5% average monthly profit for at least 2 years (with less than 25% max. DD)

Victor
Anmaric's system makes very little profit and asks so much profit in return which makes it not worth it. Otherwise it's a nice safe system.

B1FXprof posted:
Hello mate

Glad you're still in fine spirits. What risk there is to me is that I pay out 50% of any losses made; if the system I use generates loss only, I lose. When it generates profit I and the client win.

I remain loyally yours and as ever am still just as happy to provide to anyone else the investor passwords to my own accounts as well as any other evidence you desire.

To you my cantankerous lovely, the offer is most definitely closed.

What a loser you are for pretending you lose when it loses idiot. The fact is if you say you lose when it loses could easily be simplified to why not trade you money then?
The answer is simple like the many scammers here you will only risk peoples money for a net gain at the end of the month. Now if the system blows the account like the sphantom, pipable etc etc did to everyone that traded it your guarantee is to run as fast as you can and hide. So don't tug on it fella and pretend you care. Not all people here are as stupid as you.

VictorTous posted:
Hey FxMasterGuru,

So, have you finally found a system that suits your criteria, if good risk/money management is taken into consideration?
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/togr/caesar-400-eurusd/662462

Cheers!
Víctor

Ceaser400 has had an excellent performance and it seems to be a good strategy, with the notion that it is a GRID strategy with a POTENTIAL 2000+ pips and 30+ percent DD.

It means that one needs to be ready (psychologically and financially) for a POTENTIAL large DD - which 'miraculously' has not happened yet. By reducing the original risk setting (0.01 lot/500 USD) one can easily survice occasional major GRID drawdowns and continue with the strategy.

VictorTous posted:
By the way... what do you think of?:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Anmaric_LTD

EDIT: Sorry, you have already commented on it!

I don't mind commenting again: It is also highly suspicious of potential Ponzi scheme (remember the Madoff story...). Unfortunately brokers can manipulate MyFxBook trade history, which always comes to one's mind when a 'suspiciously good' strategy is run at a non-mainstream broker with lots of question marks in its background.

I have corresponded with a few investors who have taken their monies back from Anmaric and other similarly and suspiciously successful strategies run at the same 'no name' broker. Why? For the same exact reason mentioned above.

FxMasterGuru posted:

VictorTous posted:
Hey FxMasterGuru,

So, have you finally found a system that suits your criteria, if good risk/money management is taken into consideration?
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/togr/caesar-400-eurusd/662462

Cheers!
Víctor

Ceaser400 has had an excellent performance and it seems to be a good strategy, with the notion that it is a GRID strategy with a POTENTIAL 2000+ pips and 30+ percent DD.

It means that one needs to be ready (psychologically and financially) for a POTENTIAL large DD - which 'miraculously' has not happened yet. By reducing the original risk setting (0.01 lot/500 USD) one can easily survice occasional major GRID drawdowns and continue with the strategy.

No such good strategy when the account isn't protected, so if there isn't a SL or such a strategy that protects the account in place which doesn't appear to be then it's a matter of time before a mistake is made...just look at the Sphantom and pipable...everything looks good until it blows up. But if there is a SL then it's a great system. That guy seems to be cycling and removes trades as they becomes profitable or close to profitable until the HTF takes over, then there will be disaster. Besides no big investor would take on such rubbish when each trade is unprotected.

Well, there are many shades of gray. So far it is the most stable grid I have ever seen, however, I agree: a major DD will come sooner or later. The question is only WHEN.

BUT: The SL is set at 33% with current the settings of the master account (0.01 lot/1000 USD). It means that if someone would set the risk at 0.01 lot/3000 USD margin, then the max. SL would be around 10%, while the strategy would still make about 80% per year. And an occasional 10% DD is not that bad for 70-80% profit per year.

Even with 4 major (i.e. 10%) drawdowns per year, probably it can still make about 30-40% year.

We shall see.

Stay away from any system that doesn't show a broker. is not Track Record Verified and where trading privileges are not displayed. They can manipulate trades.

Yes, I agree. Nevertheless, in this specific case many real subscribers - with published accounts - are getting identical results with mainstream brokers.

Exactly, like this:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/togr/caesar2icma/737724

And the vendor himself is also trading another less risky version of his 'Caesar' system, finally in a verified account with a reputable broker:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/togr/fxprimusc21/756902

5% average monthly profit for at least 2 years with less than 25% max. DD...?

A relatively new one worth watching:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/autotrade/johnpaul77/786533

Not 2 years, but IMPRESSIVE stats so far:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/fxtrading4living/mla-investment-ltd-mam-managed/742015

@VictorTous

Thanks, Victor! The first one looks pretty good, actually the only stable strategy fullfilling the criteria.

Concerning the second one I have an issue with the choice of broker, which I have already voiced for Milan, but I will copy it here:

There are multiple Hungarian blog entries stating that 3TGFX is a Hungarian owned and operated business (registered in the very slightly regulated country of New Zealand) potentially running multiple Ponzi schemes (i.e. they may 'fix' the results of strategies run by numerous and suspiciously 'successful' teams through them). For the same exact reason - in spite of the stable results - investors are running away even from their most profitable strategies...

