Algotrader Expert Advisor Beta testing v.5.2 (โดย forex_trader_313537)
ผู้ใช้ได้ลบระบบนี้
Edit Your Comment
Algotrader Expert Advisor Beta testing v.5.2 การสนทนา
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 01, 2015
231 โพสต์
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 04, 2010
1447 โพสต์
Jul 21, 2016 at 14:10
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Dec 04, 2010
1447 โพสต์
ZKFXtrader posted:most likely I always say unless they are open honest and show a real live verified account stay away.
They are afraid to show the real account. They display it 'on and off' basis. I think, when the real account in in profit, they show it, and when it busts, they hide it.
Jul 22, 2016 at 08:15
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Oct 17, 2009
8 โพสต์
ahmedfouad posted:
Hi Vendor,
Instead of paying 2,000 USD full amount for EA and we don't know how it will do on real.
We are happy to try it.
BUT can you publish your product on MQL5 and open monthly rent option at 100 or 200 USD for example instead of paying the unguaranteed one time big payment...?
Like this we'll try with you and you will still get money with no commitment on real..!!!!
And you don't need to open history and justify this many times...!!!
How do you like ? Good deal...?! 😎😁
I agree! Great idea!
Protecting your capital is the first priority!
Jul 22, 2016 at 09:16
(แก้ไขแล้ว Jul 22, 2016 at 09:17)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Sep 29, 2012
416 โพสต์
No, this is a dumb idea. Why do you have to pay for his demo signals while there are many real signals at MQL5???? I have no idea why a bunch of you still hope that this EA works? Go learn a manual system rather than relying on a ghost . some newbies don't even spend time to read about all warnings in this thread.
There will always some good opportunities , just don't give up

forex_trader_271574
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 28, 2015
1 โพสต์
Jul 23, 2016 at 19:37
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Aug 28, 2015
1 โพสต์
OK, first comment ever for me but I'll give it a go.
I worked for many years inside MT forex Brokers and I think many people are lacking of the knowledge or experience to properly asses a product.
First of all, a fact:
Demo Servers run on average on a much higher latency than Real ones, ergo the execution should be far worst on a Demo if comparing it to a slippage free environment on A book or a properly run B book Dealing Desk with instant execution.
Saying that, if you know what I am talking about and selected the right trading environment results are usually better on a Live Account, more reliable; if you know how to select the right broker.
I have bought this EA, I am testing it now with 10K... why not?
I know if you have a good server, not the cheap ones for 20$; you are getting a decent environment to run 1 MT4... no more; considering you are running 20-24 pairs at the same time (under their guidance).
I know money managers that are making money using a local copier from a Demo signal, how about that?
You have to make sure your system is always functioning correctly, even twice a day but at the end of the day... Demo or Live results makes little different on my opinion.
Find the broker which offers the best and most reliable execution and that's it, anyway..
I hope I am not upsetting anyone with this comment.
Best,
Matt
I worked for many years inside MT forex Brokers and I think many people are lacking of the knowledge or experience to properly asses a product.
First of all, a fact:
Demo Servers run on average on a much higher latency than Real ones, ergo the execution should be far worst on a Demo if comparing it to a slippage free environment on A book or a properly run B book Dealing Desk with instant execution.
Saying that, if you know what I am talking about and selected the right trading environment results are usually better on a Live Account, more reliable; if you know how to select the right broker.
I have bought this EA, I am testing it now with 10K... why not?
I know if you have a good server, not the cheap ones for 20$; you are getting a decent environment to run 1 MT4... no more; considering you are running 20-24 pairs at the same time (under their guidance).
I know money managers that are making money using a local copier from a Demo signal, how about that?
You have to make sure your system is always functioning correctly, even twice a day but at the end of the day... Demo or Live results makes little different on my opinion.
Find the broker which offers the best and most reliable execution and that's it, anyway..
I hope I am not upsetting anyone with this comment.
Best,
Matt
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ May 15, 2013
4 โพสต์
Jul 26, 2016 at 11:36
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Oct 17, 2009
8 โพสต์
You either WANT buyers or you DON'T... If you are making so much money, why not taking $1000 and keep history open for buyers to study. The moment you hide a real account and open it for a few minutes and hide it again it makes buyers suspicious...
There is a whole list of Autotraders that we can choose from who publish their honest live accounts and history for far much less than you want... http://www.myfxbook.com/autotrade
Why will someone spend $1000 on something that he is not sure what he will get?
Don't play games we are not puppets!
There is a whole list of Autotraders that we can choose from who publish their honest live accounts and history for far much less than you want... http://www.myfxbook.com/autotrade
Why will someone spend $1000 on something that he is not sure what he will get?
Don't play games we are not puppets!
Protecting your capital is the first priority!
Jul 27, 2016 at 06:13
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Mar 09, 2013
7 โพสต์
Предположу, что это типичный арбитражник на демке, разумеется с идеальным исполнением. Либо бот-пробойник, который тоже на демке идеально может исполнять. Смотрим среднее время сделок:
https://gyazo.com/cfb35a502d1e48e674fffbbbcef1986d
99% это сделки до 1-й минуты. И только малая часть очень длительный (скорее всего хедж, чтобы по пунктам график не просадить). Отсюда среднее время жизни ордера 45 минут, что и вводит в заблуждение людей. В общем неплохо придумано, для людей плохо разбирающихся в статистике - всё очень красиво и реально. Однозначно - внимания не стоит эта "система". И не будет никакого реального мониторинга у нормального брокера.
https://gyazo.com/cfb35a502d1e48e674fffbbbcef1986d
99% это сделки до 1-й минуты. И только малая часть очень длительный (скорее всего хедж, чтобы по пунктам график не просадить). Отсюда среднее время жизни ордера 45 минут, что и вводит в заблуждение людей. В общем неплохо придумано, для людей плохо разбирающихся в статистике - всё очень красиво и реально. Однозначно - внимания не стоит эта "система". И не будет никакого реального мониторинга у нормального брокера.
stalker1980@
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jan 01, 2015
231 โพสต์

*การใช้งานเชิงพาณิชย์และสแปมจะไม่ได้รับการยอมรับ และอาจส่งผลให้บัญชีถูกยกเลิก
เคล็ดลับ: การโพสต์รูปภาพ/youtube url จะฝังลงในโพสต์ของคุณโดยอัตโนมัติ!
เคล็ดลับ: พิมพ์เครื่องหมาย @ เพื่อป้อนชื่อผู้ใช้ที่เข้าร่วมการสนทนานี้โดยอัตโนมัติ