sPhantom Auto Trader (由 sPhantom)
收益 : | +694.0% |
缩减 | 91.94% |
点: | 1266.4 |
交易 | 261 |
赢得: |
|
损失:。 |
|
类型: | 真实 |
杠杆率: | 1:400 |
交易: | 自动的 |
Edit Your Comment
sPhantom Auto Trader讨论
Oct 16, 2013 at 13:45
会员从May 27, 2013开始
62帖子
wingy posted:
sPhantom.
Because your system requires manual intervention for trade direction based on Economic factors.
I find it hard to understand how you did a back test for 2012?
Please clarify how you arrived at the backtest results?
Dear Wingy
There are some economic calendar news which make us avoid trading. We have did the same for the back test but of course because of human intervention the back test can't be the exact result of the EA so I recommend to study our live results instead.
Regards
会员从Sep 26, 2013开始
8帖子
会员从Jun 03, 2010开始
675帖子
Oct 28, 2013 at 09:29
会员从Oct 18, 2013开始
5帖子
Adrian: You can still reduce your risk setting or close the trade by hands. You would still have impressive return with half the risk master account is running.
I'm not associated with sP but I've been running it for a few weeks and it's amazing for now. I do however use my own money management EA on the same account. For sP I'm not changing trade size but I do have a few safety features overlooking trading.
I'm not associated with sP but I've been running it for a few weeks and it's amazing for now. I do however use my own money management EA on the same account. For sP I'm not changing trade size but I do have a few safety features overlooking trading.
会员从Sep 26, 2013开始
8帖子
Oct 28, 2013 at 11:40
会员从Oct 18, 2013开始
5帖子
I asked sPhantom the same question.
They recommended 15 risk (or up to 30 max.) for 1:400 account. I'm currently running it at 25 (having leverage reduced by broker to 1:300) but I am aware of my risk and I'm prepared to manage risk manualy if it comes to that.
That's all I know. So you're probably at a high risk for 1:500 account.
You could ask them. I guess you should at least go down to 20 or keep a close eye on the action.
They recommended 15 risk (or up to 30 max.) for 1:400 account. I'm currently running it at 25 (having leverage reduced by broker to 1:300) but I am aware of my risk and I'm prepared to manage risk manualy if it comes to that.
That's all I know. So you're probably at a high risk for 1:500 account.
You could ask them. I guess you should at least go down to 20 or keep a close eye on the action.
会员从Jun 03, 2010开始
675帖子
Oct 28, 2013 at 13:32
会员从Jun 03, 2010开始
675帖子
mrkmrk posted:
I'm not associated with sP but I've been running it for a few weeks and it's amazing for now. I do however use my own money management EA on the same account. For sP I'm not changing trade size but I do have a few safety features overlooking trading.
I know from few customers of sPhantom that it's a scam. If You wish I can upload their statements.
PAMM MANAGER // Professional Fund Manager
Oct 28, 2013 at 13:53
会员从Aug 20, 2011开始
587帖子
adrian8891 posted:
I know from few customers of sPhantom that it's a scam. If You wish I can upload their statements.
yes, if you have found comments it will be good to know this.
where do you found this info?
from forexpeacearmy there is nothing bad, same here.
Oct 28, 2013 at 14:11
会员从May 27, 2013开始
62帖子
adrian8891 posted:mrkmrk posted:
I'm not associated with sP but I've been running it for a few weeks and it's amazing for now. I do however use my own money management EA on the same account. For sP I'm not changing trade size but I do have a few safety features overlooking trading.
I know from few customers of sPhantom that it's a scam. If You wish I can upload their statements.
Dear Adrian
We are honest. We have no hidden review or statement.
We are ready to prove it. Please share what ever you have.
Regards
Oct 29, 2013 at 01:05
会员从May 27, 2013开始
62帖子
jiang posted:
sPhantom:
Why the Avg. Trade Length is 9h 46m, but ATR for 1 hour is about 7 or more than 10pips, It seems the trades are in the opposite trend.How about improve it?
HI
This doesn't mean the trades are against the trend. As you can check most of the trades are closed less than 4 hours.
Regards
会员从Sep 26, 2013开始
8帖子
Oct 29, 2013 at 11:08
会员从Sep 26, 2013开始
8帖子
mrkmrk posted:
I asked sPhantom the same question.
They recommended 15 risk (or up to 30 max.) for 1:400 account. I'm currently running it at 25 (having leverage reduced by broker to 1:300) but I am aware of my risk and I'm prepared to manage risk manualy if it comes to that.
That's all I know. So you're probably at a high risk for 1:500 account.
You could ask them. I guess you should at least go down to 20 or keep a close eye on the action.
@mrkmrk dont you think that with higher leverage the risk will decrease with the same EA settings ? I meen if you have a higher leverage such as in my case I would need less margin to open a trade with the same size and though more free margin will be available in my account so I would handle more DD without the risk of going to margin call. is that true ? what I meen here if I am using lets say 30% risk factor with 1:300 leverage it will be more risky than using the same 30% with 1:500 leverage.
会员从Sep 26, 2013开始
8帖子
Oct 29, 2013 at 11:09
会员从Sep 26, 2013开始
8帖子
adrian8891 posted:mrkmrk posted:
I'm not associated with sP but I've been running it for a few weeks and it's amazing for now. I do however use my own money management EA on the same account. For sP I'm not changing trade size but I do have a few safety features overlooking trading.
I know from few customers of sPhantom that it's a scam. If You wish I can upload their statements.
@adrian8891 can you please be more specific and exolain what you mean by scam ? is it the back test that you mean ?

*商业用途和垃圾邮件将不被容忍,并可能导致账户终止。
提示:发布图片/YouTube网址会自动嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:键入@符号,自动完成参与此讨论的用户名。