We need to have a real trading contest that matches wits of people. Any one can buy a bot and load it. There really should be 3 different contests REAL traders, Programmers, and Gamblers (who have the money to buy bots in the first place). Just a thought for those out there who dont know how to trade for real.
You will never go broke by taking profits
May 11 2010 at 03:23
we already have something like that - SYSTEMS page
May 21 2010 at 15:24
Yeah, I agree. This 'contest' brings every constructive discussion about real good, consistent systems to an halt.. all are staring at some crazy risk taking competitors hoping to get a quick and deep insight how to get rich in no time LOL
May 25 2010 at 13:00
So what do you think should be the starting balance for a real contest? I think $1,000 should do it. 😄
I wonder what would be the prizes then.
I wonder what would be the prizes then.
May 25 2010 at 13:35
wilkinson posted:
I wonder what would be the prizes then.
Prize would be to not to lose own $1000 :) , but I agree REAL contest would be more realistic with same broker and probably I would limit to some major pairs only like EURUSD etc.
Less is more.
May 25 2010 at 13:48
Broker with 5 digits is a must for precise working scalper EAs, means old fashioned FXDrawDown is out of the race...
May 25 2010 at 14:45
The real contest is called life, it's with your live trading accounts and if you win it you get to have a life of plenty.
If you lose it you get to be poor.
Good luck
If you lose it you get to be poor.
Good luck
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
A real contest should be a live acct and starting at $100.
Jun 09 2010 at 14:11
1000 $ USD
5 digits
Leverage 200:1 and up
reputable, non USA broker
NDD, STP or ECN
😎
5 digits
Leverage 200:1 and up
reputable, non USA broker
NDD, STP or ECN
😎
Zaloguj się aby skomentować .
