Anthony Wins Omówić

bearwa posted:
This the 3rd time this has happened with this broker. I can't remember the other 2x account names but very similar story about 2 or 3 years of wins, gets everyone to pile in more and more money. Account gets up to enough size and then kaboomm.

Last time was really weird, traded Nok/USD or some strange pair that was extremely volatile, loaded up 2x 1000 lot trades and lost ~$4Mil in 2hrs. Can't remmeber the screenname, sure it listed in the past forum somewhere.

Enough is enough someone needs to report these brokers to the authorities

I have warned everybody months ago
vontogr (togr) Jun 23 at 16:06
It is very simple guys,
it can be a scam unless you show such results on some reputable brokers.

I have seen many fake systems with unreal results on AccentForex. So beware.
Don't get fooled and waste your hard earn money
or do and then don't complain :)

I am doing fine, not the end of the day for me. I was aware of this broker had the same situation happened twice. Just blow up a few million dollars account in one shot. They are good at it. I thought Tony would be a different case since he has been trading for 5 years and with very good risk management. I guess it is all the same game this broker play. Made up some fund manager,
trade for a while with great records and one day just made up some fake trade and blow up the whole account, keep all investor's money.

MP_89 posted:

i think trade with ea helps the beginners better understand the market. and it’s quite good trading experience.

you asks me about arguments.
i'll tell you most important argument for ea. huge time savings.
1. i dont fully researching the current market situation, i dont make forecasts, etc. the advisor does all this for me.
2. i dont need to stay awake for days and monitor the minimum oscilation of each pips.
3. i get a constant profit.
want more arguments? trade with ea at least once. then you'll understand.

Oh, and how dos using EA help newcomer understand the market without trading?
It's not at all necessary to constantly be near the terminal to trade. You can take long-term trading as a basis, instead of nervous scalping.
In the first point, you say that you don't follow the market analysis. And wha will happen if a trend ea gets into a flat correction and you will not be near the terminal to turn it off?

VancouverRain posted:
Of course, non of the brokers will not show their books at anyone's request...and we are not talking about a few hundred dollars win or loss. No one can see where the orders been sent to, or the money has gone to. Just a short story about a fund manager who was sick and took pills....forgot to set stoploss.

you answered your own question imho
no broker will not show their books at anyone's request ..
so, what difference does it make about what amounts are in question, if none of the brokers showes this information?
is it broker who telling you about fund manager who was sick and took pills? 😲

oportunis posted:

MP_89 posted:

disagree with you dude. you say manual trading is safer, since you can set sl and tp if you sleep f.ex. but all this's far from being so safe. sl is triggered at the current market price and if such things as elections, cataclysms, covid, etc. occur, then the price can go up/down to 100 points per second. and your sl will close respectively not where you expected.
so if we're talking about safety, then i'll trust ea more.

Anyway stop posting in this thread, I warned people this was a scam now you see the proof and start searching for answers on Accent broker and find who is Anthony. Spread the word about what they did to you and others here, so they don't fall for the same trap. There is a new scam going on it's called RoFX, find it here in myfxbook and warn others! Help them to not make the same mistake. Investing in an unregulated broker is a red flag! They can do anything they want...

you are wrong @oportunis
everyone shares their opinion on forum. you share yours, I share mine, other people share theirs accordingly. you have no right to tell who to post or stop posting and where.
and about your post, i would repeat what i said earlier, because these are home truths
1. no one should accuse another person without any evidence. all these assumptions are irrelevant. at least 95% of traders lose their accounts partially or completely according to statistics. so in 95% of cases you will be right.
2. why are you wasting your energy warning naive investors? as long as the market, trust management exists, there will be investors and there will be losses.
investors must understand the risks of forex and diversify risk, if they got money to burn, then there is no need to warn such people.

this is my firm opinion. people going to brokers always know where they are going. they know when these brokers are not regulated or at least by fca. they are looking for big leverage or better terms. So why, when after all they do not like smth, the word scam suddenly pops out?
i do not feel sorry for such people. at all. imho

Blocked.

