เพื่อใช้การแชท โปรดเข้าสู่ระบบ
กลับไปที่รายชื่อ
Lithert
Sep 30 2013 at 13:41
14 โพสต์
Hello everyone, I wanted to pose a question to the attention of traders, but if brokers are regulated by the FSA (Financial Services Authority) why people choose non-regulated broker and then they go to complain everywhere who have lost their money, which the broker does not return the money or do not close positions in accordance with stop loss and take profit. Are really that stupid people to entrust their money to people who are advertising on the internet?

Thalantas
Sep 30 2013 at 14:32
192 โพสต์
Regulated or unregulated, I don't think it matters if the broker wants to hunt your SL, it will.

I only use regulated brokers and feel like I got 'hunted' more than once honestly.

A smooth sea never made a skillful sailor.
cubye1
Oct 01 2013 at 09:04
13 โพสต์
I think the minimum, traders shoud do is to avoid unregulated brokers, as eve so its open to misunderstandings. i prefere the USA regulated, even with all the limitations on my activity. 😉

not the system is importent but your experience to read the market and take the right decision to refuse enter a trade
Stanko777
Oct 01 2013 at 11:52
19 โพสต์
At least with regulated broker you have a chance to complain to the above institution. But it is not that useful. If you've been tricked for like a 100$, nobody will take you seriously. The only good thing about the regulated broker is that they can be forced to pay you money that you have on the account.

Danneskjold
Oct 01 2013 at 11:57
8 โพสต์
A lot of unregulated brokers offer attractive perks. I suppose a lot of it is due to people wanting the perks but not wanting to consider the risk. Which kinda means they aren't good traders, actually...

The other problem is that people 'feel' they've been cheated, but don't have any proof. It's just a lot better for their ego to say that they were cheated instead of realizing they didn't put the proper stops or make adequate risk assessment. Just because a broker isn't regulated it doesn't necessarily mean they are cheating: brokers often try to get some business before they go through the expense of registration.

Nil (Sleepless)
Oct 01 2013 at 14:01
16 โพสต์
Oh well, the greed will always be a reason for human stupidity. It is human nature! Another thing is that when will lose theyr money all you can do is show him why he lose.

Remind_later
Oct 07 2013 at 12:07
24 โพสต์
I think nowadays the regulated broker is not yet a 100% protection against the scammers. Brokers are looking for more and more ways ways to make profit. So what I would really concern about is the broker's reputation.

dvejn
Oct 07 2013 at 20:11
92 โพสต์
regulacion is bullshit. you paid regulation in spread. broker must paid! regulation = big spread. best spread offer have unregulated broker.

regulation not support small traders, meabe 50 000 usd +. but for small trader not have time.

97% traders problem is no broker problem. traders not read condition. open ecn account, here is slippage normal, and says scaaaaam, scaaaaam. many traders not understand how to work market.

only says: MM broker is bad, ecn is good . and ecn have slippage and is bad.....

next problem : trading in news, not close position in friday (gap kill account), bad mm, stoploss in support area............................... best of is this : 500 usd and buy 2 lot :-D

i need profit, trade in unregulated broker. i do not have problem. 99% brokers is ok.


Regulation IS ONLY MARKETING strategy big broker. this compeny paid every month big money for many page and forum.....example : every broker have regulation, you open in 0,5 spread or in 2 pip spread? 99,9% people open in 0,5 !!!!!!

many people is partner for this broker, this broker paid big money for this partner. and this people says- you need regulation broker, go here, 2 or 3 regulation. go go go stupid trader, i need money :-D you not need this compeny.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!USE BRAIN PEOPLEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! USE Mathematicians. ITS SIMPLE.

Best rebate for IC Markets 1,60 RTL+ armada markets 10% commision back + next 30 brokers company only in . Who will give you more?
FXdiversified
Oct 08 2013 at 06:25
30 โพสต์
I think the basic question is what is the regulation good for. I think it is necessary if the broker operates from countries with developed markets. From the customer point of view it acts like a two way insurance policy. First it should guarantee best execution practice. Second it enforces segregate accounts for customers and sometimes (might be always not sure here) the protection of customer funds up to a certain amount.

Everybody should be free to decide which 'insurance level' is the most appropriate as not all regulating institutions might have the same quality.

Well and it is definitely not for free (no insurance is) but unlike @dvejn I do not believe that non regulated brokers are somehow 'cheaper', but for sure they might have lower spreads and be more attractive for smaller accounts (sub $1000). It the last case most will burn their money anyway so there is no need for any fund protection.

And S/L hunting might be an other issue highly dependent on the broker business model and of course the S/L contingent to marketvolatility and traded asset.


Danneskjold
Oct 10 2013 at 12:28
8 โพสต์
Basically, brokers are going to function like any other business: if you want to develop a successful business, you need happy return customers. So any broker that's looking to stay in the market for the long term is going to have to maintain good business practices, because otherwise they will lose clients and they will gain a bad reputation that will prevent them from getting new clients.

Of course there are differences between how customer friendly each broker will be; but the basic rule is that scams don't last long.

โปรดเข้าสู่ระบบเพื่อแสดงความคิดเห็น