Reitings: Full Star Full Star Full Star Full Star Full Star
Humans vs. Robots
Iepriekšējās 1 2 3 4 5 6 Nākamais

Biedrs kopš Nov 01, 2013  31 ieraksti MoneyCode Dec 06 2013 at 08:03
ahuruglica posted:
Thalantas posted:

The truth is that not only the human behavior and price action, but the universe and everything in it is made of the same pattern and sequences. No matter if 99% of volume is traded between computers, there will be 1% of humans trading and computers will hunt them. Also every human decisions and economic events will occur with the same pattern. So no fear....

Exactly. Unlimited variance and evolution exist in the market, just as in nature. View the recent dominance of automated volume in the market, as a perfect example of evolution of price behavior. This evolution makes old systems fail. Adaptive solutions whether manual or automated are the only answer.


Biedrs kopš Feb 07, 2011  724 ieraksti PipGnostic (TheCyclist) Dec 06 2013 at 13:05 (labots Dec 06 2013 at 13:17 )

Why can't you use multiple pairs in auto trading ? I run arrays of pairs, you can do very high volumes of work across many pairs. And you can do things that humans can't do. Work out the relationship between say 24 positions every 0.xxxx seconds. See if something needs to be changed and change it before you even knew the opportunity was there.

Look the problem with the EA's are that everyone tries to take a combination of hundreds of years old indicators and try and get the computer to sit and watch them. Ever now and then they fiddle the settings an viola, holy grail! Just to see it fail a few weeks later. That's because screen staring is not what computers are for or good at.

I promise you most of the advanced stuff doesn't even have GUI's. People run them in terminals for speed. Takes resources to fill a screen with lines. The fact is, the HFT guys, arguable the most successful traders in operation today, don't even know what they're trading.

Best way to use computers is for high volumes of small but consistent profits. Just bank,bank,bank...keep the risks small. So small it's not worth your time, but the machine doesn't care.

Show me your pips!!

Biedrs kopš Jul 02, 2013  57 ieraksti Dennis O. (dgaf) Dec 06 2013 at 14:02
Robots follow rules & trade with no emotions.

Sleep is for the weak

Biedrs kopš Apr 21, 2013  101 ieraksti forex alert system (forexalertsystem) Dec 08 2013 at 08:04
Depends on how good the EA programmer is: below is a mature trading system. i recorded 2 days worth and compressed it into a short time lapse video. you will see it make a lot of live trades and make a decent amount of money in a short amount of time trading many pairs. simultaneously. this video below is a HFT system



Biedrs kopš Jun 28, 2013  852 ieraksti ArdiFX (ahuruglica) Dec 08 2013 at 21:52

No offense man but this is considered spam.


Biedrs kopš Jul 02, 2013  57 ieraksti Dennis O. (dgaf) Dec 09 2013 at 07:26
@forexalertsystem Where are the rest of the results and how is your signal services tested and guaranteed is there any proof?

what is forex/trading these sites look fake.

Sleep is for the weak

Biedrs kopš Nov 20, 2013  7 ieraksti forexci Dec 09 2013 at 12:11
The way I see it is that those who follow price action, whether it be following chart patterns (support/resistance, trendlines, fibs, candlesticks) or using their naked eye, prefer the subjective/interpretive element of trading.

Whereas those who follow indicators like the rule-bound element of it. A case can be made for each I suppose, and pitfalls are plenty with each method.

There is the complaint of how indicators lag - yet there are plenty of attempts to make indicators lag a whole lot less, though these attempts tend to add more noise in the picture. However, because it is easier to follow rules with indicators, they can be planted into an EA and quantifiably backtested. That is a big plus!

I Think, Therefore I'm Guessing

Biedrs kopš Jun 28, 2013  852 ieraksti ArdiFX (ahuruglica) Dec 10 2013 at 21:25
Interesting article on the subject from bloomberg. Worth the time reading:


Biedrs kopš Mar 29, 2012  192 ieraksti Thalantas Dec 10 2013 at 23:42
Thanks @ahuruglica for this interesting article!

It seems like the machine business is struggling to find a good system, like we do here on a much smaller scale. The holly graal is very hard to find and there's no easy money!
The most stable traders I know are manual and have usually underwent strong DD once in a while... Some system here are profitable since a little while but it is a bit depressing to think that what we call 'a while' is nothing longer than a couple years on myfxbook!
Starting from there, it is hard to think that we can build up an alternative to a retirement plan if you constantly have to find new EAs!

A smooth sea never made a skillful sailor.

Biedrs kopš Jun 28, 2013  852 ieraksti ArdiFX (ahuruglica) Dec 11 2013 at 20:33
Hey Guys

I have an robot to sell but it's not that cheap. It's price is 1,618,382.50$

Damn, it looks like a robot but it is human. I'm not allowed to sell him but everyone can learn to trade like him :)

Iepriekšējās 1 2 3 4 5 6 Nākamais
Harvest Festival (8h 11min)
The Wall Street Journal: China cancels t...(2h 7min ago)
EURUSD 1.17526 GBPUSD 1.30808
USDJPY 112.56 USDCAD 1.29172







Twitter |  Facebook |  Lapas karte  |  Noteikumi  |   Privacy Policy
©2018 Myfxbook Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
HIGH RISK WARNING: Foreign exchange trading carries a high level of risk that may not be suitable for all investors. Leverage creates additional risk and loss exposure. Before you decide to trade foreign exchange, carefully consider your investment objectives, experience level, and risk tolerance. You could lose some or all of your initial investment; do not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. Educate yourself on the risks associated with foreign exchange trading, and seek advice from an independent financial or tax advisor if you have any questions. Any data and information is provided 'as is' solely for informational purposes, and is not intended for trading purposes or advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.