Leo Trader Pro UC & UJ (Od rayong1)
Użytkownik usunął ten system.
Leo Trader Pro UC & UJ Omówić
Dec 28, 2010 at 11:30
Przeglądane 1,423
12 Replies
Uczestnik z Nov 26, 2010
126 postów
Dec 28, 2010 at 11:34
Looks like we're seeing some bigger drawdowns here. Lets see how it handles it.
Uczestnik z Nov 15, 2010
183 postów
Dec 28, 2010 at 16:02
(edytowane Dec 28, 2010 at 16:03)
Raymond: Keep in mind that this is the best time to test an EA, so I wouldn't be jumping to any conclusions yet. I have the GU/EU version and started running it on Dec 23/2010, and is doing okay, but I have 1 open Buy on the EU thats down -75 pips.
But its this Open Trade DD that most traders do not look at, and its just as important as the Maximal DD which is based on closed trades. Right now this UJ/UC version is at -18% OT DD, so the low .96% Maximal DD goes right out the window.
But its this Open Trade DD that most traders do not look at, and its just as important as the Maximal DD which is based on closed trades. Right now this UJ/UC version is at -18% OT DD, so the low .96% Maximal DD goes right out the window.
Uczestnik z Nov 26, 2010
126 postów
Dec 29, 2010 at 03:58
Agree, the open trade DD is the more important number. That's what triggers the margin calls.
Someone on FPA already had an account wipe out
Someone on FPA already had an account wipe out
Uczestnik z Mar 07, 2010
257 postów
Dec 29, 2010 at 04:03
(edytowane Dec 29, 2010 at 04:03)
rayong1 posted:somebody obviously wanted to get rich quicker than everyone else ...
Agree, the open trade DD is the more important number. That's what triggers the margin calls.
Someone on FPA already had an account wipe out
I would not even mention such a case ...
you do not overleverage hold&prey strategy ...
Uczestnik z Nov 15, 2010
183 postów
Dec 30, 2010 at 02:10
The Open Trade DD is currently at -28% of account balance, this is where it gets fun, we will soon see if these trades hit the SL. if they do then we will see a much bigger OT DD.
Everyone forgets about the OT DD, because MT4 along with most platforms dont show it at all, then the market (some times)turns around and everyone seems to forget about it. These open trades right now might take this up to the 35-50% OT DD area, which is a very scary and risky EA.
Everyone forgets about the OT DD, because MT4 along with most platforms dont show it at all, then the market (some times)turns around and everyone seems to forget about it. These open trades right now might take this up to the 35-50% OT DD area, which is a very scary and risky EA.
Uczestnik z Nov 26, 2010
126 postów
Dec 30, 2010 at 20:19
30% open trade drawdown as of now.
Uczestnik z Nov 15, 2010
183 postów
Jan 01, 2011 at 22:07
Raymond, I calculated that is these 4 open trades were to hit there SL, then we could see an OT DD of around 45-47%, and that is assuming that there are no more trades opened after the 2 UJ trades are closed first.
From what I can see here, the LTP does not have more than 4 open trades at anyone time, so we know that the maximum OT DD would be 4 X 330=1320 pips X # of lots.
But because the risk to reward ratio is terrible on this EA, its a bit of a crap shoot so far. if these 4 trades were to hit the SL then it would change to closed trade DD, and 45-47% either way is a huge DD to swallow.
From what I can see here, the LTP does not have more than 4 open trades at anyone time, so we know that the maximum OT DD would be 4 X 330=1320 pips X # of lots.
But because the risk to reward ratio is terrible on this EA, its a bit of a crap shoot so far. if these 4 trades were to hit the SL then it would change to closed trade DD, and 45-47% either way is a huge DD to swallow.
Uczestnik z Nov 26, 2010
126 postów
Jan 01, 2011 at 22:22
(edytowane Jan 01, 2011 at 22:25)
And if you have he EU and GU version running they should hedge each other out because as EU and GU goes up UC and UJ usually goes the other way. Great if they pick the right direction but when wrong all 4 pairs will bleed. Theoretical max OT with both version of LTP running would be 2640 pips. Huge indeed.
How close to a margin call will depend on the lot size you use.
Now that I've bought it I can see they are running 1 instance of MT4 for each currency pair. ie. they are running 1 instance of MT4 for just usdchf at 0.02 lots and another instance of mt4 for usdjpy at 0.03 lots.
How close to a margin call will depend on the lot size you use.
Now that I've bought it I can see they are running 1 instance of MT4 for each currency pair. ie. they are running 1 instance of MT4 for just usdchf at 0.02 lots and another instance of mt4 for usdjpy at 0.03 lots.
Uczestnik z Nov 15, 2010
183 postów
Jan 01, 2011 at 22:33
rayong1 posted:
And if you have he EU and GU version running they should hedge each other out because as EU and GU goes up UC and UJ usually goes the other way. Great if they pick the right direction but when wrong all 4 pairs will bleed. Theoretical max OT with both version of LTP running would be 2640 pips. Huge indeed.
How close to a margin call will depend on the lot size you use.
Now that I've bought it I can see they are running 1 instance of MT4 for each currency pair. ie. they are running 1 instance of MT4 for just usdchf at 0.02 lots and another instance of mt4 for usdjpy at 0.03 lots.
In light of that info, why not run these 4 pairs for a while, then just trade 1 pair that has the best results, and you could increase the risk slightly. The other question is whether or not the SL can be modified on a client to client basis?? Probably not I am betting, but it wouldnt be a big deal for them to make the SL adjustable.
Uczestnik z Nov 26, 2010
126 postów
Jan 01, 2011 at 22:43
Looking at USDJPY, that looks like the more profitable pair.
Uczestnik z Nov 26, 2010
126 postów
May 16, 2011 at 08:08
Guys, I'm closing this myfxbook account. If you guys want it kept going I'll leave it alone.
*Komercyjne wykorzystanie i spam są nieprawidłowe i mogą spowodować zamknięcie konta.
Wskazówka: opublikowanie adresu URL obrazu / YouTube automatycznie wstawi go do twojego postu!
Wskazówka: wpisz znak@, aby automatycznie wypełnić nazwę użytkownika uczestniczącego w tej dyskusji.
