Show your profitable account here.

Yijun posted:
Not many remaining. An analysis of those remaining could be used as a very good filter to find those traders who actually know how to trade and are worth contacting and following

psnowfox posted:

togr posted:

tamirsa posted:

togr posted:

tamirsa posted:

psnowfox posted:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/psnowfox/short-term-correlation/3176661


This thread is fun, it's like game The Werewolves of Millers Hollow, guess between serious traders and cheater who want to sell something. :)

The best filtering method I've found, is at any time, look at the page number of the recent post, let's call it X, then substruct x-300, let's call the new number Y.
Now, go to page number Y.
You don't have to scroll back manually, you can change the address of this page, where it says &p=X, simply change the X to your new page number Y and click Enter. Don't change any of the other fields.

Start clicking on account links from this page backward. You may do so by middle-clicking on all links on a page then take a look at the tabs which were opened, then go to the previous page and so on.
If you find an account which is not private, not closed, which belongs to a user who still exists, and the account is not wiped out, you have probably landed on a profitable account and you may want to follow it or copy its signals.

I warn you though - such a finding is very very hard. Probably a tedious task but should worth you more than any other algorithm for finding good accounts here.

I have tried so many times just to report all systems were gone.
Though many of them were clearly bad systems at the time of posting already.

So it was a nice experiment, wasn't it?
When people play with fire, other people get burned...
This shows us that people don't take trading seriously, because they can't even be consistent with the market for 2 or three years.

There are still some traders reamining :)

And those survived just laugh when sleazy salesmen start advertise for their strategies/EA and philosophy :)

Many here said a lot about money management, psychology, common sense of technical analysis, etc.

Very few shares detailed of their strategy in a trading context: Sharpe, mDD, turnover, margin, how they form portfolios (stats arb, mean-reverse, etc.), what is their VaR, how they hedge.

My old firm (xxxxxQuant) recruiter looked at this thread, no one shares those information.

togr posted:

psnowfox posted:

togr posted:

tamirsa posted:

togr posted:

tamirsa posted:

psnowfox posted:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/psnowfox/short-term-correlation/3176661


This thread is fun, it's like game The Werewolves of Millers Hollow, guess between serious traders and cheater who want to sell something. :)

The best filtering method I've found, is at any time, look at the page number of the recent post, let's call it X, then substruct x-300, let's call the new number Y.
Now, go to page number Y.
You don't have to scroll back manually, you can change the address of this page, where it says &p=X, simply change the X to your new page number Y and click Enter. Don't change any of the other fields.

Start clicking on account links from this page backward. You may do so by middle-clicking on all links on a page then take a look at the tabs which were opened, then go to the previous page and so on.
If you find an account which is not private, not closed, which belongs to a user who still exists, and the account is not wiped out, you have probably landed on a profitable account and you may want to follow it or copy its signals.

I warn you though - such a finding is very very hard. Probably a tedious task but should worth you more than any other algorithm for finding good accounts here.

I have tried so many times just to report all systems were gone.
Though many of them were clearly bad systems at the time of posting already.

So it was a nice experiment, wasn't it?
When people play with fire, other people get burned...
This shows us that people don't take trading seriously, because they can't even be consistent with the market for 2 or three years.

There are still some traders reamining :)

And those survived just laugh when sleazy salesmen start advertise for their strategies/EA and philosophy :)

Many here said a lot about money management, psychology, common sense of technical analysis, etc.

Very few shares detailed of their strategy in a trading context: Sharpe, mDD, turnover, margin, how they form portfolios (stats arb, mean-reverse, etc.), what is their VaR, how they hedge.

My old firm (xxxxxQuant) recruiter looked at this thread, no one shares those information.

I would say desrciption does not matter.
If there are consistent results for a long period, acceptable risk and profit you have a winner.

togr posted:
If the results are consistent then it does not matter if 50% annually is done on $1,000 or $100,000.

psnowfox posted:

togr posted:

tamirsa posted:

togr posted:

tamirsa posted:

psnowfox posted:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/psnowfox/short-term-correlation/3176661


This thread is fun, it's like game The Werewolves of Millers Hollow, guess between serious traders and cheater who want to sell something. :)

The best filtering method I've found, is at any time, look at the page number of the recent post, let's call it X, then substruct x-300, let's call the new number Y.
Now, go to page number Y.
You don't have to scroll back manually, you can change the address of this page, where it says &p=X, simply change the X to your new page number Y and click Enter. Don't change any of the other fields.