Mathias88 posted:
you are wrong @oportunis
everyone shares their opinion on forum. you share yours, I share mine, other people share theirs accordingly. you have no right to tell who to post or stop posting and where.
and about your post, i would repeat what i said earlier, because these are home truths
1. no one should accuse another person without any evidence. all these assumptions are irrelevant. at least 95% of traders lose their accounts partially or completely according to statistics. so in 95% of cases you will be right.
2. why are you wasting your energy warning naive investors? as long as the market, trust management exists, there will be investors and there will be losses.
investors must understand the risks of forex and diversify risk, if they got money to burn, then there is no need to warn such people.

this is my firm opinion. people going to brokers always know where they are going. they know when these brokers are not regulated or at least by fca. they are looking for big leverage or better terms. So why, when after all they do not like smth, the word scam suddenly pops out?
i do not feel sorry for such people. at all. imho

I'm not wrong, because I have proof of how brokers can fake trades... Anyone with mql license can do it. If you want to see it send me a private message because they block it here.

If a broker is not regulated they can produce any trades they want without them being sent to the market and they can do a Ponzi scheme, pay those 5-10% of profitable traders with 90% of deposit from losing trades. They promote a safe PAM account where DD is under control and they produce a good profit, so they lore investors in and accumulate enough. Once they are happy with money accumulated then suddenly in just one day it all blows. This is not the first rodeo they did. Also yes traders can lose money, but with regulated brokers, you have an audit that can verify this, while with unregulated brokers they can do whatever they like. Anthony could as easily have opened a MAM account at ICMarkets or any other reputable broker, but he didn't. Why would he limit himself? It's easy to just use a master account and copy trades to other brokers, why limit his earnings unless he is a partner with the broker. Nobody would say anything if he would lose a few trades but to blow it all in a few hours is ridiculous for someone that manages millions. Do you think that a trader that earns 100k a month can't afford a risk management team or at least setup equity protecting EA? Come on...

oportunis posted:

MP_89 posted:

disagree with you dude. you say manual trading is safer, since you can set sl and tp if you sleep f.ex. but all this's far from being so safe. sl is triggered at the current market price and if such things as elections, cataclysms, covid, etc. occur, then the price can go up/down to 100 points per second. and your sl will close respectively not where you expected.
so if we're talking about safety, then i'll trust ea more.

Really so how does Ea know when to stop trading? Humans can stop trading before such events, EA doesn't, it has algorithm with parameters and once they are there it executes trade no matter of sentiment and human behavior, so you saying SL is not executed is more true for EA than for human that knows how to trade and is waiting for calm market...

Again, you talk the talk but you have nothing to show for... Where is your account with EA that we can track? You can check how I trade and I use both EA and my manual trading. I'm in forex for a whale so I know trading with just EA doesn't work otherwise there would be EA that lasts longer than a few months. You need to tweak EA the same as you need your manual trading and adapt to the market, so saying EA is set and forget is not true...

Anyway stop posting in this thread, I warned people this was a scam now you see the proof and start searching for answers on Accent broker and find who is Anthony. Spread the word about what they did to you and others here, so they don't fall for the same trap. There is a new scam going on it's called RoFX, find it here in myfxbook and warn others! Help them to not make the same mistake. Investing in an unregulated broker is a red flag! They can do anything they want...

you want track my account but dear its not possible yet. i withdrawn the profit i earned and closed account. while i took a break from trading until the end of the year.
that's right dear, ea has an algorithm for working. you're right. it has no emotions and can't make mistakes cause nervous!!!!
if you trade with ea, then you understand alas it's not perfect and needs to be corrected. but still i prefer trade with advisor. and you can't convince me. 😉😉

oportunis posted:

I'm not wrong, because I have proof of how brokers can fake trades... Anyone with mql license can do it. If you want to see it send me a private message because they block it here.
Why would he limit himself? It's easy to just use a master account and copy trades to other brokers, why limit his earnings unless he is a partner with the broker. Nobody would say anything if he would lose a few trades but to blow it all in a few hours is ridiculous for someone that manages millions. Do you think that a trader that earns 100k a month can't afford a risk management team or at least setup equity protecting EA? Come on...

I said you are wrong in that you start telling someone what to post or not to post, and not about your thoughts...
if you want, you can send me proofs in pm, i am an curious person and always open for discussion and exchange of opinions.
but if i mentioned i have proof in discussion of a topic, then I would show this proof too for everyone to see.

