014 at 19:18
會員從Jul 22, 2014開始
37帖子
@Igor123472 Thanks | and with 50:1 I have given the Money Management to the server | 😇 😀
Now, I do the Analysis and place the pending orders with Currency Movement, News, Correlation etc .
Once the time hit the number, the order will auto get place and get completed too |
1% daily is the minimum I am earning now with manual trading |
Looking forward to double the account now |
Thanks Prachait
Now, I do the Analysis and place the pending orders with Currency Movement, News, Correlation etc .
Once the time hit the number, the order will auto get place and get completed too |
1% daily is the minimum I am earning now with manual trading |
Looking forward to double the account now |
Thanks Prachait
Forex - Currency Trading is for Living |

*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。