Start clicking on account links from this page backward. You may do so by middle-clicking on all links on a page then take a look at the tabs which were opened, then go to the previous page and so on.
If you find an account which is not private, not closed, which belongs to a user who still exists, and the account is not wiped out, you have probably landed on a profitable account and you may want to follow it or copy its signals.

I warn you though - such a finding is very very hard. Probably a tedious task but should worth you more than any other algorithm for finding good accounts here.

I have tried so many times just to report all systems were gone.
Though many of them were clearly bad systems at the time of posting already.

So it was a nice experiment, wasn't it?
When people play with fire, other people get burned...
This shows us that people don't take trading seriously, because they can't even be consistent with the market for 2 or three years.

There are still some traders reamining :)

And those survived just laugh when sleazy salesmen start advertise for their strategies/EA and philosophy :)

Many here said a lot about money management, psychology, common sense of technical analysis, etc.

Very few shares detailed of their strategy in a trading context: Sharpe, mDD, turnover, margin, how they form portfolios (stats arb, mean-reverse, etc.), what is their VaR, how they hedge.

My old firm (xxxxxQuant) recruiter looked at this thread, no one shares those information.

psnowfox posted:

togr posted:

psnowfox posted:

togr posted:

tamirsa posted:

togr posted:

tamirsa posted:

psnowfox posted:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/psnowfox/short-term-correlation/3176661


This thread is fun, it's like game The Werewolves of Millers Hollow, guess between serious traders and cheater who want to sell something. :)

The best filtering method I've found, is at any time, look at the page number of the recent post, let's call it X, then substruct x-300, let's call the new number Y.
Now, go to page number Y.
You don't have to scroll back manually, you can change the address of this page, where it says &p=X, simply change the X to your new page number Y and click Enter. Don't change any of the other fields.

Start clicking on account links from this page backward. You may do so by middle-clicking on all links on a page then take a look at the tabs which were opened, then go to the previous page and so on.
If you find an account which is not private, not closed, which belongs to a user who still exists, and the account is not wiped out, you have probably landed on a profitable account and you may want to follow it or copy its signals.

I warn you though - such a finding is very very hard. Probably a tedious task but should worth you more than any other algorithm for finding good accounts here.

I have tried so many times just to report all systems were gone.
Though many of them were clearly bad systems at the time of posting already.

So it was a nice experiment, wasn't it?
When people play with fire, other people get burned...
This shows us that people don't take trading seriously, because they can't even be consistent with the market for 2 or three years.

There are still some traders reamining :)

And those survived just laugh when sleazy salesmen start advertise for their strategies/EA and philosophy :)

Many here said a lot about money management, psychology, common sense of technical analysis, etc.

Very few shares detailed of their strategy in a trading context: Sharpe, mDD, turnover, margin, how they form portfolios (stats arb, mean-reverse, etc.), what is their VaR, how they hedge.

My old firm (xxxxxQuant) recruiter looked at this thread, no one shares those information.

I would say desrciption does not matter.
If there are consistent results for a long period, acceptable risk and profit you have a winner.

Consistent results for long period at which book size, bro? I am new to this, so I just wonder, how much those account hide the balance has actually? And what is the purpose of hiding balance in myfxbook?

Everyone has benchmark, mine is account make less than 30k - 50k yearly is just a joke (like myself :)).

tamirsa posted:

psnowfox posted:

togr posted:

tamirsa posted:

togr posted:

tamirsa posted:

psnowfox posted:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/psnowfox/short-term-correlation/3176661


This thread is fun, it's like game The Werewolves of Millers Hollow, guess between serious traders and cheater who want to sell something. :)

The best filtering method I've found, is at any time, look at the page number of the recent post, let's call it X, then substruct x-300, let's call the new number Y.
Now, go to page number Y.
You don't have to scroll back manually, you can change the address of this page, where it says &p=X, simply change the X to your new page number Y and click Enter. Don't change any of the other fields.

