FXJETBOT

Użytkownik usunął ten system.

FXJETBOT Omówić

Feb 09, 2023 at 22:54
Przeglądane 4,441
73 Replies
Uczestnik z Mar 02, 2020   10 postów
May 11, 2023 at 07:03
m0rius posted:
FXStabilizer is working from 2015 and has Martingale+Grid and still going. Dont tell me it its just luck.
Jet is working not perfect but i am betting my $ on him.
Remember HOPE its not a strategy but Martingale is event if its not working all the time.
Trie the bot and come with suggestions that can help. Or just stay away.
Didn't try FXStabilizer, but totally agree with you. Martingale is not a sin if it works well and has some stoploss and I can set the risks.
Uczestnik z Feb 25, 2017   29 postów
May 11, 2023 at 10:42
What he says is not completely true either. I have seen several versions of fxstabilizer fail...also, talking about one or very few is still unreliable information that you have luck with that case, it is not a probabilistic guarantee for the others, the martingale is the way almost certain to fail in forex I have seen many of these systems fail if it were so good we would all be millionaires in forex long ago
Uczestnik z Aug 19, 2022   71 postów
May 11, 2023 at 14:50
You still need to set up your EA. Too much drawdown and undulating movement. You either earn or lose a lot.
Uczestnik z Nov 01, 2020   1 postów
May 11, 2023 at 19:44
The most important is to make periodic withdrawals. Then it doesn’t matter for me if it blows my account from time to time. Every martingale strategy that more often makes money than blows account is great. Most people don’t understand this because they want to make millions from small deposits.
Uczestnik z May 06, 2023   46 postów
May 12, 2023 at 10:06
EA still need to focus on stability, control the position well
There is no need to pursue high profits
Stable EA plus appropriate manual risk control, in fact, monthly profits of 10% is not difficult
Yes, regular withdrawals are also very important,lol
Uczestnik z Jun 15, 2023   1 postów
Jun 15, 2023 at 16:08
So, today June 15th, after 11 weeks testing this EA on a demo account starting with 2300€, it finally blew up the account after having a margin call and a partially closure by the broker. The account was set to 40% risk (EA setting). The maximum achieved profit was around a 1000€. Following Jakub`s advise, a very small profit can be achieved by a withdrawal of some even smaller money every now and then. Ah i forgot, of course you won`t earn any reasonable money by this.
My conclusion in this is, one better get to know the secrets of trading and earn money your own instead of leaving all the risk to an EA.
Uczestnik z Nov 30, 2022   3 postów
Jun 15, 2023 at 17:01
RIP account
Uczestnik z Nov 30, 2021   28 postów
Jun 15, 2023 at 17:05
It happens in the best families. 😇
Uczestnik z Mar 16, 2023   1 postów
Jun 16, 2023 at 06:57
Rest in peace ><
Uczestnik z Mar 15, 2023   39 postów
Jun 17, 2023 at 11:11
hades0815 posted:
So, today June 15th, after 11 weeks testing this EA on a demo account starting with 2300€, it finally blew up the account after having a margin call and a partially closure by the broker. The account was set to 40% risk (EA setting). The maximum achieved profit was around a 1000€. Following Jakub`s advise, a very small profit can be achieved by a withdrawal of some even smaller money every now and then. Ah i forgot, of course you won`t earn any reasonable money by this.
My conclusion in this is, one better get to know the secrets of trading and earn money your own instead of leaving all the risk to an EA.

Company Forex Store doesn't care because it was just a cent account and that you lost money. They make money mainly by selling their high risk martingale EAs. They deleted the account and immediately replaced it with a new one.
Uczestnik z Feb 25, 2017   29 postów
Jun 18, 2023 at 11:34
It is better to learn to operate manually in forex and perhaps you will not become a millionaire but if you can earn money consistently... forget those EAS that are useless, better study the market I assure you that you will do better
Uczestnik z Mar 24, 2021   5 postów
Jul 04, 2023 at 11:22
HMSTOMAHAWKTRD posted:
It is better to learn to operate manually in forex and perhaps you will not become a millionaire but if you can earn money consistently... forget those EAS that are useless, better study the market I assure you that you will do better

the main issue is that if you apply a strategy, you don't have confidence in, you will loose 100%. No matter what this is. manual or using EAs.
Fx Jet is still alive. I guess the author just got rid of all the nice comments here.
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/fxjetbot/fxjetbot/10233536
Uczestnik z Feb 25, 2017   29 postów
Jul 04, 2023 at 12:21
EugenGFu posted:
HMSTOMAHAWKTRD posted:
It is better to learn to operate manually in forex and perhaps you will not become a millionaire but if you can earn money consistently... forget those EAS that are useless, better study the market I assure you that you will do better

the main issue is that if you apply a strategy, you don't have confidence in, you will loose 100%. No matter what this is. manual or using EAs.
Fx Jet is still alive. I guess the author just got rid of all the nice comments here.
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/fxjetbot/fxjetbot/10233536

We see the past account fallen ....is clear this is another account
Uczestnik z Sep 13, 2022   4 postów
Jul 21, 2023 at 11:56
I am tryng it again after the update but it has a big problem. It does not sell or buy on reverse, it does it ramdonly. Today i am losing more that 15 dollars on eurjpy 0.01 lots. Stabilizer just today opened and closed 17 dollars gain short time difference. It should wait to sell until it stop to grow on reverse.
Also it should be good if we could configure more things like SL,TP, orders quantity, order multiplier. Still have much to improve.
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*Komercyjne wykorzystanie i spam są nieprawidłowe i mogą spowodować zamknięcie konta.
Wskazówka: opublikowanie adresu URL obrazu / YouTube automatycznie wstawi go do twojego postu!
Wskazówka: wpisz znak@, aby automatycznie wypełnić nazwę użytkownika uczestniczącego w tej dyskusji.