HAMSTER TURBO (โดย EleniAnna Branou )
ผู้ใช้ได้ลบระบบนี้
eleanna74 posted:
Hello Luka, I have subscribers that copy with a minimal 2-4 points slippage and others that have around 10 points slippage. I would say that anything below 8-10 points its quite acceptable under the circumstances.
I am not sure what do you mean by “point”? Percentage point or 0.1 pips?
Hi eleni - if you can check the market depth before you employ the action - you should be able to gage a reasonable expectation of what will happen with your order. Also keeping a log of how much your signal affects the market price when you open and close and at what time of day would also be helpful.
Look at todays trade for example - your sell position moved the price down 3.5pips @ 0200, then up 2.8 pips when you closed at 0250.
Your signal today pushed prices an avg of more than 3 pips. Ive seen it do more than this also - sometimes more than 5 pips...
Why dont you try an experiment - is there a way to get a poll going whereby the investors consent to the experiment? The most we are risking is perhaps a pip or 2 of slippage... which is usual for many of us anyway!
The first positions will close with more profit - the second position not so much - but even if the second position closes at break even - we still have extra pips on the first position...
Look at todays trade for example - your sell position moved the price down 3.5pips @ 0200, then up 2.8 pips when you closed at 0250.
Your signal today pushed prices an avg of more than 3 pips. Ive seen it do more than this also - sometimes more than 5 pips...
Why dont you try an experiment - is there a way to get a poll going whereby the investors consent to the experiment? The most we are risking is perhaps a pip or 2 of slippage... which is usual for many of us anyway!
The first positions will close with more profit - the second position not so much - but even if the second position closes at break even - we still have extra pips on the first position...
EleniAnna Branou
(eleanna74)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 29, 2017
589 โพสต์
Feb 26 2019 at 10:38
Hello Luka, 1 pip is 10 points and 1 point is 0.1 pips.
EleniAnna Branou
(eleanna74)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 29, 2017
589 โพสต์
Feb 26 2019 at 10:40
Hello groper, you are thinking only of yourself (if you are lucky to be on those who copy well and fast), I have to think about 2500 subscribers, before I change anything in my strategy. This is not doable.
EleniAnna Branou
(eleanna74)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 29, 2017
589 โพสต์
Feb 26 2019 at 10:41
I am not causing these spikes with my trades only, a lot of other trades and fund managers have grasped the strategy and imitate, so the outcome is not only ours.
FxGodx posted:
I would say 1000$
250$ for signal trade
750$ capital
and 40x12=480$ for signal
and VPS is for like 50$ year
But you will make more in year than these expenses
So this program isn’t automated? I assumed if I saw it on signalstart that it would work itself? Why would anyone need a VPS after that? Or is there a program you can rent and you have to run it on your own?
I’m confused.
EleniAnna Branou
(eleanna74)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 29, 2017
589 โพสต์
Feb 26 2019 at 18:51
With SignalStart you don't need a VPS.
thedlewis posted:
So this program isn’t automated? I assumed if I saw it on signalstart that it would work itself? Why would anyone need a VPS after that? Or is there a program you can rent and you have to run it on your own?
I’m confused.
If you use signalstart then you don't need VPS, everything is automated. If you want to have money management automated as well, use HAMSTER INFINITY, just put $1000 and you don't have to do anything.
EleniAnna Branou
(eleanna74)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 29, 2017
589 โพสต์
Feb 27 2019 at 07:21
Dear HAMSTER TURBO subscribers, today we all encountered a larger than usual slippage during the closure of our trades. Its the first time that I didn't get the targeted pips myself, resulting to 30 points profit, instead of the 50 I was aiming for. I can see from your feedback that some of you suffered a larger slippage having much smaller profit or in some cases loss, but I would to like to remain calm as this seems to be a one off case. In the last few days the slippage problem was improving for the majority of my subscribers, as I was getting encouraging feedback after the change in their servers. So, please don't jump into conclusions over one problematic day. Also have in mind that right now we would have been in about 25% drawdown if we hadn't close our trades, so maybe it was all for the best.
Thank you very much for your trust and support!
Eleni Anna Branou
Thank you very much for your trust and support!
Eleni Anna Branou
eleanna74 posted:
With SignalStart you don't need a VPS.
What is the option where I need the VPS? Send me a PM if you'd like to.
EleniAnna Branou
(eleanna74)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 29, 2017
589 โพสต์
Feb 27 2019 at 07:29
In MQL5 you need a VPS in order to copy, in SignalStart you don't, they use their own API.
I suffered -1.8% loss today, due to the slippage. It doesn't happen often luckely.
EleniAnna Branou
(eleanna74)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 29, 2017
589 โพสต์
Feb 27 2019 at 08:24
Yes, I know, today was an exceptional day.
Hi all,
I also observed a huge slippage today. My second position closed at 1.13878 while Eleni's closed 1.13923.
Luckily I didn't experience any physical loss, I'm still in the observing phase, I am using demo account at Live15 with 10k$ virtual money for a bit more than a week now.
