Edit Your Comment
Risk and Rewards
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 22, 2015
178 โพสต์
forex_trader_149646
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 09, 2013
471 โพสต์
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 22, 2015
178 โพสต์
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 22, 2015
178 โพสต์
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 09, 2014
65 โพสต์
Feb 26, 2015 at 20:16
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 09, 2014
65 โพสต์
growthera posted:50% win is good, if TP more than SL. There are a lot of successfull scalping strategies where TP less than SL, and people earn big money. Anyway there is also spread and commission so hope for 50% its too poor I think
I do not know if you can call that a strategy, but for me to open a trade there must be a 2:1 potential. To achieve that, I only strive for a 50% winning trades.
There can't be enough money
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 22, 2015
178 โพสต์
Feb 27, 2015 at 07:23
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 22, 2015
178 โพสต์
The Risk & Reward ratio should show number similar to 1:3
meaning it will calculate how much the stop loss is, and how much the take profit or closed trade value. Then display a ratio 1:2, 1:3, 1: 4, ect...
If no value of stop loss is entered in the trade, then it will display N/A
I've attached a picture to show you where to add Risk & Reward ratio for each trade.
meaning it will calculate how much the stop loss is, and how much the take profit or closed trade value. Then display a ratio 1:2, 1:3, 1: 4, ect...
If no value of stop loss is entered in the trade, then it will display N/A
I've attached a picture to show you where to add Risk & Reward ratio for each trade.
I trade Forex using my Bollinger Trend PRO mt4 indicator.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 22, 2015
178 โพสต์
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Oct 11, 2013
775 โพสต์
Mar 02, 2015 at 11:04
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Oct 11, 2013
775 โพสต์
Most trading manuals and books out there recommend using a 1:3 risk reward ratio, but the truth is that the market will no always give you that chance, so I will go for a 1:1, but sometimes I may get the opportunity to go for 1:2 and rarely a 1:3.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 06, 2013
137 โพสต์
Mar 02, 2015 at 13:26
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 06, 2013
137 โพสต์
We go for a 2:1 R:R with a max risk of 1% per trade.
Our latest member made +5% last week doing that on his first live account - he is linked to my profile.
Our latest member made +5% last week doing that on his first live account - he is linked to my profile.
HOLY GRAIL: Fundamental Analysis to chose your pairs/direction, Technical Entry/SL/TP for consistent Management of those decisions
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 06, 2013
137 โพสต์
Mar 03, 2015 at 07:26
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 06, 2013
137 โพสต์
Yeah for sure, and fixed spreads where possible... Though the account I linked today is instafx and thats trading the live high impact news but totally right Ecn - far better
HOLY GRAIL: Fundamental Analysis to chose your pairs/direction, Technical Entry/SL/TP for consistent Management of those decisions
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 23, 2010
17 โพสต์
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 06, 2013
137 โพสต์
Mar 06, 2015 at 15:19
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 06, 2013
137 โพสต์
comeinvest posted:
although most of the fx training would advice go for low risk high rewards trades but i personally feel that trade management ( when the trade is open) is more important than quantify the risk reward in number.
Very true - trade management is key but you need that innitial controlled risk when ordering in and trading - imagine being in the shoes of those people in the CHF when the SNB removed the floor if they hadnt got good risk measures in place in terms of low risk sls etc etc
I know many who lost their entire life savings in 10 seconds when it happened due to no risk control.
Great comments ALfred :)
HOLY GRAIL: Fundamental Analysis to chose your pairs/direction, Technical Entry/SL/TP for consistent Management of those decisions
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 23, 2010
17 โพสต์
Mar 06, 2015 at 17:20
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 23, 2010
17 โพสต์
BenNathanFTA posted:comeinvest posted:
although most of the fx training would advice go for low risk high rewards trades but i personally feel that trade management ( when the trade is open) is more important than quantify the risk reward in number.
Very true - trade management is key but you need that innitial controlled risk when ordering in and trading - imagine being in the shoes of those people in the CHF when the SNB removed the floor if they hadnt got good risk measures in place in terms of low risk sls etc etc
I know many who lost their entire life savings in 10 seconds when it happened due to no risk control.
Great comments ALfred :)
Actually the CHF news have just enlighten me on how we should trade news events , IMO high impact news event it's similar to gambling especially related to interest rate. A good trader always know how to measure the risk before look after the reward, it's good habit to know how much you're willing to lose on this trade before measuring the potential profit. Apart from that, when you're in profit, always look for counter signal sign and once you spot it, close the trade with no hard feeling.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Oct 11, 2013
775 โพสต์
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 06, 2013
137 โพสต์
Apr 07, 2015 at 07:48
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 06, 2013
137 โพสต์
Kuzma_ua posted:
Risk
Blatant Scam - unverified results can never EVER be trusted..... anyone with decent results takes pride in making sure the account is verified - This is quite obviously fabricated.
HOLY GRAIL: Fundamental Analysis to chose your pairs/direction, Technical Entry/SL/TP for consistent Management of those decisions
*การใช้งานเชิงพาณิชย์และสแปมจะไม่ได้รับการยอมรับ และอาจส่งผลให้บัญชีถูกยกเลิก
เคล็ดลับ: การโพสต์รูปภาพ/youtube url จะฝังลงในโพสต์ของคุณโดยอัตโนมัติ!
เคล็ดลับ: พิมพ์เครื่องหมาย @ เพื่อป้อนชื่อผู้ใช้ที่เข้าร่วมการสนทนานี้โดยอัตโนมัติ