Advertisement
FXCharger (โดย forexstore )
The user has made his system private.
FXCharger การสนทนา
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Nov 18, 2015
241 โพสต์
Nov 22, 2016 at 18:11
i wonder how this account survived this long despite the high risk, very high risk
Nov 23, 2016 at 07:21
successwill posted:
i wonder how this account survived this long despite the high risk, very high risk
-------------------
You can vary the risk to whatever you want
Just to add I have only been running this for a week on a demo account risking 35%
Nothing out of turn as yet seems to behaving itself
Running in partnership a Blessings set file
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Nov 18, 2015
241 โพสต์
Nov 23, 2016 at 15:51
userpro1 posted:successwill posted:
i wonder how this account survived this long despite the high risk, very high risk
-------------------
You can vary the risk to whatever you want
Just to add I have only been running this for a week on a demo account risking 35%
Nothing out of turn as yet seems to behaving itself
Running in partnership a Blessings set file
Are you not using the default settings?
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 22, 2011
4573 โพสต์
Nov 24, 2016 at 07:31
It is clear martingale.
All martingale ends up badly
You can never say when and that is the key.
It can end up badly very next week you use it on your account...
11.21.2016 14:15 11.23.2016 07:11 AUDUSD Buy 2.30 0.73746 0.74305 55.9 1289.88 1d 9.53%
11.22.2016 14:15 11.23.2016 07:11 AUDUSD Buy 3.45 0.74059 0.74305 24.6 851.84 16h 56m 5.75%
11.18.2016 14:15 11.23.2016 07:11 AUDUSD Buy 1.53 0.73913 0.74305 39.2 603.93 4d 4.67%
11.11.2016 14:15 11.23.2016 07:11 AUDUSD Buy 0.20 0.75868 0.74305 -156.3 -310.79 11d -2.09%
11.16.2016 14:15 11.23.2016 07:11 AUDUSD Buy 0.68 0.74769 0.74305 -46.4 -311.18 6d -2.29%
11.14.2016 14:15 11.23.2016 07:11 AUDUSD Buy 0.30 0.75505 0.74305 -120.0 -357.56 8d -2.46%
11.17.2016 14:15 11.23.2016 07:11 AUDUSD Buy 1.02 0.74660 0.74305 -35.5 -358.38 5d -2.70%
11.15.2016 14:15 11.23.2016 07:11 AUDUSD Buy 0.45 0.75615 0.74305 -131.0 -586.22 7d -4.13%
All martingale ends up badly
You can never say when and that is the key.
It can end up badly very next week you use it on your account...
11.21.2016 14:15 11.23.2016 07:11 AUDUSD Buy 2.30 0.73746 0.74305 55.9 1289.88 1d 9.53%
11.22.2016 14:15 11.23.2016 07:11 AUDUSD Buy 3.45 0.74059 0.74305 24.6 851.84 16h 56m 5.75%
11.18.2016 14:15 11.23.2016 07:11 AUDUSD Buy 1.53 0.73913 0.74305 39.2 603.93 4d 4.67%
11.11.2016 14:15 11.23.2016 07:11 AUDUSD Buy 0.20 0.75868 0.74305 -156.3 -310.79 11d -2.09%
11.16.2016 14:15 11.23.2016 07:11 AUDUSD Buy 0.68 0.74769 0.74305 -46.4 -311.18 6d -2.29%
11.14.2016 14:15 11.23.2016 07:11 AUDUSD Buy 0.30 0.75505 0.74305 -120.0 -357.56 8d -2.46%
11.17.2016 14:15 11.23.2016 07:11 AUDUSD Buy 1.02 0.74660 0.74305 -35.5 -358.38 5d -2.70%
11.15.2016 14:15 11.23.2016 07:11 AUDUSD Buy 0.45 0.75615 0.74305 -131.0 -586.22 7d -4.13%
Nov 24, 2016 at 07:38
successwill posted:userpro1 posted:successwill posted:
i wonder how this account survived this long despite the high risk, very high risk
-------------------
You can vary the risk to whatever you want
Just to add I have only been running this for a week on a demo account risking 35%
Nothing out of turn as yet seems to behaving itself
Running in partnership a Blessings set file
Are you not using the default settings?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I did only changed the lot size....still backtesting
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 26, 2010
80 โพสต์
Jan 03, 2017 at 15:04
How u know the last trade is closed manually?