You can read about it even on DONNAFOREX: https://www.donnaforex.com/forum/index.php?topic=11500.0

Of course, no hard evidence as of yet. I also used to have an account with 3TGFX (subscribing to one of the teams' strategies run by them) and there were no technical issues, 'except' for the occasional 'picture perfect' trades at the best possible entry and exit prices with absolutely no slippages (when looking at the trade reports and the chart formations). Which was just too suspicious considering the number of clients and volume they trade for their affiliated Multi-Level-Marketed team' strategies.

But remember Madoff...! You know, the guy who has pulled off the largest ever Ponzi scheme (https://money.howstuffworks.com/ponzi-scheme5.htm). How many people have complained about him or his investment performance BEFORE the 'sh.t hit the fan'...? Exactly: NOBODY! Everybody was just a 'happy camper'.

And just a few words about New Zealand's Fx regulations. It is called the 'Wild West' of Forex... Why? Read this article: https://www.forextraders.com/forex-broker-new-zealand.html

In other words NZ would be just the 'perfect' country to pull off a giant Ponzi scheme.

My DD is 26% so a little more but take a look anyways.

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/gappo123/gap-growth/881994

You may also wish to take a look to the PowerFlow system. It's a grid trading system which runs since 2013 forward and delivers great results.

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Forex21/powerflow-ea-3rd-acc-wwwforex21com/985198
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Forex21/powerflow-ea-2nd-acc-wwwforex21com/990323

Almost 5% monthly, almost 2 years track record, worth to watch.
Performance of DMAM of Fx21 named ST1: https://www.myfxbook.com/members/fx21mam/fx21-dmam/752854
Performance on my account: https://www.myfxbook.com/members/fx21krisz/my-fx21-dmam-1239174dcfx/1056244
My blog: https://fx21managedaccounts.wordpress.com/

gappo123 posted:
My DD is 26% so a little more but take a look anyways.

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/gappo123/gap-growth/881994

-36% max DD... -12% floating DD...

For 'hobby trading' these numbers are 'OK', but for serious funds, any DD beyond -10% is simply too risky.

fx21krisz posted:
Almost 5% monthly, almost 2 years track record, worth to watch.
Performance of DMAM of Fx21 named ST1: https://www.myfxbook.com/members/fx21mam/fx21-dmam/752854
Performance on my account: https://www.myfxbook.com/members/fx21krisz/my-fx21-dmam-1239174dcfx/1056244
My blog: https://fx21managedaccounts.wordpress.com/

The mentioned strategy and showcase account (i.e. BOTH) are under the supervision of a small Seychelle Islands registered (i.e. off-shore ==> i.e. loosley regulated) broker: DCFx.

I don't say that it is a problem, but brokers CAN change (and create) 'verified' trades. Especially in countries with loose regulations.

So whenever I hear that the Management of a strategy and the Broker are 'under the same roof' - and especially if that 'roof' were in the Seychelle Islands - well, a few questions come up about the 'authenticity' of those 'verified' results. Another question: Why not running the strategy also at an INDEPENDENT 'mainstream' Aussie or European (EU) broker which would eliminate even the slightest suspicion of fabricated results...?

Again, I am not saying that the results are 'created', however, excluding it would be just 'due-diligence' before sending funds to a trading account registered in the Seychelle Islands... As even Bernie Madoff could make some nice statements for many years before the pyramid had collapsed on him...

Paracelsus66 posted:

I am not saying that the results are 'created', however, excluding it would be just 'due-diligence' before sending funds to a trading account registered in the Seychelle Islands... As even Bernie Madoff could make some nice statements for many years before the pyramid had collapsed on him...

Hey Paracelsus66, thanks for the reply. I know the owners personally, i meet them every week since i joind. But of coures they can lie, and it can still be a scam, but I dont think it is. They have just opened their new brokerage firm Best Choice FBC Inc. with a licence from Cyprus, and this brokerage company will offer the same DMAM service. I am from Hungary, and i could find their licence on the website of the Hungarian National Bank, before i invested. https://felugyelet.mnb.hu/bal_menu/piaci_szereplok/kereso/kereses?ktasearch_value=&ktasearch_label=&ktasearch_prev_value=&pmod=simpleSearch&n=Best+Choice+FBC+Limited&st=0&i=&a=1&x=15&y=12

Paracelsus66 posted:

gappo123 posted:
My DD is 26% so a little more but take a look anyways.

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/gappo123/gap-growth/881994

-36% max DD... -12% floating DD...

For 'hobby trading' these numbers are 'OK', but for serious funds, any DD beyond -10% is simply too risky.

Yeah since that post I made a risky trade which increased my DD. But anyways, I consider myself a hobbyist :D, due to my acc size. Its obvious that the more money you manage the more conservative you are.