Start clicking on account links from this page backward. You may do so by middle-clicking on all links on a page then take a look at the tabs which were opened, then go to the previous page and so on.
If you find an account which is not private, not closed, which belongs to a user who still exists, and the account is not wiped out, you have probably landed on a profitable account and you may want to follow it or copy its signals.

I warn you though - such a finding is very very hard. Probably a tedious task but should worth you more than any other algorithm for finding good accounts here.

I have tried so many times just to report all systems were gone.
Though many of them were clearly bad systems at the time of posting already.

So it was a nice experiment, wasn't it?
When people play with fire, other people get burned...
This shows us that people don't take trading seriously, because they can't even be consistent with the market for 2 or three years.

There are still some traders reamining :)

And those survived just laugh when sleazy salesmen start advertise for their strategies/EA and philosophy :)

Many here said a lot about money management, psychology, common sense of technical analysis, etc.

Very few shares detailed of their strategy in a trading context: Sharpe, mDD, turnover, margin, how they form portfolios (stats arb, mean-reverse, etc.), what is their VaR, how they hedge.

My old firm (xxxxxQuant) recruiter looked at this thread, no one shares those information.

Most of what you wrote here could be calculated from the account's portfolio here.
You can simply take history trades and insert them in any Quants data analysis tool. Most of the tools do show all of these, only Myfxbook's metrics do not calculate them.

Tell your old firm recruiter to consult with his analyst and he'll find a way (of course, assuming that the trader has not hidden history as 'private').

Regarding 'how they form portfolios' and 'how they hedge' - these characteristics don't have to be disclosed in a private company or hedge fund.

tamirsa posted:

psnowfox posted:

togr posted:

psnowfox posted:

togr posted:

tamirsa posted:

togr posted:

tamirsa posted:

psnowfox posted:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/psnowfox/short-term-correlation/3176661


This thread is fun, it's like game The Werewolves of Millers Hollow, guess between serious traders and cheater who want to sell something. :)

The best filtering method I've found, is at any time, look at the page number of the recent post, let's call it X, then substruct x-300, let's call the new number Y.
Now, go to page number Y.
You don't have to scroll back manually, you can change the address of this page, where it says &p=X, simply change the X to your new page number Y and click Enter. Don't change any of the other fields.

Start clicking on account links from this page backward. You may do so by middle-clicking on all links on a page then take a look at the tabs which were opened, then go to the previous page and so on.
If you find an account which is not private, not closed, which belongs to a user who still exists, and the account is not wiped out, you have probably landed on a profitable account and you may want to follow it or copy its signals.

I warn you though - such a finding is very very hard. Probably a tedious task but should worth you more than any other algorithm for finding good accounts here.

I have tried so many times just to report all systems were gone.
Though many of them were clearly bad systems at the time of posting already.

So it was a nice experiment, wasn't it?
When people play with fire, other people get burned...
This shows us that people don't take trading seriously, because they can't even be consistent with the market for 2 or three years.

There are still some traders reamining :)

And those survived just laugh when sleazy salesmen start advertise for their strategies/EA and philosophy :)

Many here said a lot about money management, psychology, common sense of technical analysis, etc.

Very few shares detailed of their strategy in a trading context: Sharpe, mDD, turnover, margin, how they form portfolios (stats arb, mean-reverse, etc.), what is their VaR, how they hedge.

My old firm (xxxxxQuant) recruiter looked at this thread, no one shares those information.

I would say desrciption does not matter.
If there are consistent results for a long period, acceptable risk and profit you have a winner.

Consistent results for long period at which book size, bro? I am new to this, so I just wonder, how much those account hide the balance has actually? And what is the purpose of hiding balance in myfxbook?

Everyone has benchmark, mine is account make less than 30k - 50k yearly is just a joke (like myself :)).

