Advertisement
SystemsFX.net (andryuha77) (Od andryuha77)
The user has made his system private.
SystemsFX.net (andryuha77) Omówić
Uczestnik z May 21, 2010
13 postów
Aug 05, 2010 at 21:38
gross_alex posted:
please can i get the link for these signals,
thanks.
Отправил 😄
Uczestnik z Oct 18, 2009
7 postów
Sep 29, 2010 at 08:17
Hej andryuha77 - can you send me also a PM with the Lint to ypur Signals - Thanks a lot 😎
Mit System zum Trading Erfolg
forex_trader_4072
Uczestnik z Dec 05, 2009
19 postów
Oct 09, 2010 at 06:44
How would someone following your signal on zulutrade overcome the variable lot size? how should they set you up on there, fixed lots or variable lot size with % of balance?
Uczestnik z May 21, 2010
13 postów
Oct 20, 2010 at 20:54
88cefiro posted:
How would someone following your signal on zulutrade overcome the variable lot size? how should they set you up on there, fixed lots or variable lot size with % of balance?
In the majority subscribers are using fixed lots.
Uczestnik z May 21, 2010
13 postów
Oct 20, 2010 at 20:58
Treptowjens posted:
Hej andryuha77 - can you send me also a PM with the Lint to ypur Signals - Thanks a lot 😎
Done.
Uczestnik z Aug 20, 2009
208 postów
Oct 22, 2010 at 20:11
(edytowane Oct 22, 2010 at 20:35)
This system is the presently nr.1 ranked system at Zulutrade as far as I know:
http://zulutrade.com/TradeHistoryIndividual.aspx?pid=11487
Their main page is at http://systemsfx.net/en
Note that four out of the ten trading months had negative equity. This indicates that the system is gambling. An engineered system must have every single month in positive equity because the patterns than one trades repeats themselves on a daily basis. July/Aug were two months of negative growth in a row and then two months of positive growth. But the same patterns repeated themselves in Sept/Oct that were in Jul/Aug. This means that the Sept/Oct growth has nothing to do with break-outs or parabolic stops but were a random event that just so happened to coincide with their EA break-out system.
On this site http://www.onix-trade.net/?act=monitoring_stat&xid=8809 it seems as if you took $4000 to $68000 but on myfxbook, it indicates a deposit of around $48000 that grew to $68000 with a more modest gain thus of around 30%. Would you care to clarify the difference?
http://zulutrade.com/TradeHistoryIndividual.aspx?pid=11487
Their main page is at http://systemsfx.net/en
Note that four out of the ten trading months had negative equity. This indicates that the system is gambling. An engineered system must have every single month in positive equity because the patterns than one trades repeats themselves on a daily basis. July/Aug were two months of negative growth in a row and then two months of positive growth. But the same patterns repeated themselves in Sept/Oct that were in Jul/Aug. This means that the Sept/Oct growth has nothing to do with break-outs or parabolic stops but were a random event that just so happened to coincide with their EA break-out system.
On this site http://www.onix-trade.net/?act=monitoring_stat&xid=8809 it seems as if you took $4000 to $68000 but on myfxbook, it indicates a deposit of around $48000 that grew to $68000 with a more modest gain thus of around 30%. Would you care to clarify the difference?
forex_trader_4072
Uczestnik z Dec 05, 2009
19 postów
Oct 23, 2010 at 03:28
stephanusR posted:
On this site http://www.onix-trade.net/?act=monitoring_stat&xid=8809 it seems as if you took $4000 to $68000 but on myfxbook, it indicates a deposit of around $48000 that grew to $68000 with a more modest gain thus of around 30%. Would you care to clarify the difference?
Its in the top right hand corner of that page champ,
Recharge | Withdrawal, USD 48354.22 | -4449.17
I've been watching him on all those sites for a few months and his system does seem to work, though for followers using fixed lot size not so well. IE - zulutrade.
*Komercyjne wykorzystanie i spam są nieprawidłowe i mogą spowodować zamknięcie konta.
Wskazówka: opublikowanie adresu URL obrazu / YouTube automatycznie wstawi go do twojego postu!
Wskazówka: wpisz znak@, aby automatycznie wypełnić nazwę użytkownika uczestniczącego w tej dyskusji.
