To use chat, please login.
Back to contacts

Signal Start Review Scores

Overall score: 3.7 / 5

Total votes: 902
Customer service
1 - worst 5 - best

Signal Start Discussion

May 03 2017 at 10:30
34 posts

Which good signals are you copying right now ? Please even us want to make money with Signal Start.

If you're real subscribers and not some Signal Start's guy who has nothing better to do than come to this community and write these poor, too poor, comments.

May 04 2017 at 14:43
23 posts
Very good service. I'm satisfied. Thank you.

Brendan777 (Brendan777)
May 05 2017 at 06:28
101 posts
Jeanluc is bad mouthing Signal Start but also begging for someone to give him a good signal, what a joker.

Do your own research boy, there are rewards for putting in some hard work.

May 05 2017 at 06:34
34 posts
@Brendan777 when will you share with us your precious results of your own reserach? In my opinion you are only a troll paid by Signal Start with your useless bla bla bla... No one good signal from you....uhm...

I have made my own research and I can assure you that there is not one really good signal in Signal Start at the moment.

But if someone is interested I can share with you which good signals I found in AutoTrade.

Facts and not only words dear @Brendan777

Please continue your good work for Signal Start!

May 05 2017 at 06:48
34 posts
And @Brendan777 if you have really made your own reasearch and you have really found some good signals, please share their names with us, because this is the objective of a community: share usefull information (with names and not only criterias) with others members.

I'm criticizing Signal Start because I think it is the best copy trading platform for technology issues but it has not good signals at the moment. So, I'm asking in this 'community' if someone that has posted a good comment on Signal Start has maybe even found some good signals. In my opinion there are not good signals at Signal Start at the moment and the fact that nobody has posted yet the names of some good signals...confirms 100% my opinion.

@Brendan777 If you don't want to share your results (signals' names) with this community, don't come here...go fishing!


May 05 2017 at 07:35
32 posts
May 07 2017 at 06:19
1 posts
You guys are really professionals in what you are doing here. Thanks to you, I can, after some adjustments on my side, now enjoy to trade with profit!

May 07 2017 at 06:33
1 posts
Brendan777 (Brendan777)
May 07 2017 at 06:33
101 posts
Jeanluc, if you don't like it and don't think there are good signals, please feel free not to use it. You have no inputs or suggestions to make other than that Signal Start sucks, it looks very much like you're the one trolling here. I guess that also meant all the other uses who have had positive experience are wrong. Yes, I guess the special then, a genius who can't find a good signal when everyone else can...

Keep begging for good signals, it will continue to show everyone how lazy you are. Maybe if you get down on your knees long enough, someone will throw you a crumb someday.

May 07 2017 at 07:04
3 posts
Ok, I already gave a brief opinion when they asked for it, but I did some more thinking.

First of all, I've been doing Forex with moderate success for about 5 years. I'm absolutely not an expert and not a professional, but I went through a lot of research, learning and I think I have a fair understanding of how the Forex market works.

I looked at trade copying for a way to complement my Forex earnings, not to replace them and Signal Start seemed good to me at first.

That being said, investors must understand one thing: trade copying is not a way of making easy money if you are completely new to Forex. Neither on Signal Start nor anywhere else. You must know how everything works, the terms, and what to look for in a signal. You must fully understand what your are doing, otherwise you will surely lose money because you were so excited by huge number.

On Signal Start things are very strange indeed. Much has been said in this thread about the rating system on the site, and how much those signals smell iffy. Does anyone believe that a trader can make more than 7800% in just over one month? Or 22 MILLION % in 2 years? This guy must be a multi-millionaire by now, so why does he need a couple of dozen people paying him USD75 a month?

Why isn't' this ranking manually verified? Why is there is no obligation for signal providers to have a verified MyFxbook page for their signals (not even considering that those could be also faked)?

Has anyone noticed that most signals have a monthly performance chart like the one above? Super gains in the beginning (to attract new subscribers) and then abysmal performance. By then he already made good money from the subscribers and he can start a new one (maybe with a new Profile?) and do it all over again. Lather, rinse, repeat.

So, either Signal Start are being omissive by not doing anything or they are turning a blind eye for the great money flow that comes from innocent investors paying the monthly fees and the cut they get from the signal providers. Either way, this is very serious.

One other thing, and this is extremely important in any form of Forex trading, including signal copying: NEVER enter a trade with NO STOP LOSS! Sure, without a stop loss you have more time for everything to recover if things go south, but at the same time you can lose all your profit or even blow your account in a matter of minutes. Remember a few days ago when Theresa May suddenly called for a new election? That wasn’t even a planned speech. If you were on the wrong side of the trade without a stop loss, there go both your 'easily' and hard earned money!

Only a few providers state on their signal descriptions that they always put on a stop loss, but in reality not always. Check their history to see if what they say is true.

Maybe a way to communicate with the signal providers would solve that? Asking them why they are behaving the way they are and looking at the answers would be of great help in selecting one.

And it’s also very expensive. Investors with small accounts (around USD1000) are not likely to recover what they pay every month, at least not without increasing their risk significantly. Other systems charge only for the signals, not a subscription fee on the account. Some of them only charge the signal providers a cut of their profit, which is a great way to encourage the signal providers to put a real effort. Why should they now, if it’s so easy to make money.

All that being said, I’m not saying all signal providers are evil scammers. There could be some genuinely well intentioned providers here, but they are as human as us, and they can fail from time to time. Again, an extremely successful trader would never have the need for a few hundred dollars every month, but someone with a modest gain could profit modestly from that, to help pay the bills or to get that new car. If both the trader and the investor make a couple hundred (or even thousand) dollars every month, that sounds reasonable to me. Don’t expect you will ever become rich with this.

I also agree, as mentioned by numerous others, that support is terrible, slow and sometimes messages are not even replied.

And it’s also very expensive. Some people with small accounts (around USD1000) are not likely to even recover what they pay every month. Other systems charge only

A few more red flags about the service in general: No company name, no phone contact, no physical address anywhere on the site. Where is this company located? When my credit card gets charged, it comes from Cyprus. Is it registered there or is it just their bank account? Is it regulated? Is there an official government agency you can complain to if things go wrong?

So, I’m giving up on them, and probably on signal copying itself. I cannot remotely recommend this service for now. That could change if they become more transparent and listen to their customers.


Please login to comment .