Forex Growth Bot
| กำไร : | +2644.71% |
| ขาดทุนสะสม | 94.46% |
| pips: | 8075.5 |
| การเทรด | 2881 |
| ได้กำไร : |
|
| ขาดทุน : |
|
| ประเภท : | จริง |
| เลเวอเรจ: | 1:200 |
| การเทรด : | อัตโนมัติ |
Forex Growth Bot การสนทนา
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 22, 2012
2 โพสต์
Apr 25, 2014 at 18:05
stevetrade posted:
This is an interesting discussion. I still have the 10 year backtest in my strategic history and while the EA in backtest never suffered six losing months in a row before there are plenty of times early on where it lost 3 months in a row and then not long after did so again. Analysing the backtest history for a period from 1999 - 2001 shows that the EA performed far worse overall than it has here. You can see a snapshot of this attached.
Whether the EA will ever perform again remains to be seen. The main question to ask is whether you are prepared to accept the chance of sideways movement for years at a time. I think the key thing to learn here is to take a good hard look at the backtest data you generate and ask whether you are happy with every period of trading history that the backtest shows you, if similar patterns where to occur again.
I for one have moved on from using this EA.
Best regards Steve
most of the EAs are like this ... many of are bullshits ..
forex_trader_167763
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 16, 2013
7 โพสต์
May 01, 2014 at 05:09
this bot works based on volatility. EURUSD at its lowest volatility since released in 2000. check monthly volatility there free web pages or basicly apply ATR1 on weekly ckart.
EURUSD RIP => FGB RIP
EURUSD RIP => FGB RIP
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ May 08, 2014
49 โพสต์
May 09, 2014 at 07:24
Forex Growth Bot really went to the wayside. It's such a shame.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jun 22, 2014
423 โพสต์
Jul 26, 2014 at 09:57
keltnerpro posted:
Forex Growth Bot really went to the wayside. It's such a shame.
what was the reason for its failure?
forex_trader_198908
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 10, 2014
4 โพสต์
Aug 14, 2014 at 06:27
It is proposed to check my profile, drawdown of 5-6% can not be 90% ....
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 09, 2014
80 โพสต์
Aug 14, 2014 at 18:58
In my experience is better choose stability and consistent profits more than very volatile systems.
forex_trader_198908
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 10, 2014
4 โพสต์
Aug 18, 2014 at 10:06
How drawdown of 90% is stable for you, then go to the doctor Hazard
forex_trader_198908
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 10, 2014
4 โพสต์
Sep 11, 2014 at 14:11
jaja
Nov 19, 2014 at 17:23
Darn, I was hoping that this EA would completely bite the dirt.
94% DD on April 28 was so very close falling off the ledge.
It looks like it was hanging on by a finger nail and now, over the last few months, it has managed to put on at least two more wobbly fingers.
finger = 10%
Ref DD tab: 94% DD (April28) to the current 73% DD (Nov19)
94% DD on April 28 was so very close falling off the ledge.
It looks like it was hanging on by a finger nail and now, over the last few months, it has managed to put on at least two more wobbly fingers.
finger = 10%
Ref DD tab: 94% DD (April28) to the current 73% DD (Nov19)
forex_trader_198908
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 10, 2014
4 โพสต์
Nov 26, 2014 at 09:00
😄
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 19, 2015
61 โพสต์
Feb 19, 2015 at 09:55
hi folks how can be a member and see the open trades here :)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 27, 2015
5 โพสต์
Mar 12, 2015 at 08:11
What is this shitty account and why so many people are following it?
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 19, 2015
61 โพสต์
May 09, 2015 at 11:33
Nice informations losing feels beautiful with forex growth
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 05, 2011
305 โพสต์
May 09, 2015 at 11:57
tigpips posted:
seems pretty good thus far
Are you for real? 94% drawdown and it looks pretty good???
forex_trader_41933
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 16, 2011
38 โพสต์
May 09, 2015 at 16:13
He risked with a manual MM to recover the loosing strikes..... Heart attack was not in place cause he put only 250 USD in the account!
Forex Growth was the first experimetal bot to show that trading wit EA is possible... But is too risky...
Forex Growth was the first experimetal bot to show that trading wit EA is possible... But is too risky...
