Advertisement
Discussion of the Forex Contest GDMFX Forex Contest
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 28, 2016
7 โพสต์
Feb 25, 2017 at 18:19
EA robot trading, ban
princeofpipfx@
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 29, 2016
5 โพสต์
Feb 25, 2017 at 18:20
Weinstein posted:Croco_Dile posted:Weinstein posted:
IP tracking.
Gamblers in casino.
Trading is not a zero sum game.
There is no risk.
Weinstein, you really need a good avatar !
Don't be faceless.....
Good luck in trading ! Your live account looks really good ! 😎
Indeed.
Thank you!
IP tracking. - agree, although there are ways to mask it.
Gamblers in casino - agree, if you are not a professional card counter or poker player
Trading is not a zero sum game - agree, nothing to dispute
There is no risk. - Seriously? Even a decision to turn on your PC has risks of you getting electrocuted, just that the risk is so small, your gains of having it turned on to allow you to utilise it outweighs that of you dying from electrocution. Cannot see how any serious trader would agree to this statement.
Anyway it seems we are all wasting out time on what he does rather than improving ourselves. And he enjoys trolling every single rational person here. Probably really better to just mind our own trading haha.
Have fun!
Never resist the markets
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 15, 2017
1 โพสต์
Feb 25, 2017 at 18:27
Dear admin
do u like tell me in demo contest why day by day commision are increased ???
do u like tell me in demo contest why day by day commision are increased ???
Feb 25, 2017 at 18:33
Just another question, one that might seem a bit 'unorthodox':
Is it within the rules to train a bunch of really trainable pigeons to trade on the contestant's behalf? There have been experiments where they can be trained to detect cancer cells visually with high accuracy and so hypothetically there's no reason why they can't also detect and classify market behavior and in effect make trading decisions (in exchange for food).
I suppose this would be considered as another form of automation or cheating (not that I would try this personally) even though they are not actual EA's they would behave like bioloigical EA's with neural nets... it would probably mean the contestant would be disqualified because they are not the ones doing the trades (so the pigeons should get the reward).
I'm baffled by how the current trading results so far have reached well over +1000% ROI. Either some people here are finding ways to apply the "law of very large numbers" which is legally dubious (in the context of contest rules) or they are genuinely a rare few who could be classified as "supertraders".
Is it within the rules to train a bunch of really trainable pigeons to trade on the contestant's behalf? There have been experiments where they can be trained to detect cancer cells visually with high accuracy and so hypothetically there's no reason why they can't also detect and classify market behavior and in effect make trading decisions (in exchange for food).
I suppose this would be considered as another form of automation or cheating (not that I would try this personally) even though they are not actual EA's they would behave like bioloigical EA's with neural nets... it would probably mean the contestant would be disqualified because they are not the ones doing the trades (so the pigeons should get the reward).
I'm baffled by how the current trading results so far have reached well over +1000% ROI. Either some people here are finding ways to apply the "law of very large numbers" which is legally dubious (in the context of contest rules) or they are genuinely a rare few who could be classified as "supertraders".
- TimeWarp to 2030 AD -
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Oct 28, 2015
52 โพสต์
Feb 25, 2017 at 18:35
darn! there are serious traders in here walala
Prayer is the True Power that controls the World.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Oct 28, 2015
52 โพสต์
Feb 25, 2017 at 18:35
I just hope the top 10 will maintain till the end. 😎
Prayer is the True Power that controls the World.
Feb 26, 2017 at 06:34
(แก้ไขแล้ว Feb 26, 2017 at 06:38)
Just how a lot of Contestants managed over 1000% profits in just a couple weeks is really beyond me!.....Are you guys for real?...if so, I sure would like to try out your "system" on a real live trading account and see whether it works the same way :)
I am barely managing 10% profits and is, of course, way, way, way behind the top leaders😕
I am barely managing 10% profits and is, of course, way, way, way behind the top leaders😕
Feb 26, 2017 at 06:40
Anyway it seems we are all wasting out time on what he does rather than improving ourselves. And he enjoys trolling every single rational person here. Probably really better to just mind our own trading haha.
Have fun!
His thinking and sharing level would never match that of an average trader here.. let alone new traders..
Help the Poor!
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 08, 2016
276 โพสต์
Feb 26, 2017 at 06:50
jsoh85 posted:
Anyway it seems we are all wasting out time on what he does rather than improving ourselves. And he enjoys trolling every single rational person here. Probably really better to just mind our own trading haha.
Have fun!
We all do improve. Even by participation in a stupid Demo contest.... LOL
Also we all are having fun.
Isn't it real fun to se those up and downs ?!
😇
Complexity is expensive, inefficient, and ineffective > Crocodile trading
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 08, 2016
276 โพสต์
Feb 26, 2017 at 06:51
vocasla posted:
Just another question, one that might seem a bit 'unorthodox':
Is it within the rules to train a bunch of really trainable pigeons to trade on the contestant's behalf? There have been experiments where they can be trained to detect cancer cells visually with high accuracy and so hypothetically there's no reason why they can't also detect and classify market behavior and in effect make trading decisions (in exchange for food).
I suppose this would be considered as another form of automation or cheating (not that I would try this personally) even though they are not actual EA's they would behave like bioloigical EA's with neural nets... it would probably mean the contestant would be disqualified because they are not the ones doing the trades (so the pigeons should get the reward).
