Edit Your Comment
Who is a better trader in this scenario?

forex_trader_535230
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jun 29, 2018
27 โพสต์
Jul 02, 2018 at 13:55
(แก้ไขแล้ว Jul 02, 2018 at 11:39)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jun 29, 2018
27 โพสต์
Of course ultimately, it is about preference and what you value, but just for discussion/fun's sake, let's do this.
Who is a better in this scenario, assuming they both have the same ROI, drawdown, win rate and whatever statistics (lot size) you deem to be important-Trader A: the trader that trades the same few pairs over and over or Trader B: the trader that is able to trade many different pairs?
Trader A is obviously skilled in the sense that he is able to capture the trend moves, counter-trend moves, all the small and big moves in that same few pairs. On the other hand, Trader B is able to understand and execute across different pairs.
Who, in your opinion, is the better trader, assuming you got to pick one.
Who is a better in this scenario, assuming they both have the same ROI, drawdown, win rate and whatever statistics (lot size) you deem to be important-Trader A: the trader that trades the same few pairs over and over or Trader B: the trader that is able to trade many different pairs?
Trader A is obviously skilled in the sense that he is able to capture the trend moves, counter-trend moves, all the small and big moves in that same few pairs. On the other hand, Trader B is able to understand and execute across different pairs.
Who, in your opinion, is the better trader, assuming you got to pick one.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Apr 09, 2018
37 โพสต์
Jul 03, 2018 at 06:07
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Apr 09, 2018
37 โพสต์
In general I would say trader B. I say this because there are times when pairs will go dead; there will be very low volatility (or maybe the reverse - volatility is too high to trade). In that sense, trader A would be sitting on their hands while trader B would still be able to trade.
I would also say that if a trading strategy or system is truly robust then it will work across many assets and markets. So if trader A is successfully trading, say, the USD majors, they could likely apply that same strategy or system in other pairs.
I would also say that if a trading strategy or system is truly robust then it will work across many assets and markets. So if trader A is successfully trading, say, the USD majors, they could likely apply that same strategy or system in other pairs.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 03, 2018
1 โพสต์
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 05, 2016
1097 โพสต์
Jul 03, 2018 at 08:49
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 05, 2016
1097 โพสต์
Trader A is the better trader.
If it looks too good to be true, it's probably a scam! Let the buyer beware.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Nov 21, 2011
1601 โพสต์
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 27, 2017
875 โพสต์
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 22, 2011
4573 โพสต์
Sep 27, 2018 at 10:58
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 22, 2011
4573 โพสต์
If the nubers are the same
...
they both have the same ROI, drawdown, win rate and whatever statistics (lot size) you deem to be important
...
None of them is better as it is not important if they trade one or more pairs.
Howgh
...
they both have the same ROI, drawdown, win rate and whatever statistics (lot size) you deem to be important
...
None of them is better as it is not important if they trade one or more pairs.
Howgh
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 06, 2018
3 โพสต์
Sep 27, 2018 at 13:49
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 06, 2018
3 โพสต์
Trader A is obviously a specialist. Trader B diversifies. But what's to say trader A is simply just comfortable doing their thing and can't be bothered trading everything. That is the thing really. Neither is better, and as the saying goes, there is no room for ego's in trading. Once you become complacent and think your sooo good you can't go wrong, there's a big dick sneeking up on you from behind that is going to do you when you least expect it, if you know what i mean. I'd pick the trader that does their own thing and does not boast. Better long term. Style means nothing. There is no right or wrong way to trade. Period.
I'll take the money thanks, you can have the pips..
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 28, 2018
9 โพสต์
Sep 28, 2018 at 10:38
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 28, 2018
9 โพสต์
It is all down to personal preference. For some people if they are only looking at a few pairs, it is easy to over trade and see things that are not there. But likelwise if you trade too many pairs then you never get to understand any
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 27, 2017
875 โพสต์
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 12, 2018
23 โพสต์
Apr 01, 2019 at 10:31
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 12, 2018
23 โพสต์
Project73 posted:
Of course ultimately, it is about preference and what you value, but just for discussion/fun's sake, let's do this.
Who is a better in this scenario, assuming they both have the same ROI, drawdown, win rate and whatever statistics (lot size) you deem to be important-Trader A: the trader that trades the same few pairs over and over or Trader B: the trader that is able to trade many different pairs?
Trader A is obviously skilled in the sense that he is able to capture the trend moves, counter-trend moves, all the small and big moves in that same few pairs. On the other hand, Trader B is able to understand and execute across different pairs.
Who, in your opinion, is the better trader, assuming you got to pick one.
I don't think one really is better than the other. I think trader B can have just as much knowledge of trends as trader A does.
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 22, 2011
4573 โพสต์
Apr 02, 2019 at 06:17
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 22, 2011
4573 โพสต์
Project73 posted:
Of course ultimately, it is about preference and what you value, but just for discussion/fun's sake, let's do this.
Who is a better in this scenario, assuming they both have the same ROI, drawdown, win rate and whatever statistics (lot size) you deem to be important-Trader A: the trader that trades the same few pairs over and over or Trader B: the trader that is able to trade many different pairs?
Trader A is obviously skilled in the sense that he is able to capture the trend moves, counter-trend moves, all the small and big moves in that same few pairs. On the other hand, Trader B is able to understand and execute across different pairs.
Who, in your opinion, is the better trader, assuming you got to pick one.
For manual trading it is better to go with A as trader cannot focus on more pairs properly.
For EA multiple pairs - B, is the choice as EA can handle this properly and diversify the risk
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 11, 2019
6 โพสต์

forex_trader_275100
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 17, 2015
121 โพสต์
Apr 03, 2019 at 05:59
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 17, 2015
121 โพสต์
Project73 posted:
Of course ultimately, it is about preference and what you value, but just for discussion/fun's sake, let's do this.
Who is a better in this scenario, assuming they both have the same ROI, drawdown, win rate and whatever statistics (lot size) you deem to be important-Trader A: the trader that trades the same few pairs over and over or Trader B: the trader that is able to trade many different pairs?
Trader A is obviously skilled in the sense that he is able to capture the trend moves, counter-trend moves, all the small and big moves in that same few pairs. On the other hand, Trader B is able to understand and execute across different pairs.
Who, in your opinion, is the better trader, assuming you got to pick one.
if you cannot make profit at 1 pair - do not go at multipair trading, because it will make your problems x-times more you have added pairs in your system. Trader A better in this case. Trader B more like dont know ewhat to do but believe in something that he not understand

*การใช้งานเชิงพาณิชย์และสแปมจะไม่ได้รับการยอมรับ และอาจส่งผลให้บัญชีถูกยกเลิก
เคล็ดลับ: การโพสต์รูปภาพ/youtube url จะฝังลงในโพสต์ของคุณโดยอัตโนมัติ!
เคล็ดลับ: พิมพ์เครื่องหมาย @ เพื่อป้อนชื่อผู้ใช้ที่เข้าร่วมการสนทนานี้โดยอัตโนมัติ