I am familiar with management.
i want to tell you that it is the successful forex traders who lose accounts most often abruptly in almost one market movement.
this is not greed as many people think, this is self-confidence or arrogance.
a trait ordinary traders who are trading up to 50k usually do not have.
after being successful for so long, really cool traders think they understand the market and understand risk management.
but no! the market always shows the opposite.
the problem is that we may seem wise and be able to discuss it. but the whole point is, until you or me manage millions, we will never understand this as deeply as we should.

@oportunis

Hey,
I read your post and realized that you write having no idea of the real situation. Everything you say could exist if the money were locked and being accumulated. But they weren't locked, and ivestors are able to withdraw funds. (you refute it in your post). Iam Tony's ib and I can tell you that the trading period lasts 10 days, meaning that every 10 days funds can be withdrawn and every investor can submit a whole amount request at any time.
And no need to talk about brokers here, it looks like an advertisement. I saw a lot of negative reviews about icmarkets as well.
I suppose this is not about the broker, more like unfortunately Tony got into statistics 98%.

oportunis posted:

Mathias88 posted:
you are wrong @oportunis
everyone shares their opinion on forum. you share yours, I share mine, other people share theirs accordingly. you have no right to tell who to post or stop posting and where.
and about your post, i would repeat what i said earlier, because these are home truths
1. no one should accuse another person without any evidence. all these assumptions are irrelevant. at least 95% of traders lose their accounts partially or completely according to statistics. so in 95% of cases you will be right.
2. why are you wasting your energy warning naive investors? as long as the market, trust management exists, there will be investors and there will be losses.
investors must understand the risks of forex and diversify risk, if they got money to burn, then there is no need to warn such people.

this is my firm opinion. people going to brokers always know where they are going. they know when these brokers are not regulated or at least by fca. they are looking for big leverage or better terms. So why, when after all they do not like smth, the word scam suddenly pops out?
i do not feel sorry for such people. at all. imho

I'm not wrong, because I have proof of how brokers can fake trades... Anyone with mql license can do it. If you want to see it send me a private message because they block it here.

If a broker is not regulated they can produce any trades they want without them being sent to the market and they can do a Ponzi scheme, pay those 5-10% of profitable traders with 90% of deposit from losing trades. They promote a safe PAM account where DD is under control and they produce a good profit, so they lore investors in and accumulate enough. Once they are happy with money accumulated then suddenly in just one day it all blows. This is not the first rodeo they did. Also yes traders can lose money, but with regulated brokers, you have an audit that can verify this, while with unregulated brokers they can do whatever they like. Anthony could as easily have opened a MAM account at ICMarkets or any other reputable broker, but he didn't. Why would he limit himself? It's easy to just use a master account and copy trades to other brokers, why limit his earnings unless he is a partner with the broker. Nobody would say anything if he would lose a few trades but to blow it all in a few hours is ridiculous for someone that manages millions. Do you think that a trader that earns 100k a month can't afford a risk management team or at least setup equity protecting EA? Come on...

Yep. 100% agreed. We have the proof, but a lot of people don't want to believe it. Many of us knew what would take place here. Rinse and repeat sadly.

Mathias88 posted:

oportunis posted:

I'm not wrong, because I have proof of how brokers can fake trades... Anyone with mql license can do it. If you want to see it send me a private message because they block it here.
Why would he limit himself? It's easy to just use a master account and copy trades to other brokers, why limit his earnings unless he is a partner with the broker. Nobody would say anything if he would lose a few trades but to blow it all in a few hours is ridiculous for someone that manages millions. Do you think that a trader that earns 100k a month can't afford a risk management team or at least setup equity protecting EA? Come on...

I said you are wrong in that you start telling someone what to post or not to post, and not about your thoughts...
if you want, you can send me proofs in pm, i am an curious person and always open for discussion and exchange of opinions.
but if i mentioned i have proof in discussion of a topic, then I would show this proof too for everyone to see.

I am familiar with management.
i want to tell you that it is the successful forex traders who lose accounts most often abruptly in almost one market movement.
this is not greed as many people think, this is self-confidence or arrogance.
a trait ordinary traders who are trading up to 50k usually do not have.
after being successful for so long, really cool traders think they understand the market and understand risk management.
but no! the market always shows the opposite.
the problem is that we may seem wise and be able to discuss it. but the whole point is, until you or me manage millions, we will never understand this as deeply as we should.