yes
forex_trader_305974
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Feb 16, 2016
71 โพสต์
Jan 14, 2017 at 16:54
Hi everyone and we are hope you had good holidays! Yes, last trades at 2016 year was closed manually and EA was stopped because of holidays period. Previously was made an announcement on the website about that.
Jan 23, 2017 at 13:44
There is one thing, which is irritating:
In your backtests you use a fixed time for opening the first orders based on GMT settings. But a 5 year backtest can not consider the yearly switch between summer- and winter time. So is the backtest based on pure luck, as it uses different entry points during summer and winter time?
In your backtests you use a fixed time for opening the first orders based on GMT settings. But a 5 year backtest can not consider the yearly switch between summer- and winter time. So is the backtest based on pure luck, as it uses different entry points during summer and winter time?
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 26, 2010
80 โพสต์
Jan 29, 2017 at 10:26
Hi,
I bought this ea and unfortunately I am deceived because the ea is marginal and work if the market is in range so this ea is very risky.
Farid
I bought this ea and unfortunately I am deceived because the ea is marginal and work if the market is in range so this ea is very risky.
Farid
yes
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ May 04, 2012
1534 โพสต์
Jan 29, 2017 at 15:48
Many seniors members have warned readers that it was a MARTINGALE!
I am just curious: Why have you bought it then...? 🙄
I am just curious: Why have you bought it then...? 🙄
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ Jul 26, 2010
80 โพสต์
Jan 29, 2017 at 15:54
Hi
Show me what you tell
Show me what you tell
yes
เป็นสมาชิกตั้งแต่ May 04, 2012
1534 โพสต์
Jan 30, 2017 at 07:53
fmlbfx2010 posted:
Hi
Show me what you tell
Please read ALL the posts from Page #1.
Just for example Post #3 on page #1 from @upandgo who wrote:
""Extremely dangerous Martingale !
Opens 9.6 lots to recover initial 0.15 lot..
Just a matter of time to crash.""
Or you can read the post of @togr on Page #3 who wrote:
""It is clear martingale.
All martingale ends up badly
You can never say when and that is the key.
It can end up badly very next week you use it on your account...""
And it goes on and on and on... In other words: Many people have pointed out how dangerous this EA was before you purchased it.
I got my 31 Vouches on MyFxBook for pointing out dangerous and outright scam strategies over the years and there are many other members who have been doing just the same, but apparently we cannot save everybody from spending money on useless and doomed EAs...
Please click "Vouch" if you liked my post. If not, just put me on your Blocked list. :o)
Mar 03, 2017 at 07:50
userpro1 posted:
Its true i bought it and wish i had not- manage your own money or copy traders EAs do not work its a myth
Thanks for the heads up from your feedback seems like the same forex-incontrol developers which now has vanished from myfxbook
Time is Money
Mar 07, 2017 at 07:27
fxcharger posted:RedRhinoFX posted:fxcharger posted:upandgo posted:
Extremely dangerous Martingale !
Opens 9.6 lots to recover initial 0.15 lot..
Just a matter of time to crash
That is why FXCharger come with risk controlling. The StopLoss is calculated accordingly to the risks that you specified in settings. For example if you specify 20% risk, EA will calculate initial lotsize and put the StopLoss on the price, which will not allow you to lose more than you set in EA.
What risk setting do you use? Is this MAX? Is this trend follow or means reversion?
On this account we use max risk to show the potential of the system. First trade looking for trend, all other wait for reversion. All trades have smart TakeProfit and StopLoss, to have possibility
You determine the size of the risk can be set
to close trades in profit and good period of time
