Signal Start Wyniki przeglądu

Я думаю надо доработать статистику подписчиков, немного запутанно. Я думаю интереснее было бы видеть просто ввиде таблице... ID клиента, Дата начала, количество подписанных месяцев, Название системы, сумма, активный подписчик выделялся бы зелёным цветом, неактивный красным соответственно. и было бы красиво,удобно и понятно. По мимо всего подписчиков через слеш отображать количество активных.

good

Excellent

Not the best signals. Signal providers earn more money trough the income of subscribers than on trading (read:gambling) itself

this is very helpful in getting where i need to go.

ни о чем

I like that service.

too expensive. need to pay 25$ per account ?? plus the signal fee

Disappointing

Good and reliable service and reasonable pricing, happy with the service.

good service

Expensive Price your service

TRADEFX2016 posted:
I am signal provider and I am really not happy the way signalstart collects 30% from provider and also 25 USD from subscribers on monthly basis. this really affects our clients and our following, also there is no way to reach to new subscribers, you must make a main page where we can interact with people to make them subscribe to our signals, getting client is really tough for us. there is no way to advertise our signals. most people sitting on the top ranking are not even trading now, they just manipulated results by adding more money on later stages to increase the growth and now those traders who trade on daily basis cant be on top lists.

true, very expensive.... but quality has its price !

Good

jeremy152 posted:
The platform is good and customer service of SS is good. However the 4 or 5 signals I've tried either stop trading and don't tell you, or aren't profitable enough to cover their subscription fees.

you can always contact support and ask for refund if trading is completely stopped from a provider.

Its very soon for me to have a strong opinion. I use your signal from a few days and i need some more time...

The platform is good and customer service of SS is good. However the 4 or 5 signals I've tried either stop trading and don't tell you, or aren't profitable enough to cover their subscription fees.

so where are the results from leading signal providers?

My rating is based on the following:
(1) Platform reports draw down % incorrectly e.g. The best of the best signal had 5.6% maximum draw down % on Friday 10/11 and today it is zero. This means that draw down % for many signals could be grossly understated thereby resulting in increased risk for followers;
(2) Customer Service :(a) Interaction with Traders is a common and necessary feature for any good signal service e.g. Zulutrade; Mql5, etc. This enables followers to obtain up to date status of any signal being followed e.g. How does a follower know when a signal provider has stopped trading if the follower can not even ask questions?
(b) It takes forever for Chris the only support person to answer emails. Why not add staff and include online chat like other good signal providers e.g. Zulutrade;
(3) Charging separately for an account is ridiculous since you can't receive signals without having an account. Simplify the pricing and bundle into one simple price.
(4) The ranking system is not explained anywhere unlike some other signal platforms e g. FXSTAT. The ranking seems to favour new very short term providers who seem to the 'gaming' the system by pumping up profitability (sometimes with massive risk) within the first month, then trade differently for subsequent months (e.g. BAT system) without informing followers or adjusting their fees.