Advertisement
REV Trader PRO REAL (Genom revtraderpro )
| Förstärkning : | +3474.7% |
| Uttag | 24.25% |
| Pips: | 3809.5 |
| Trades | 938 |
| Won: |
|
| Förlorad: |
|
| Typ: | Verkligt |
| Hävstångseffekt: | 1:400 |
| Handel: | Automatiserad |
REV Trader PRO REAL Diskussion
forex_trader_149646
Medlem sedan Sep 09, 2013
406 inlägg
Oct 19, 2014 at 14:09
using the logic above, I coded this EA using the info from this thread. Looks stable, I'll continue!
Oct 20, 2014 at 07:02
Hi Ozzie Matt, back testing is extremely slow which I assume is due a number of indicators working at once. I only had the patience to test AUD/USD over Sept/til 17th October 2014. Very small window I know but back testing appeared to matched live results. It looks to be a relative tidy and exciting EA. I just had to jump in an try it. I'm impressed how the EA seems to control the SL levels too. It seems to monitor the trend and will close trades if it is going against the direction.well...short of the SL. It modifies the original SL accordingly to limit the losses.
Sounds like I'm promoting the EA....sorry if it sounds that way :) I am very pleased with what I have seen so far and looks quite polished. Can't wait to see how it preforms on live test.
Sounds like I'm promoting the EA....sorry if it sounds that way :) I am very pleased with what I have seen so far and looks quite polished. Can't wait to see how it preforms on live test.
forex_trader_149646
Medlem sedan Sep 09, 2013
406 inlägg
Oct 20, 2014 at 07:18
My BT was from jan til now on GU H4 data using Bars only. Any further back and the BT is not profitable but more so breakeven at best.
The exit logic was based on RR, and preset TP, I was using about 50 pips for the TP while using Equity 1% gain to close the trades within a basket with a max loss of 1%. Therefore RR was 1:1. Now after looking at more of these trades, I can see that it does have a closing logic which I can add to close stragglers.
My first step is always entry logic, then I can use other methods to improve the strategy once a stable RR is found.
The exit logic was based on RR, and preset TP, I was using about 50 pips for the TP while using Equity 1% gain to close the trades within a basket with a max loss of 1%. Therefore RR was 1:1. Now after looking at more of these trades, I can see that it does have a closing logic which I can add to close stragglers.
My first step is always entry logic, then I can use other methods to improve the strategy once a stable RR is found.
forex_trader_149646
Medlem sedan Sep 09, 2013
406 inlägg
Oct 20, 2014 at 07:24
gwindy posted:
Hi Ozzie Matt, back testing is extremely slow which I assume is due a number of indicators working at once. I only had the patience to test AUD/USD over Sept/til 17th October 2014. Very small window I know but back testing appeared to matched live results. It looks to be a relative tidy and exciting EA. I just had to jump in an try it. I'm impressed how the EA seems to control the SL levels too. It seems to monitor the trend and will close trades if it is going against the direction.well...short of the SL. It modifies the original SL accordingly to limit the losses.
Sounds like I'm promoting the EA....sorry if it sounds that way :) I am very pleased with what I have seen so far and looks quite polished. Can't wait to see how it preforms on live test.
Please keep posting as much info about the trade management as possible. Thank you
forex_trader_149646
Medlem sedan Sep 09, 2013
406 inlägg
Oct 20, 2014 at 07:37
@gwindy - can you upload your backtest to myfxbook?
forex_trader_149646
Medlem sedan Sep 09, 2013
406 inlägg
Oct 20, 2014 at 07:49
The bot now using a different magic number of 4668 and the entry logic is slightly different than the original ( I noticed in oct 13 on AUDUSD). my comments of this strategy are posted on my website under Social signals "Rev Trader Strategy"
Medlem sedan Dec 04, 2010
1447 inlägg
Oct 21, 2014 at 00:34
The entries and exits are no longer necessarily on the hour since Oct 13, so the trading logic has been changed. Maybe the vendor can advise if the EA has been updated?
Medlem sedan Oct 11, 2014
106 inlägg
Oct 21, 2014 at 07:00
We are on version 2.3
Medlem sedan Mar 31, 2014
192 inlägg
Oct 22, 2014 at 06:40
How much this EA cost and what pairs is it trading with?
Thanks
Thanks
ben@
Medlem sedan Sep 29, 2012
416 inlägg
Oct 23, 2014 at 03:38
open trades are not shown. It may be another grid trading with martingale.The vendor is not honest
There will always some good opportunities , just don't give up
Medlem sedan Dec 04, 2010
1447 inlägg
Oct 23, 2014 at 03:44
There aren't any open trades to display currently. The balance equals the equity, hence there is no open trades. Open orders are closed (but these could be pending orders - and would not be fair to show these as anyone could then copy the pending trades, without buying the EA). I am also interested to see backtests though.
Medlem sedan Sep 29, 2012
416 inlägg
Oct 23, 2014 at 04:36
Hi Ozzie
I think no one will waste time to copy trade by trade of the pending trades :-). They would rather buy the EA outright to save time.
I think no one will waste time to copy trade by trade of the pending trades :-). They would rather buy the EA outright to save time.
There will always some good opportunities , just don't give up
Medlem sedan Dec 04, 2010
1447 inlägg
Oct 23, 2014 at 05:24
if he was hiding open trades I would agree with you, but he isn't there are just no open trades currently. I know other unscrupulous vendors hide open trades with large drawdowns etc. But I don't think that's happening here.
Medlem sedan Sep 14, 2014
8 inlägg
Oct 23, 2014 at 07:14
Has anyone bought it so far?
Medlem sedan Nov 04, 2013
6 inlägg
Oct 23, 2014 at 07:15
seems the EA very interesting....selling $697 from their site.
anyone try on real account?
anyone try on real account?
Medlem sedan Sep 14, 2014
8 inlägg
Oct 23, 2014 at 14:20
gwindy what are your results so far? In pips
Medlem sedan Jun 29, 2014
2 inlägg
Oct 24, 2014 at 08:01
gwindy please tell us the results of this EA, to understand better if this EA is really good or not :)