No professional trader blows an account in a few hours, trust me no matter how cocky they are. They have arrived at this level by being smart, not arrogant and all use risk management. Ask accent broker for trade tickets and LP they used so you can try to audit their claims.

profitBottle posted:
@oportunis

Hey,
I read your post and realized that you write having no idea of the real situation. Everything you say could exist if the money were locked and being accumulated. But they weren't locked, and ivestors are able to withdraw funds. (you refute it in your post). Iam Tony's ib and I can tell you that the trading period lasts 10 days, meaning that every 10 days funds can be withdrawn and every investor can submit a whole amount request at any time.
And no need to talk about brokers here, it looks like an advertisement. I saw a lot of negative reviews about icmarkets as well.
I suppose this is not about the broker, more like unfortunately Tony got into statistics 98%.

There is talk about the unregulated brokers, and if you lock even for 10 days it means it's not what regulated brokers have. You can withdraw your funds the second you deposit in, with no lock-in period. ICMarket is regulated, it's just one of the popular reputable brokers I mention, they can have bad reviews but they will not cheat you out of money with some scheme. You can easily lose it with them too if you have no idea how to trade, like 90% of users. However, they are regulated by ASIC and are audited regularly, so the numbers they produce are legit. Accent forex has nothing. The problem is also not with an offshore broker but with the scheme, since several people asked for proof of trading from Anthony, he could have just opened a small account at some other regulated broker, verify account here and we would all stay quiet. But being exclusive to one broker means he is working with them, so chances of manipulation are big. If broker knows he brings hundreds of new users they will cook the numbers to look great and lure more users in. What is stopping them to plan an exit strategy and split the money in PAM amongst themselves? Blame it on the market, so there won't be any questions and continue again with some new fake PAM? You being an IB, can you prove to us there was no scam behind all of this? Can you show us tickets of all trades and liquidity providers that accepted them? Can you show us an audit of your broker's financials? A reputable accounting firm that will stand by those numbers would suffice and establish a trust to old and new users...
  

oportunis posted:

Mathias88 posted:

oportunis posted:

I'm not wrong, because I have proof of how brokers can fake trades... Anyone with mql license can do it. If you want to see it send me a private message because they block it here.
Why would he limit himself? It's easy to just use a master account and copy trades to other brokers, why limit his earnings unless he is a partner with the broker. Nobody would say anything if he would lose a few trades but to blow it all in a few hours is ridiculous for someone that manages millions. Do you think that a trader that earns 100k a month can't afford a risk management team or at least setup equity protecting EA? Come on...

I said you are wrong in that you start telling someone what to post or not to post, and not about your thoughts...
if you want, you can send me proofs in pm, i am an curious person and always open for discussion and exchange of opinions.
but if i mentioned i have proof in discussion of a topic, then I would show this proof too for everyone to see.

I am familiar with management.
i want to tell you that it is the successful forex traders who lose accounts most often abruptly in almost one market movement.
this is not greed as many people think, this is self-confidence or arrogance.
a trait ordinary traders who are trading up to 50k usually do not have.
after being successful for so long, really cool traders think they understand the market and understand risk management.
but no! the market always shows the opposite.
the problem is that we may seem wise and be able to discuss it. but the whole point is, until you or me manage millions, we will never understand this as deeply as we should.

No professional trader blows an account in a few hours, trust me no matter how cocky they are. They have arrived at this level by being smart, not arrogant and all use risk management. Ask accent broker for trade tickets and LP they used so you can try to audit their claims.

Totally agree with you oportunis!

Mathias88 posted:

VancouverRain posted:
My questions were not answered! They were just telling me to read again the document I signed when I registered.
We are dealing with a 10 million dollars 'mistake' or fraud' here. Of course, non of the brokers will not show their books at anyone's request...and we are not talking about a few hundred dollars win or loss.

who are 'we' in your post? i have got the only thing is you are or were the follower of this account. you still didnt answer what exactly you were explained. well, so be it, apparently you have your own aims. I see you do not want to figure it out, you already KNOW and DECIDED everything for yourself.
what abstract numbers are you talking about? how much exactly did you lose? or maybe you have got a profit?
i already wrote something similar somewhere on the forum, but i can repeat it here:
investors must understand the risks of forex and diversify risks by investing in different accounts or areas. and if they got money to burn, then there is no need to talk about their money. this is my 2 cents

How much I have lost is not your business.

Who blow up the account? You can ask Tony!