I can answer one of your questions -
People have real accounts here and in certain countries, there are rules against disclosure of actual funds being traded, so if a trader wants to share his results, it must be spoken with percentages and not in dollar amount, otherwise it could be considered as a felony to advertise this account.

Another comment - your benchmark should not be based on amount per year, but rather on percentage per year.
If you're not satisfied with 30k-50k yearly, simply double your investment and you'll get 60k-100k yearly, and so on.
If the base investment is too high for you, then you should look at the yearly percentage and calculate how much are you willing to put and how much are you willing to risk in order to make X% per year.

psnowfox posted:

tamirsa posted:

psnowfox posted:

togr posted:

tamirsa posted:

togr posted:

tamirsa posted:

psnowfox posted:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/psnowfox/short-term-correlation/3176661


This thread is fun, it's like game The Werewolves of Millers Hollow, guess between serious traders and cheater who want to sell something. :)

The best filtering method I've found, is at any time, look at the page number of the recent post, let's call it X, then substruct x-300, let's call the new number Y.
Now, go to page number Y.
You don't have to scroll back manually, you can change the address of this page, where it says &p=X, simply change the X to your new page number Y and click Enter. Don't change any of the other fields.

Start clicking on account links from this page backward. You may do so by middle-clicking on all links on a page then take a look at the tabs which were opened, then go to the previous page and so on.
If you find an account which is not private, not closed, which belongs to a user who still exists, and the account is not wiped out, you have probably landed on a profitable account and you may want to follow it or copy its signals.

I warn you though - such a finding is very very hard. Probably a tedious task but should worth you more than any other algorithm for finding good accounts here.

I have tried so many times just to report all systems were gone.
Though many of them were clearly bad systems at the time of posting already.

So it was a nice experiment, wasn't it?
When people play with fire, other people get burned...
This shows us that people don't take trading seriously, because they can't even be consistent with the market for 2 or three years.

There are still some traders reamining :)

And those survived just laugh when sleazy salesmen start advertise for their strategies/EA and philosophy :)

Many here said a lot about money management, psychology, common sense of technical analysis, etc.

Very few shares detailed of their strategy in a trading context: Sharpe, mDD, turnover, margin, how they form portfolios (stats arb, mean-reverse, etc.), what is their VaR, how they hedge.

My old firm (xxxxxQuant) recruiter looked at this thread, no one shares those information.

Most of what you wrote here could be calculated from the account's portfolio here.
You can simply take history trades and insert them in any Quants data analysis tool. Most of the tools do show all of these, only Myfxbook's metrics do not calculate them.

Tell your old firm recruiter to consult with his analyst and he'll find a way (of course, assuming that the trader has not hidden history as 'private').

Regarding 'how they form portfolios' and 'how they hedge' - these characteristics don't have to be disclosed in a private company or hedge fund.

What is your quant data anlysis tool? Can you suggest?
And how you calculate turnover without knowing the balance?

psnowfox posted:

tamirsa posted:

psnowfox posted:

Consistent results for long period at which book size, bro? I am new to this, so I just wonder, how much those account hide the balance has actually? And what is the purpose of hiding balance in myfxbook?

Everyone has benchmark, mine is account make less than 30k - 50k yearly is just a joke (like myself :)).

I can answer one of your questions -
People have real accounts here and in certain countries, there are rules against disclosure of actual funds being traded, so if a trader wants to share his results, it must be spoken with percentages and not in dollar amount, otherwise it could be considered as a felony to advertise this account.

Another comment - your benchmark should not be based on amount per year, but rather on percentage per year.
If you're not satisfied with 30k-50k yearly, simply double your investment and you'll get 60k-100k yearly, and so on.
If the base investment is too high for you, then you should look at the yearly percentage and calculate how much are you willing to put and how much are you willing to risk in order to make X% per year.

Thank you for clarification, I personally don't know about non-disclosure rules. But funny is, Myfxbook knows your balance anyway once you upload your accounts here. Do those countries allows traders to show balance to Myfxbook?

Yeah, benchmark is benchmark, it shows the seriousness to me that traders invest their savings in their portfolios, strategies, not fitting data.

MasaForex15 posted:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/MaSaForex13/masa/3170426