FxPapa Expert Advisor (โดย FxPapa)
ผู้ใช้ได้ลบระบบนี้
Edit Your Comment
FxPapa Expert Advisor การสนทนา
May 22, 2012 at 11:46
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Nov 26, 2011
136 โพสต์
mckarlos posted:
something I can not understand. When we met the big drawdown your Lots were just 0.12, so you haven´t lost so much mony. Then you wrote it is because of your broker. But right after this everything is ok und the lotsize is as normal.? very strange.
Please read the discussion board. I've explained it.
May 24, 2012 at 14:01
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 23, 2011
78 โพสต์
Hi FxPapa,
It would be great if one of your future versions could include risk related to period of time and day so that it allowed us to reduce or increase risk on certain days and certain periods of time. Fx Papa goes very well on Wednesdays and afternoons (12-17:30h your EA time). It's not very good on Tuesdays. We should find a way to make it a little more profitable because if it loses 5 times in the year (same risk along the year) no profit will come. If it loses more than 5, it will end the 12-month period in loss. I think setting the risk based on parts of the day and days might improve it a llittle.
It would be great if one of your future versions could include risk related to period of time and day so that it allowed us to reduce or increase risk on certain days and certain periods of time. Fx Papa goes very well on Wednesdays and afternoons (12-17:30h your EA time). It's not very good on Tuesdays. We should find a way to make it a little more profitable because if it loses 5 times in the year (same risk along the year) no profit will come. If it loses more than 5, it will end the 12-month period in loss. I think setting the risk based on parts of the day and days might improve it a llittle.
May 29, 2012 at 05:11
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Nov 26, 2011
136 โพสต์
therebox posted:
Sorry - correction related to my calculations above - even if the EA loses once every 2 months (losing 6 times in the year), it probably would end the year profitably.
Thanks for your notice. We try our best to improve the results.
May 29, 2012 at 05:21
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 18, 2012
69 โพสต์
therebox posted:
Sorry - correction related to my calculations above - even if the EA loses once every 2 months (losing 6 times in the year), it probably would end the year profitably.
yes yes, u r right, it will be too profitable, if you will decrease the lot size at the time of drawdown just like fxpapa did in the recent drawdown. HA HA HA HA 😇😇😇😇😇😇
Jun 05, 2012 at 03:26
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 30, 2011
72 โพสต์
Hi FxPapa,
I think your results are impressive and I am considering joining. I have one question for you first: have you analyzed your floating drawdown for your 1-3 trade baskets? Before your -218 pips loss on May 16, your worst previous drawdown was -124 pips on Feb 7, which came back to profit. But the worst floating DD besides that has been -35 pips on Jan 9. Correct me if I'm wrong - I'm just going off myfxbook data here. Have you considered reducing the -220 collective SL to say -40 pips? If I'm correct, a -40 pip SL would have you at +140 pips compared to now. I think you open up to 3 trades 60 pips apart, right? Maybe those could be closer together and/or reduced to 2 (or just 1). Correct my thinking if I'm missing something here. Great system as is - just wondering if risk management can be improved given the trade history thus far. Thanks.
I think your results are impressive and I am considering joining. I have one question for you first: have you analyzed your floating drawdown for your 1-3 trade baskets? Before your -218 pips loss on May 16, your worst previous drawdown was -124 pips on Feb 7, which came back to profit. But the worst floating DD besides that has been -35 pips on Jan 9. Correct me if I'm wrong - I'm just going off myfxbook data here. Have you considered reducing the -220 collective SL to say -40 pips? If I'm correct, a -40 pip SL would have you at +140 pips compared to now. I think you open up to 3 trades 60 pips apart, right? Maybe those could be closer together and/or reduced to 2 (or just 1). Correct my thinking if I'm missing something here. Great system as is - just wondering if risk management can be improved given the trade history thus far. Thanks.
Jun 05, 2012 at 19:43
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 23, 2011
78 โพสต์
gwringh,
What you wrote is wrong. There were at least 60 pips in DD (2 trades open same time) 12 times on the following days since the beginning of the year:
- today (06.05)
- 05.16 - the loss
- 04.18
- 04.13
- 04.11
- 03.25
- 03.19
- 03.12
- 03.07
- 02.07 (3 trades)
- 01.09
- 01.04
Anyway it's a good system, at least it seems to me. If you want to reduce 220 pips to lose less, something close to 100 (100+40 in the 2nd trade) might be a good idea, but I'm not sure. But not 35.
