Is Algorithmic Trading Really Better Than Manual Trading?

Aug 21 at 12:04
129 การดู
10 Replies
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Apr 07, 2025   46 โพสต์
Aug 21 at 12:04

I’ve been reading a lot about algorithmic trading lately, and I’m curious about real experiences from traders here. Some say algorithms are the future of trading because they remove emotions and can execute faster than humans. Others argue that without a solid strategy, even the best code won’t help.


So my question is:For those who have tried algorithmic trading, did it actually give you a consistent edge over manual trading? Or is success still mainly about strategy, market knowledge, and risk management?

เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 28, 2025   8 โพสต์
Aug 21 at 12:47

Algorithmic trading can be better than manual trading in some ways, but not always. Algorithms follow rules and don’t panic when the market goes up or down. Humans often make emotional decisions, like closing trades too early out of fear or holding on too long out of greed. An algorithm can scan lots of markets and place trades in a split second, something a person simply can’t do. This gives it an edge, especially in fast-moving markets.

เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jun 10, 2025   5 โพสต์
Aug 22 at 05:28 (แก้ไขแล้ว Aug 22 at 05:28)

Definitely, if you check my strat, even if I know all the entries it would be extremely exhausting recalculate the position sizes, and entering the orders. 


Let data guide the trade, not emotion.
forex_trader_4148657
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ May 26, 2025   10 โพสต์
Aug 22 at 08:05

100%

forex_trader_3826673
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 25, 2024   15 โพสต์
Aug 22 at 09:16

I think they complement each other. If you’re not already a good discretionary trader, how would you know what to code in the first place? An algorithm on its own doesn’t magically create an edge — it just automates the edge you’ve already developed through experience.


So in my view, success still starts with strategy, risk management, and market understanding. Once those foundations are in place, algorithmic trading makes the work easier: it removes emotional bias, ensures consistency, and allows you to scale or test strategies more efficiently.

เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ May 24, 2020   1 โพสต์
Aug 31 at 08:28

It can be helpful but it can not fully replace human experience. In my experience mixed trading is the most profitable, by far. I use algorithms for analysis and trade manually.

เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 18, 2019   99 โพสต์
Aug 31 at 10:15

Algorithmic trading can definitely give an edge, especially in consistency and speed. I’ve been running my own EA trading XAUUSD for over 3.5 years, and it’s achieved 911% overall gain so far. That kind of disciplined, emotion-free execution would be extremely hard to match consistently as a human.


That said, success still hinges on a solid strategy, proper risk management, and market understanding. Algorithms don’t replace the need for a well-tested approach—they just allow you to apply it reliably and at scale. My experience shows that combining careful strategy development with algo execution is where the real advantage lies.

Adapt, analyze, and achieve — one trade at a time.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 26, 2015   37 โพสต์
Sep 05 at 20:20
Mdraghib posted:

I’ve been reading a lot about algorithmic trading lately, and I’m curious about real experiences from traders here. Some say algorithms are the future of trading because they remove emotions and can execute faster than humans. Others argue that without a solid strategy, even the best code won’t help.


So my question is:For those who have tried algorithmic trading, did it actually give you a consistent edge over manual trading? Or is success still mainly about strategy, market knowledge, and risk management?


First of all, any trading is algorithmic. You probably meant automatic trading. Yes, it is much better than manual trading. I have no tiny doubt.

"Markets are constantly in a state of uncertainty and flux and money is made by discounting the obvious and betting on the unexpected" - George Soros
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 26, 2015   37 โพสต์
Sep 05 at 20:21
CitionFund posted:

It can be helpful but it can not fully replace human experience. In my experience mixed trading is the most profitable, by far. I use algorithms for analysis and trade manually.


Why software can't replace your trading if it already replaced your analysis? It cannot click the "trade" button for you?  

"Markets are constantly in a state of uncertainty and flux and money is made by discounting the obvious and betting on the unexpected" - George Soros
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jun 11, 2025   3 โพสต์
Sep 09 at 18:40

I trust manual trading, strategy, risks - it's all exciting.

เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jun 10, 2025   29 โพสต์
Sep 12 at 08:58

Guys, how are you handling regime shifts - volatility filters, walk-forward validation, and periodic re-optimization, or do you run stable parameters with risk-parity sizing?

You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*การใช้งานเชิงพาณิชย์และสแปมจะไม่ได้รับการยอมรับ และอาจส่งผลให้บัญชีถูกยกเลิก
เคล็ดลับ: การโพสต์รูปภาพ/youtube url จะฝังลงในโพสต์ของคุณโดยอัตโนมัติ!
เคล็ดลับ: พิมพ์เครื่องหมาย @ เพื่อป้อนชื่อผู้ใช้ที่เข้าร่วมการสนทนานี้โดยอัตโนมัติ