Since just yesterday I activated MQL5 VPS at my demo account I have a general question:
Eleni, anybody,
what is actually more important? have VPS the same as you (MQL5 virtual VPS), or that I have VPS closer to my broker (IC Markets) (e.g. ICMarkets offer VPS with <0.5ms latency, while MQL5 has about 9ms latency to ICMarkets).
My understanding of trade copying is as follows:
<source/initiating action> <receiver>
VPS of signal provider <----------------> VPS of subscriber
| |
| |
Signal provider's broker Broker of subscriber
I hope my 'drawing' is understandable :-)
I mean that the source is actually the VPS of signal provider (with running EA or manual trading initiated there). From there it is transferred to the broker of signal's provider and at the same time (or just afterwards), the signal is transferred FROM THE signal provider's VPS to VPSs of subscribers from where the signal is transferred then to the respective brokers. There is NO DIRECT CONNECTION between signal provider's broker and subscriber's broker.
is my understanding correct?
if yes it would mean that most important is the low latency between both VPSs. Having the same broker as signal provider is only of second importance as long as connection between the VPS of subscriber to his broker has ultra low latency.
if I'm wrong please explain me how it works in practice and where which action is initiated so that I can make an as good as possible setup to minimize slippage (of course it's clear to me that I cannot avoid it completely, but I want to make it as good as it gets).
thanks in advance for helping me understanding that.
I also observed a huge slippage today. My second position closed at 1.13878 while Eleni's closed 1.13923.
Luckily I didn't experience any physical loss, I'm still in the observing phase, I am using demo account at Live15 with 10k$ virtual money for a bit more than a week now.
Since just yesterday I activated MQL5 VPS at my demo account I have a general question:
Eleni, anybody,
what is actually more important? have VPS the same as you (MQL5 virtual VPS), or that I have VPS closer to my broker (IC Markets) (e.g. ICMarkets offer VPS with <0.5ms latency, while MQL5 has about 9ms latency to ICMarkets).
My understanding of trade copying is as follows:
<source/initiating action> <receiver>
VPS of signal provider <----------------> VPS of subscriber
| |
| |
Signal provider's broker Broker of subscriber
I hope my 'drawing' is understandable :-)
I mean that the source is actually the VPS of signal provider (with running EA or manual trading initiated there). From there it is transferred to the broker of signal's provider and at the same time (or just afterwards), the signal is transferred FROM THE signal provider's VPS to VPSs of subscribers from where the signal is transferred then to the respective brokers. There is NO DIRECT CONNECTION between signal provider's broker and subscriber's broker.
is my understanding correct?
if yes it would mean that most important is the low latency between both VPSs. Having the same broker as signal provider is only of second importance as long as connection between the VPS of subscriber to his broker has ultra low latency.
if I'm wrong please explain me how it works in practice and where which action is initiated so that I can make an as good as possible setup to minimize slippage (of course it's clear to me that I cannot avoid it completely, but I want to make it as good as it gets).
thanks in advance for helping me understanding that.
sorry, my 'drawing' got broken, I attached a picture, how it supposed to look like.
EleniAnna Branou
(eleanna74)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 29, 2017
589 โพสต์
Feb 27 2019 at 12:31
Dear HAMSTER TURBO subscribers, slippage is not my fault or your fault, its a technical problem caused by the low liquidity in the night market and the size of orders that reach the market at the same time. I've contacted ICMarkets and other brokers, to ask for their advice and help in that situation, but from their feedback I realize that there is not much they can do, since the liquidity providers are not adapting their limits or behaviour in the market easily. So, the best we can all do is to continue spreading over more ICMarkets (and other brokers) servers in order to reduce the workload and increase the execution speed of our trades.
Thank you very much for your understanding!
Eleni Anna Branou
Thank you very much for your understanding!
Eleni Anna Branou
hey Elena ,you must that slippage triple on wednesday ,should stop trading on that day...simple suggestion
EleniAnna Branou
(eleanna74)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 29, 2017
589 โพสต์
Feb 27 2019 at 16:40
What slippage triple?
Do you mean triple swap?
This has nothing to do with last night's problem.
Do you mean triple swap?
This has nothing to do with last night's problem.
EleniAnna Branou
(eleanna74)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 29, 2017
589 โพสต์
Feb 28 2019 at 09:45
Dear HAMSTER TURBO subscribers, our trading week ends here, because there is an important speech of FED's Powell right into our trading session tonight and we will not take any unecessary risks. So, now its time for our weekly money management arrangements, unless you withdraw your profits daily, according to my second strategy. I 've divided the sum of signal and back up funds in 4 parts and trading will resume next week with the new 1/4 of the entire capital. Please put some profits safely in your back up accounts, wallets or bank accounts and never risk your entire available capital in my signal!
Thank you very much for your trust and support!
Eleni Anna Branou
Thank you very much for your trust and support!
Eleni Anna Branou