The pigeons will be disqualified using a shotgun by the broker. 😈 😈 😡
LOL
Complexity is expensive, inefficient, and ineffective > Crocodile trading
Feb 26, 2017 at 06:54
Boferer posted:
Weinstein, please, could you answer one question?
Why do you even bother to trade in a contest with a 4000 USD prize when you have over 5000 % return on your real portfolio?
Plus, where in the screenshow can we see that its actually a real account and not a fake one?
thaTS A SILLY QUESTION, HE LIKES TO COMPETE, AND HE LIKES TO WIN, NOW ASK HIM A REAL ONE EH?
You can always get back in!
Feb 26, 2017 at 06:55
vocasla posted:
Just another question, one that might seem a bit 'unorthodox':
Is it within the rules to train a bunch of really trainable pigeons to trade on the contestant's behalf? There have been experiments where they can be trained to detect cancer cells visually with high accuracy and so hypothetically there's no reason why they can't also detect and classify market behavior and in effect make trading decisions (in exchange for food).
I suppose this would be considered as another form of automation or cheating (not that I would try this personally) even though they are not actual EA's they would behave like bioloigical EA's with neural nets... it would probably mean the contestant would be disqualified because they are not the ones doing the trades (so the pigeons should get the reward).
I'm baffled by how the current trading results so far have reached well over +1000% ROI. Either some people here are finding ways to apply the "law of very large numbers" which is legally dubious (in the context of contest rules) or they are genuinely a rare few who could be classified as "supertraders".
bWHAHAHA THE TRADES ARE PUBLIC! I entered late and thought I was doing ok, until I saw 1000% I only got like 7% a day two days trading int he contest, I guess I gotta step it up a notch?>
You can always get back in!
Feb 26, 2017 at 06:56
jsoh85 posted:Weinstein posted:Croco_Dile posted:Weinstein posted:
IP tracking.
Gamblers in casino.
Trading is not a zero sum game.
There is no risk.
Weinstein, you really need a good avatar !
Don't be faceless.....
Good luck in trading ! Your live account looks really good ! 😎
Indeed.
Thank you!
IP tracking. - agree, although there are ways to mask it.
Gamblers in casino - agree, if you are not a professional card counter or poker player
Trading is not a zero sum game - agree, nothing to dispute
There is no risk. - Seriously? Even a decision to turn on your PC has risks of you getting electrocuted, just that the risk is so small, your gains of having it turned on to allow you to utilise it outweighs that of you dying from electrocution. Cannot see how any serious trader would agree to this statement.
Anyway it seems we are all wasting out time on what he does rather than improving ourselves. And he enjoys trolling every single rational person here. Probably really better to just mind our own trading haha.
Have fun!
um clue: probably better to examine his trades and learn something?> also please dont look at mine Im a master marker maker and I am just getting warmed up, I rule the markets and dunno if I wanna show all you all that, the banksters may hunt me down
You can always get back in!
Feb 26, 2017 at 06:57
Boferer posted:
Weinstein, please, could you answer one question?
Why do you even bother to trade in a contest with a 4000 USD prize when you have over 5000 % return on your real portfolio?
Plus, where in the screenshow can we see that its actually a real account and not a fake one?
He broke his broker
Now they are broke
FInd another one
You can always get back in!
Feb 26, 2017 at 07:03
Just how a lot of Contestants managed over 1000% profits in just a couple weeks is really beyond me!.....Are you guys for real?...if so, I sure would like to try out your "system" on a real live trading account and see whether it works the same way :)
I am barely managing 10% profits and is, of course, way, way, way behind the top leaders :p
I am barely managing 10% profits and is, of course, way, way, way behind the top leaders :p
Feb 26, 2017 at 22:29
(แก้ไขแล้ว Feb 26, 2017 at 22:48)
jsoh85 posted:Weinstein posted:Croco_Dile posted:Weinstein posted:
IP tracking.
Gamblers in casino.
Trading is not a zero sum game.
There is no risk.
Weinstein, you really need a good avatar !
Don't be faceless.....
Good luck in trading ! Your live account looks really good ! 😎
Indeed.
Thank you!
IP tracking. - agree, although there are ways to mask it.
Gamblers in casino - agree, if you are not a professional card counter or poker player
Trading is not a zero sum game - agree, nothing to dispute
There is no risk. - Seriously? Even a decision to turn on your PC has risks of you getting electrocuted, just that the risk is so small, your gains of having it turned on to allow you to utilise it outweighs that of you dying from electrocution. Cannot see how any serious trader would agree to this statement.
Anyway it seems we are all wasting out time on what he does rather than improving ourselves. And he enjoys trolling every single rational person here. Probably really better to just mind our own trading haha.
Have fun!
Don't measure the detriment without considering the advantage.
Let's distinguish risk from VAR (value at risk).
Feb 26, 2017 at 22:31
Boferer posted:
Weinstein, please, could you answer one question?
Why do you even bother to trade in a contest with a 4000 USD prize when you have over 5000 % return on your real portfolio?
Plus, where in the screenshow can we see that its actually a real account and not a fake one?
First there are three questions.
I will choose one, I do not bother.