What you wrote is wrong. There were at least 60 pips in DD (2 trades open same time) 12 times on the following days since the beginning of the year:
- today (06.05)
- 05.16 - the loss
- 04.18
- 04.13
- 04.11
- 03.25
- 03.19
- 03.12
- 03.07
- 02.07 (3 trades)
- 01.09
- 01.04
Anyway it's a good system, at least it seems to me. If you want to reduce 220 pips to lose less, something close to 100 (100+40 in the 2nd trade) might be a good idea, but I'm not sure. But not 35.
Jun 05, 2012 at 20:00
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 30, 2011
72 โพสต์
Yeah, I thought that looked wrong. I guess the myfxbook Drawdown tab does not work the way I would like it to (which would be to show the maximum floating drawdown each day for all open trades - and per trade would be awesome - like segmented bars). As it stands, I'm not sure what they're showing. I think their equity graphs must be wrong as well.
Jun 06, 2012 at 01:48
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Nov 26, 2011
136 โพสต์
gwrigh posted:
Hi FxPapa,
I think your results are impressive and I am considering joining. I have one question for you first: have you analyzed your floating drawdown for your 1-3 trade baskets? Before your -218 pips loss on May 16, your worst previous drawdown was -124 pips on Feb 7, which came back to profit. But the worst floating DD besides that has been -35 pips on Jan 9. Correct me if I'm wrong - I'm just going off myfxbook data here. Have you considered reducing the -220 collective SL to say -40 pips? If I'm correct, a -40 pip SL would have you at +140 pips compared to now. I think you open up to 3 trades 60 pips apart, right? Maybe those could be closer together and/or reduced to 2 (or just 1). Correct my thinking if I'm missing something here. Great system as is - just wondering if risk management can be improved given the trade history thus far. Thanks.
Hi
Thanks for your suggestion. We try to find the best optimization.
Regards
Jun 12, 2012 at 06:39
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Nov 26, 2011
136 โพสต์
ragency posted:
FxPapa,
While my demo account picked up the EURUSD (+8.8 pips) today, my live account did not.
The EA display messages were correct on both when I checked ...
Do you have any recommendations?
Hi
This may happens sometimes. The reason is different between brokers' price and spread.
Regards
Jun 12, 2012 at 14:33
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 29, 2010
178 โพสต์
u need an option for clients to switch off gbpusd trades. gbpusd seems to be your weakest pair, and biggest loss too in pips. can you implement that in your next updated. as well as a safety net SL incase our vps or your server disconnects. it has happened to me before with other EAs and had a margin call before there wasnt any visible stop loss even though there was an internal sl.
Get Rich or Die Trying
Jun 12, 2012 at 15:46
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 23, 2011
78 โพสต์
FxPapa and ragency,
In my view, Fxpapa server has a few problems. I'll explain why I think so. I have 2 EAs running in the same broker and same VPS, with different risks, both real accounts. Today 1 account traded twice. The other account trade once. The account that traded once had a trade (risk 25) with 3% profit. The other account (same trade, risk 10) made less than 0.5%. From time to time I see the EA active in one MT and not active in the other MT. So unless a better explanation is presented, the only one I see for this is the problem is in the FxPapa server.
In my view, Fxpapa server has a few problems. I'll explain why I think so. I have 2 EAs running in the same broker and same VPS, with different risks, both real accounts. Today 1 account traded twice. The other account trade once. The account that traded once had a trade (risk 25) with 3% profit. The other account (same trade, risk 10) made less than 0.5%. From time to time I see the EA active in one MT and not active in the other MT. So unless a better explanation is presented, the only one I see for this is the problem is in the FxPapa server.

*การใช้งานเชิงพาณิชย์และสแปมจะไม่ได้รับการยอมรับ และอาจส่งผลให้บัญชีถูกยกเลิก
เคล็ดลับ: การโพสต์รูปภาพ/youtube url จะฝังลงในโพสต์ของคุณโดยอัตโนมัติ!
เคล็ดลับ: พิมพ์เครื่องหมาย @ เพื่อป้อนชื่อผู้ใช้ที่เข้าร่วมการสนทนานี้โดยอัตโนมัติ