เพื่อใช้การแชท โปรดเข้าสู่ระบบ
กลับไปที่รายชื่อ

Pureprofitfx (โดย Pureprofitfx )

ผู้ใช้ได้ลบระบบนี้

Pureprofitfx การสนทนา

FxMasterGuru (FxMasterGuru)
Jun 23 2014 at 07:52
1608 โพสต์
'Our strategy is based on money management and pull backs. See the history and you will understand. We a have maximum 20% risk from our balance.' (copied from your Bio)

The strategy's max. DD was -27% over the past 7 months.

Apparently the stated -20% max. risk has has been already exceeded.

It is time to update the Bio...

P.S. A helpful hint: -27% DD is way beyond any serious investor's risk tolerance.
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
KOMAN
Jun 23 2014 at 09:42
34 โพสต์
FxMasterGuru posted:
'Our strategy is based on money management and pull backs. See the history and you will understand. We a have maximum 20% risk from our balance.' (copied from your Bio)

The strategy's max. DD was -27% over the past 7 months.

Apparently the stated -20% max. risk has has been already exceeded.

It is time to update the Bio...

P.S. A helpful hint: -27% DD is way beyond any serious investor's risk tolerance.

Buy smaller than the master account and will reduce the DD items.
It seems a serious system.
Gabriel Urse
Pureprofitfx
Jun 23 2014 at 10:05
38 โพสต์
Yes, it has been a mistake and a big one, because of the internet connection and automation which did not had a parameter set, but with all this mistake the max DD was 27%.
The mistake can not be repeated and the recent past has proved that.
Thanks for the remarks
Gabriel Urse
Pureprofitfx
Jun 23 2014 at 10:05
38 โพสต์
And pay attention, the 27% was not lost, that was the equity or the default on the move.
FxMasterGuru (FxMasterGuru)
Jun 23 2014 at 10:12
1608 โพสต์
PureProfitNoRisk posted:
Yes, it has been a mistake and a big one, because of the internet connection and automation which did not had a parameter set, but with all this mistake the max DD was 27%.
The mistake can not be repeated and the recent past has proved that.
Thanks for the remarks

Sounds like a reasonable explanation. I just wonder why don't you use a reliable VPS service where losing internet connection cannot be an issue?
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
KOMAN
Jun 23 2014 at 10:13
34 โพสต์
PureProfitNoRisk posted:
And pay attention, the 27% was not lost, that was the equity or the default on the move.

Thanks for participating.
Congratulations on a great job
Gabriel Urse
Pureprofitfx
Jun 23 2014 at 10:31
38 โพสต์
Sounds like a reasonable explanation. I just wonder why don't you use a reliable VPS service where losing internet connection cannot be an issue?
Because I do have a good internet connection, the only way it disconnects right now is in weekends, when I shut down the PC.
Gabriel Urse
Pureprofitfx
Jul 07 2014 at 13:57
38 โพสต์
Approx. 20% per month,is it suitable for you to pay a signal provider to do so for you?
Recommended balance minimum 1000 USD.
Check me out!😄
Gabriel Urse
Pureprofitfx
Jul 12 2014 at 13:29
38 โพสต์
I have experienced many trading strategies during years of trading for brokers, banks and investment funds.

If you want a steady and reliable one, watch my strategy!

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/PureProfitNoRisk/pureprofitnorisk/942758

It is based on money management with the emotional control included.

I have discovered the only reliable strategies ar those based on good money management.

Shortly, if you have a dumb strategy and you know a simple math and used all the time( emotional management comes in place here) you will make money!
Gary Sharp myfxpt com
myfxpt
Jul 12 2014 at 23:20
345 โพสต์
PureProfitNoRisk posted:
I have experienced many trading strategies during years of trading for brokers, banks and investment funds.

If you want a steady and reliable one, watch my strategy!

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/PureProfitNoRisk/pureprofitnorisk/942758

It is based on money management with the emotional control included.

I have discovered the only reliable strategies ar those based on good money management.

Shortly, if you have a dumb strategy and you know a simple math and used all the time( emotional management comes in place here) you will make money!

I absolutely agree with this. Good money management and a below average trading strategy will almost always out-perform a good trading strategy with poor money management. 😎
goode
Jul 29 2014 at 14:33
220 โพสต์
now i'm very very worry about the eurusd will up?

ไฟล์แนบ :

Gabriel Urse
Pureprofitfx
Jul 30 2014 at 06:46
38 โพสต์
I've always been patient about this. I know how it is, I have my own money in stake.
Clopma
Jul 30 2014 at 16:32
81 โพสต์
It will be a disaster for those who do not have hedging privileges with their broker. That is the only way the account can safely be salvaged given the current entrenchment (DD).
Viktory (VictorTous)
Jul 30 2014 at 16:37
107 โพสต์
@Clopma:
It is not the job of the trader/signal provider, to look after those details. It is a job for the subscriber 😉

Clopma posted:
It will be a disaster for those who do not have hedging privileges with their broker. That is the only way the account can safely be salvaged given the current entrenchment (DD).
Patience, focus and self-control to win the game with diligence.
Vn
vinabao
Jul 30 2014 at 16:37
104 โพสต์
Can you explain to me about the
Gain:+413.4%
Abs. Gain:+99.68%

Those number is different means :
1- you withdraw fund from account .
2- you keep deposit more fund every time has big DD to make DD lower .

I dont see the withdraw at all so that means you keep deposit more fund each time bid DD to make DD lower ?
if that case would be bad for followers because most of followers dont have extra fund to rescues the DD that can cause blowup accounts .
Please explain why you keep deposit fund over times and why the 2 number above so much different .
(normally the best account should have 2 number the same except withdraw the fund ).
Thanks for the reply .
Vn
vinabao
Jul 30 2014 at 16:43
104 โพสต์
Clopma posted:
It will be a disaster for those who do not have hedging privileges with their broker. That is the only way the account can safely be salvaged given the current entrenchment (DD).

Hedging is much smarter than close stop loss because it will slowly release the loss overtime .It will be much better for new followers and keep the record clean .
For example you have 10 positions open and you have to SL close all those positions stop loss 10% instead of doing that you just hedge 10 positions and slowly close -1% each time over may 1 month so every few days you lose about -1% .
That is perfect solution and at the end of the month you still have + . and good for new followers .
Smart traders do that all the times .
ArdiFX
forex_trader_[136673]
Jul 30 2014 at 16:44
852 โพสต์
@vinabao

There were new deposits on the account that is why absolute gain is lower.
Vn
vinabao
Jul 30 2014 at 16:50
104 โพสต์
ahuruglica posted:
@vinabao

There were new deposits on the account that is why absolute gain is lower.
NO signal provider should deposit more fund to account when you have big DD at all .
99% of followers dont have extra fund to deposit to rescues account .
If SP keep deposit more fund to make DD number small than it is big NO NO .
Hope he would never do that .
ArdiFX
forex_trader_[136673]
Jul 30 2014 at 16:59
852 โพสต์
I agree with you.

I've seen enough traders do that, almost most of them after a while run dry of new funds. With each deposit more funds are required to cover the DD.


It is up to investors to do a bit of research before trusting their money to someone else.
goode
Jul 30 2014 at 19:48
220 โพสต์
three account that i followed this signal. two account buy 1 lot and sell one 1 lot need $0,but the other need half of margin.i hope Gabriel Urse can do his best to close all order in profit or a small loss.

now there are too many orders and used too many margin.luckly,he will hedging.😄
โปรดเข้าสู่ระบบเพื่อแสดงความคิดเห็น