@oportunis

First, I'm sure that you're simply confused, because pamm is not a mam and investors keep their funds on one mutual trading account and the withdrawal at any time can affect the trading. Therefore, there is such a thing as a trading period. We are not talking about 10 days of trading. We are talking about many years of trading, which included more than 100 trading periods, where everyone can get their funds.

When you talk about bad reviews, are you implying that this is not true about icmarkets?
If you really wanna talk about regulators, then I can give you a way for thoughts. What if each regulator is a state-level business? I suppose the money that goes there is hard to imagine. Now tell me, what does every participant in the world market strive for? Yeah, full monopoly. Therefore, you can constantly observe only the same regulators names, which are considered the most reliable, but you may not think Metatrader is the best terminal, but you probably use it, like me and all the others. Total monopoly.

@oportunis

Let Tony answer, if he wants, the questions that are addressed to him.
You also forget about such a concept as the presumption of innocence, when no one except the accusing party is obliged to provide any evidence. So, I also want to know what kind of 'proof' you are talking about.

You probably misunderstood me, I'm just a pamm ib client of accent and sure I don't have such information. But I can tell you for sure that none of the brokers, regardless of their reputation, will give you an audit of financials except for companies whose shares are publicly traded on the stock exchange.
If you think that this information can be provided, show who and when gave it to you. You defend icemarkets so much that it's even a little suspicious .. (I'm not against them, just my opinion).

Samuelkoi posted:

MP_89 posted:

i think trade with ea helps the beginners better understand the market. and it’s quite good trading experience.

you asks me about arguments.
i'll tell you most important argument for ea. huge time savings.
1. i dont fully researching the current market situation, i dont make forecasts, etc. the advisor does all this for me.
2. i dont need to stay awake for days and monitor the minimum oscilation of each pips.
3. i get a constant profit.
want more arguments? trade with ea at least once. then you'll understand.

Oh, and how dos using EA help newcomer understand the market without trading?
It's not at all necessary to constantly be near the terminal to trade. You can take long-term trading as a basis, instead of nervous scalping.
In the first point, you say that you don't follow the market analysis. And wha will happen if a trend ea gets into a flat correction and you will not be near the terminal to turn it off?

ea'll help beginners by analyzing its work, the signals by which it opens and closes orders. over time beginners understand by what criteria their advisor opens new positions. and then beginners will already understand whether he wants to trade with ea or manualy.
and you twist my words!! i didn’t say i don’t follow market analysis at all. i said i don't do it fully.
and i repeat 100 times more that ea needs to be updated. of course if you don't do it you'll lose sooner or later.
so think before you write any nonsense, dear!

oportunis posted:

Mathias88 posted:

oportunis posted:

I'm not wrong, because I have proof of how brokers can fake trades... Anyone with mql license can do it. If you want to see it send me a private message because they block it here.
Why would he limit himself? It's easy to just use a master account and copy trades to other brokers, why limit his earnings unless he is a partner with the broker. Nobody would say anything if he would lose a few trades but to blow it all in a few hours is ridiculous for someone that manages millions. Do you think that a trader that earns 100k a month can't afford a risk management team or at least setup equity protecting EA? Come on...

I said you are wrong in that you start telling someone what to post or not to post, and not about your thoughts...
if you want, you can send me proofs in pm, i am an curious person and always open for discussion and exchange of opinions.
but if i mentioned i have proof in discussion of a topic, then I would show this proof too for everyone to see.

I am familiar with management.
i want to tell you that it is the successful forex traders who lose accounts most often abruptly in almost one market movement.
this is not greed as many people think, this is self-confidence or arrogance.
a trait ordinary traders who are trading up to 50k usually do not have.
after being successful for so long, really cool traders think they understand the market and understand risk management.
but no! the market always shows the opposite.
the problem is that we may seem wise and be able to discuss it. but the whole point is, until you or me manage millions, we will never understand this as deeply as we should.

No professional trader blows an account in a few hours, trust me no matter how cocky they are. They have arrived at this level by being smart, not arrogant and all use risk management. Ask accent broker for trade tickets and LP they used so you can try to audit their claims.

i see your point, but i have my own opinion i already said. i thought we were discussing account here, but you are increasingly switching to a broker. i am not their client and have no right or desire to ask/claim anything. if you are their client, ask by yourself.